LawTalkers
Page 111 of 126 « First 1161101109110 111 112113121 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Fashion Board--Penske . . . forever! (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=742)

Diane_Keaton 08-29-2006 01:15 PM
Scissoring
 
Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Waitttaminute - did Diane just come out of the "bi" closet after all these years?
Scissoring doesn't count since you can't really see the other person anyway (at least I don't think you can - hence the question). You guys have your own little exemptions too you know.

patentparanyc 08-29-2006 01:16 PM
Hot or Not, Minnesota Style
 
Quote:
Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
Riiiight. "Lashed out" and exposed yourself for the racist, sexist, pathetic little worm that you are. I'd much rather just be a mean bitch.

Anyway, enough of this. Because I like not Bob, I am officially ignoring you forever now.
You are the one who thinks being white is so great. oh and "wealthy"

robustpuppy 08-29-2006 01:18 PM
Hot or Not, Minnesota Style
 
Quote:
Originally posted by patentparanyc
You are the one who thinks being white is so great. oh and "wealthy"
If this were a bar, NotBob would be running you to the door and shielding your body with his.

Shape Shifter 08-29-2006 01:20 PM
Hot or Not, Minnesota Style
 
Quote:
Originally posted by patentparanyc
You are the one who thinks being white is so great. oh and "wealthy"
You are whiffing.

patentparanyc 08-29-2006 01:20 PM
Hot or Not, Minnesota Style
 
Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
If this were a bar, NotBob would be running you to the door and shielding your body with his.
No worries, NotAllThat, she has me on "ignore."

str8outavannuys 08-29-2006 01:24 PM
Hot or Not, Minnesota Style
 
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
did you get some lambchops afterwards?

I went to the arkansas state fair. I don't recall any animals.
I've had mini donuts in the food building at the Canadian National Exposition. I'm guessing I'm not the only one here who can say so.

Hank Chinaski 08-29-2006 01:24 PM
Hot or Not, Minnesota Style
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Not Bob
I am her friend. And I am not getting any kicks out of this at all.

As was pointed out to me the last time this came up, it really isn't my place to act as the hall monitor here. (Despite the fact that I would be a really good one.) Nonetheless, I am compelled one more time to say that this whole thing is just a bunch of bullshit.

I don't think that the public board is the place for this discussion, but since everyone involved seems to think that it is, it is clear that a bunch of people have been dicks to ppnyc ever since her return. They should stop. And she should stop responding to them. And to others who have already stopped. And from doing so using Not Public information.

If you don't like someone, put them on ignore.
Because of you I stopped saying nononono is a guy, even though he clearly is.

Shape Shifter 08-29-2006 01:29 PM
Scissoring
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
Scissoring doesn't count since you can't really see the other person anyway (at least I don't think you can - hence the question). You guys have your own little exemptions too you know.
I shouldn't touch this with a 10-foot prole, but what exemptions?

Replaced_Texan 08-29-2006 01:31 PM
Hot or Not, Minnesota Style
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Not Bob
I am her friend. And I am not getting any kicks out of this at all.

As was pointed out to me the last time this came up, it really isn't my place to act as the hall monitor here. (Despite the fact that I would be a really good one.) Nonetheless, I am compelled one more time to say that this whole thing is just a bunch of bullshit.

I don't think that the public board is the place for this discussion, but since everyone involved seems to think that it is, it is clear that a bunch of people have been dicks to ppnyc ever since her return. They should stop. And she should stop responding to them. And to others who have already stopped. And from doing so using Not Public information.

If you don't like someone, put them on ignore.
I have some very small sympathy for ppnyc in that it is very difficult for anyone to sustain a dignified defense with 40 lawyers simultaneously gunning for you.* It may even feel a coordinated attack, even though it is not.

But I do not think that she should be treated like an eggshell poster because she's unable to take the fallout from what anyone who has read (and comprehended) a day of this board could see was going to be an unmitigated disaster on all fronts. I take shit on a regular basis about my driving. The Wonk fat jokes prevail even though they're now inapplicable. NFH still takes crap on a regular basis about her objecting to an image involving her grandparents. Hank's drinking problem is always thrown in his face. Ty's mad editing skilzz on the PB will always be brought up again and again and again. Did you know that str8 went to Yale? History has shown that objecting to ribbing and making fun of something will only exacerbate the jokes.

