![]() |
Quote:
(I think that it would be morally acceptable at this point to invade Zimbabwe. If practical reasons suggested such a move, morality would be consistent with it. Absent those practical reasons, we may not be moved to invade, simply because we can't do everything, but not being able to do everything should not mean that we can do nothing.) |
Anyone got a spare prayer mat?
A guy at work tells me about this site that asks for your actual beliefs in order to ascertain your compatibility with various religions. He thought it was interesting because he was raised Catholic and it says he'd be a good Orthodox Jew. I was raised Catholic and it says I'm pretty much 100% Regular Jew. The Jewish guy down the hall comes back as a conservative Quaker.
http://www.beliefnet.com/story/76/story_7665_1.html 20 questions, though I guess the trick is to focus on what you actually believe, not what you've been taught to believe. Hello Oh yeah, and I was shocked, shocked I say, to find that my 4th most compatible religion is, uhm, Islam. Please don't tell Ashcroft. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
SuperGrover Runs Afoul of Godwin's Law
Quote:
So I don't think it is correct to say that people who are aware of those findings and believe, overall, that they mean that WMD have in fact been discovered, necessarily have a "misperception." (In fact, I would wager that people who have been following the news enough to be aware of those discoveries and their current "left by the wayside but not retracted or disproved" status at all are probably significantly better informed that the usual news consumer.) If the question were phrased more like: "the US has conclusively demonstrated that Iraq had WMD," I would think the misperception lable was entirely appropriate. The use of the words "clear evidence" in the al Qaida question seems key to me. But I have a larger beef with the poll: where is the option to get most of your news from the internet? Frankly, that's what I've been doing, and by comparison to the news services available online, ALL U.S. coverage just seems to me to be SHOCKINGLY bad by comparison. (Though, in fairness, I currently consider the economist to be an "online" news source, not print.) |
Anyone got a spare prayer mat?
Quote:
|
Anyone got a spare prayer mat?
Quote:
I am apparently least compatible with being a Catholic, which is what I am. Apparently I ought to become a Quaker instead. |
Quote:
|
Anyone got a spare prayer mat?
Quote:
Followed by Scientology. Now I'm worried. BR(edited to add: least compatible: Jehovas' Witnesses (9%), 7th Day Adventists (18%), RC (20%), Eastern Orthodox (20%), Mormon (29%), mainline conservative proddy (29%))C |
Anyone got a spare prayer mat?
Quote:
1. Reform Judaism (100%) 2. Sikhism (93%) 3. Liberal Quakers (92%) 4. Bahá'í Faith (89%) 5. Orthodox Judaism (84%) 6. Islam (82%) The religion of my birth and upbringing was ranked 25. The religion I actually practice today was ranked 7. I think it would have ranked higher, but I have this recurring problem wherein I call "bullshit" on the Incarnation. I can't help myself. |
Anyone got a spare prayer mat?
Quote:
|
ISLAM is a religion of PEACE, but keep quiet while We're TRYIng to THINK!
Moroccan teacher throw talkitive students out window
http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/africa...eut/index.html |
ISLAM is a religion of PEACE, but keep quiet while We're TRYIng to THINK!
Quote:
|
ISLAM is a religion of PEACE, but keep quiet while We're TRYIng to THINK!
Quote:
|
Anyone got a spare prayer mat?
Quote:
1. Liberal Quakers (100%) 2. Unitarian Universalism (98%) 3. Mainline to Liberal Christian Protestants (97%) 4. Secular Humanism (84%) 5. Bahá'í Faith (82%) 6. Neo-Pagan (77%) 7. Reform Judaism (75%) 8. New Age (71%) 9. Theravada Buddhism (67%) 10. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons) (65%) |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:37 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com