Top 20
 

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4014

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4015

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4016

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4017

TM

Top 20
 

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4018

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4019

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4020

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4021

TM

Top 20
 

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4022

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4023

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4024

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4025

TM

Top 20
 

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4026

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4027

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4028

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4029

TM

Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
 

They seem to be getting very big, very fast, and they're moving around more. Every time I check in on them, I worry that they're going to fall out of the nest. Mom and dad need to build it up.

Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
 

I only look at this one but apparently there are several. The wife is looking at one in Iowa that is downright slovenly. Old carcasses, sticks litter the nest; lazy mom/dad. Do not question the parenting of the President and First Lady.

RT holding me back!
 

I know it isn't technically a violation of free speech, but it sure would be nice if this sidd@60 sock could go active.........

Re: RT holding me back!
 

Whoops, sorrry. Should be up now.

Top 20
 

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4030

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4031

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4032

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4033

TM

Re: RT holding me back!
 

You and your nostalgia socks.

Top 20
 

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4034

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4035

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4036

http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...postcount=4037

TM

Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
 

Holy shit is Prince dead now? 2016 sucks.

Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
 

I can kind of wrap my head around some rock stars exiting. Bowie hadn't been healthy for years, and it defied medicine that Lemmy and Motorhead were still putting out records in 2015. Paul Kantner looked like death for years, and who'd cared about the Jefferson Airplane in the last 20 years anyway. But Prince? Neil Young, Ringo, [insert Stone here]... they're next. Not Prince. Not the guy from Chappelle's basketball-and-pancakes sketch!

Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
 

It is all Prince on the local alt-rock station:

http://www.thecurrent.org/listen

And Minnesota Public Radio is devoting all its programming right now to Prince. It would truly be hard to overestimate the influence he had over this community and the love this community has for him.

Re: No Faith in the Moral Standards of the Players as a Group
 

It's hard to overestimate the influence he had on music generally. Beatles comparisons are a sort of Godwin's Law when talking about this stuff. But they fit here in the regard that no sane person can say he doesn't really love at least three or four Beatles tunes. The same goes for Prince. (It also fits for Bowie, but I'm a bit burned out talking about Bowie right now, given that period of mourning has just ended.)

And if Purple Rain isn't a pop culture touchstone immediately rewinding you to your early teens, you weren't clinically alive during that decade.