No one** gives a shit that ppnyc is "only a paralegal." In exchange, she shouldn't expect special treatment because she's not a lawyer. And if she says something objectionable--for example, that being a divorced woman is some sort of stigma--gwinky shouldn't be prohibited*** from responding just because she doesn't like ppnyc.

*Though I will say that as much as I hated, despised, and abhored Not Me, she could take it. The difference, though, was that Not Me wanted to be hated. That doesn't seem to be the case with ppnyc, though with some of the stuff that she says, maybe I've misjudged her.

**Except ppnyc.

***By prohibited, I mean urged not to respond, not actually censored, which isn't going to happen here.

str8outavannuys 08-29-2006 01:33 PM
Hot or Not, Minnesota Style
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Or "First Nations"? Or is that pretentious?
Nunavit forever!!

str8outavannuys 08-29-2006 01:35 PM
Hot or Not, Minnesota Style
 
Quote:
Originally posted by barely_legal
I'm not defending her. She can take care of herself. I'm talking about YOU. You are just a nasty piece of work. Nasty and stupid is a sad combination. Oh, and fat.
Now you're living up to your avatar!!! Go Janie!!!

patentparanyc 08-29-2006 01:36 PM
Hot or Not, Minnesota Style
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I have some very small sympathy for ppnyc in that it is very difficult for anyone to sustain a dignified defense with 40 lawyers simultaneously gunning for you.* It may even feel a coordinated attack, even though it is not.

But I do not think that she should be treated like an eggshell poster because she's unable to take the fallout from what anyone who has read (and comprehended) a day of this board could see was going to be an unmitigated disaster on all fronts. I take shit on a regular basis about my driving. The Wonk fat jokes prevail even though they're now inapplicable. NFH still takes crap on a regular basis about her objecting to an image involving her grandparents. Hank's drinking problem is always thrown in his face. Ty's mad editing skilzz on the PB will always be brought up again and again and again. Did you know that str8 went to Yale? History has shown that objecting to ribbing and making fun of something will only exacerbate the jokes.

No one** gives a shit that ppnyc is "only a paralegal." In exchange, she shouldn't expect special treatment because she's not a lawyer. And if she says something objectionable--for example, that being a divorced woman is some sort of stigma--gwinky shouldn't be prohibited*** from responding just because she doesn't like ppnyc.

*Though I will say that as much as I hated, despised, and abhored Not Me, she could take it. The difference, though, was that Not Me wanted sought out to be hated. That doesn't seem to be the case with ppnyc, though with some of the stuff that she says, maybe I've misjudged her.

**Except ppnyc.

***By prohibited, I mean urged not to respond, not actually censored, which isn't going to happen here.
while I appreciate the thoughtful nature of in which this was composed, RT, I don't expect special treatment since I am a non-JD. I just really really think that the merciless constant teasing was a bit much. And very mean-spirited. I took the dressing down from TM in the shorts and objected but went about my business in the normal fashion. The continued ribbing was incessant. I don't expect "special" treatment as a paralegal but as a dignified human. No one wants to be called fat and ugly constantly when that was his subjective asessment.

ltl/fb 08-29-2006 01:37 PM
Scissoring
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Shape Shifter
I shouldn't touch this with a 10-foot prole, but what exemptions?
Um, like fucking a chick who is blowing another guy, as long as the other guy is kind of obscured or it is dark or something.

nononono 08-29-2006 01:38 PM
Scissoring
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
Scissoring doesn't count since you can't really see the other person anyway (at least I don't think you can - hence the question). You guys have your own little exemptions too you know.
Sort of like how the reverse cowgirl isn't really sex, either, since you can't really see the person? :-)

ltl/fb 08-29-2006 01:38 PM
Scissoring
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Shape Shifter
You need a few more "t"s. Then it will be accurate.
Also, some of the "T"s should be capitalized.

Shape Shifter 08-29-2006 01:38 PM
Scissoring
 
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
Um, like fucking a chick who is blowing another guy, as long as the other guy is kind of obscured or it is dark or something.

That's so gay.*




nttawwt.

NotFromHere 08-29-2006 01:39 PM
Scissoring
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
Actually, that sounds really juicy and fun. I would definitely try that. But only just "try" it (like for just a few hours).

