Not Bob |
10-06-2004 04:02 PM |
There was a debate????
Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Kate O'Beirne said it best, in that Edwards is so fucking irrelevant that Cheney probably didn't even know or care who he was the - what, three - times they were at a prayer breakfast or getting yelled at by Matthews.
That being said, they should have anticpated being spun immediately thereafter with the CSPAN photo capture.
|
The problem isn't that Cheney thinks that Edwards is an empty suit. Heck, I'm sure that Lloyd Bentsen felt the same way about Dan Quayle. But Ms. O'Beirne is selling nothing but spin by calling Edwards irrelevant -- the Bush-Cheney '04 people have known all about Mister Trial Lawyer for a loooooong time. They started putting out the "Breck Girl" comments about him over a year ago, if memory serves. He may be a Bob Forehead in their minds, but he's been on their minds. That ain't gonna cut it.
Simply put, Cheney fucked up. He relied upon his apparently faulty memory to try to slam Edwards by demonstrating how cavalierly he took his Senate duties. Or, his staff fucked up by relying upon his apparently faulty memory. You had to think that that was a planned line. Why didn't Scooter or Matalin do some legwork to make sure that the boss had never met the Breck boy before they allowed the boss to say it on the air like that?
It may undercut Cheney by allowing Edwards to show that the facts don't matter to Cheney -- you can hear Edwards saying "he misled the American people about 9/11, about WMD, even about whether he met me." And it backfires becuase now instead of talking about Edwards' lack of attendance, we're talking about Dick's gaffe.
That being said, why did Posada try to score on Hunter? Why, bilmore, why?
|