I don't get, though, where your head and arms would be. Would one gal be on one side of the bed and I'd be on the other? Kind of like doing "leg wrestling"?
Is it possible that you have never never ever seen any Skinemax? It's on every night. Every freaking night if you choose to watch it. Kind of like leg wrestling without so much of the wrestling.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-29-2006 01:40 PM
Hot or Not, Minnesota Style
 
Quote:
Originally posted by patentparanyc
while I appreciate the thoughtful nature of in which this was composed, RT, I don't expect special treatment since I am a non-JD. I just really really think that the merciless constant teasing was a bit much. And very mean-spirited. I took the dressing down from TM in the shorts and objected but went about my business in the normal fashion. The continued ribbing was incessant. I don't expect "special" treatment as a paralegal but as a dignified human. No one wants to be called fat and ugly constantly when that was his subjective asessment.
This board was full of merciless, mean-spirited, constant teasing from its inception, if not before that. No one here is treated like a dignified human, except maybe Not Bob.

str8outavannuys 08-29-2006 01:40 PM
Hot or Not, Minnesota Style
 
Quote:
Originally posted by patentparanyc
Yeah what do you expect after being denigrated mercilessly for days on end? sweet and lightness and the unbearable lightness of being?
How about finding another wall against which to beat your head?

You remind me of that guy in Vegas who's gone through all his ATM cards, and is now moving to the credit card cash advance. The trainwreck effect is what keeps you from the iggy list, for now.

nononono 08-29-2006 01:41 PM
Scissoring
 
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
Um, like fucking a chick who is blowing another guy, as long as the other guy is kind of obscured or it is dark or something.
I don't think that's an exemption. An exemption would be more like a guy blowing another guy because the chick he is fucking thinks it is hot. So, technically gay, but an exemption because it is for hetero reasons. Debatable, of course.

Shape Shifter 08-29-2006 01:41 PM
Hot or Not, Minnesota Style
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
This board was full of merciless, mean-spirited, constant teasing from its inception, if not before that. No one here is treated like a dignified human, except maybe Not Bob.
Fag.

Replaced_Texan 08-29-2006 01:41 PM
Hot or Not, Minnesota Style
 
Quote:
Originally posted by patentparanyc
while I appreciate the thoughtful nature of in which this was composed, RT, I don't expect special treatment since I am a non-JD. I just really really think that the merciless constant teasing was a bit much. And very mean-spirited. I took the dressing down from TM in the shorts and objected but went about my business in the normal fashion. The continued ribbing was incessant. I don't expect "special" treatment as a paralegal but as a dignified human. No one wants to be called fat and ugly constantly when that was his subjective asessment.
You responded to every.single.post. that could have possibly be construed to be negative about you and to a lot of posts that had absolutely nothing to do with you. For better or worse, that experience has been absorbed into the lexicon of this board. You're going to have to get used to it because there is no defense to it.

NotFromHere 08-29-2006 01:43 PM
Hot or Not, Minnesota Style
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Not Bob
I am her friend. And I am not getting any kicks out of this at all.

As was pointed out to me the last time this came up, it really isn't my place to act as the hall monitor here. (Despite the fact that I would be a really good one.) Nonetheless, I am compelled one more time to say that this whole thing is just a bunch of bullshit.

I don't think that the public board is the place for this discussion, but since everyone involved seems to think that it is, it is clear that a bunch of people have been dicks to ppnyc ever since her return. They should stop. And she should stop responding to them. And to others who have already stopped. And from doing so using Not Public information.

If you don't like someone, put them on ignore.
Dear NotBob, because I like you, I'd like to inform you that you are wrong, in part. Plus, I tried to be hall monitor yesterday and it worked for awhile, but *some* ppeople are just persistent.

People have not been dicks from the beginning. It actually started as hepful advice. Which fell on deaf ears. Then the bitchiness started. And escalated. And you have what you have now. Just fyi.

ltl/fb 08-29-2006 01:43 PM
Scissoring
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Shape Shifter
That's so gay.*




nttawwt.
What does the fucking asterisk reference???? Christ.

I didn't get anything about special treatment for ppnyc having to do with her being a paralegal -- I think it had to do with her being a whiny vindictive brat. I think the only reason RT brought up that it was a bunch of lawyers going at her is that lawyers are usually better than the average person at being creatively very insulting in writing.

People call me fat and vapid, and I believe there was a sock created at one point whose aim in life was to get me to leave the board by purporting to represent a majority of posters -- back when there were a lot more posters. Wah wah wah. You want nice, go participate on a board sponsored by BB or whatever it was that kicked us off because we used too much bad language.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-29-2006 01:43 PM
Hot or Not, Minnesota Style
 
Quote:
Originally posted by str8outavannuys
How about finding another wall against which to beat your head?

You remind me of that guy in Vegas who's gone through all his ATM cards, and is now moving to the credit card cash advance. The trainwreck effect is what keeps you from the iggy list, for now.
And you have reminded me of this:
  • In Jerusalem, a female CNN journalist heard about a very old Jewish man who had been going to the Wailing Wall to pray, twice a day, everyday, for a long, long time.

    So she went to check it out.

    She went to the Wailing Wall and there he was!

    She watched him pray and after about 45 minutes, when he turned to leave, she approached him for an interview.

    "I'm Rebecca Smith from CNN. Sir, how long have you been coming to the Wall and praying?"

    "For about 60 years."

    "60 years! That's amazing! What do you pray for?"

    "I pray for peace between the Christians, Jews and the Muslims. I pray for all the hatred to stop and I pray for all our children to grow up in safety and friendship."

    "How do you feel after doing this for 60 years?"

    "Like I'm talking to a fuckin' wall."

patentparanyc 08-29-2006 01:44 PM
Hot or Not, Minnesota Style
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
You responded to every.single.post. that could have possibly be construed to be negative about you and to a lot of posts that had absolutely nothing to do with you. For better or worse, that experience has been absorbed into the lexicon of this board. You're going to have to get used to it because there is no defense to it.
you're right, I contributed a bit. And I think I took most of it in good humor. The straw bit. The floppy tits bit.

Looks based shit humor is particularly humiliating but I digress.

J. Fred Muggs 08-29-2006 01:45 PM
Scissoring
 
Quote:
Originally posted by nononono
I don't think that's an exemption. An exemption would be more like a guy blowing another guy because the chick he is fucking thinks it is hot. So, technically gay, but an exemption because it is for hetero reasons. Debatable, of course.
This is proof that nononono is a chick. If there is a guy here that thinks that is debatably "not gay" (or gets an exemption) please step up.

ltl/fb 08-29-2006 01:45 PM
Scissoring
 
Quote:
Originally posted by nononono
I don't think that's an exemption. An exemption would be more like a guy blowing another guy because the chick he is fucking thinks it is hot. So, technically gay, but an exemption because it is for hetero reasons. Debatable, of course.
I can get behind that scenario.

When was nfh trying to be hall monitor? I missed it.

futbol fan 08-29-2006 01:45 PM
PPNYC's Cousin Throws Party In London
 
From another website:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have friend in the City you will have already seen this, apparently it has also made a few papers.

> -----Original Message-----
>From: Gao, Lucy [CIR]
>Sent: 16 August 2006 12:53
>To: [everyone at Citigroup London, apparently]

>Subject: Details and instructions for Lucy's Ritz Party

>Dear Friends,
>
>Thank you for all your replies and I am glad all of you can come this Friday to celebrate my 21st with me. Please read ALL the following to ensure your entry into the Ritz.

>Lucy's 21st Birthday Party at The Ritz Hotel London
>Friday, 18th of August
>9pm Champagne Reception
>10pm Photo Shoots
>10:30pm Blowing Candles
>Mid-night Pangaea, Mayfair
>
>I have arranged the Ritz to host a Champagne Reception with a selection of Ritz Champagne for all my guests, this will be on me so please come and indulge.
>
>A specially made birthday cake has also been ordered and the Ritz waiters will kindly serve you each a generous slice with Ritz
>cutleries, etc...also on me.
>
>INSTRUCTIONS FOR ENTRY:
>* When you arrive, take the Hotel entry on the opposite side
>of the Green Park tube station [Please refer to your arrival time at the end of this email]
>* When asked "how can I help you Sir/Madame?", you reply "I
>am here for Lucy's Birthday Party at the Rivoli Bar"
>* You will be escorted to the lounge area next to the Rivoli
>bar, where you will hopefully see a gorgeous group of ladies.
>
>If you experience any issues getting in or getting to the Ritz, please call my mobile on 07782 *** 450 and my PA Ms Gill will kindly deal with your queries between 8:30pm to 10pm.
>
>STRICT DRESS CODE:
>Gentlemen: Jacket, shirt, and please also bring a tie (no jeans,
>trainers, flip-flops, polo-shirts)
>Ladies: skirt/top, cocktail dress (no denim, min-skirts, flip-flips,
>bad tastes)
>Advice 1: It goes without saying that the more upper-class you dress, the less likely you shall be denied entry.
Advice 2: Photos will be taken between 10pm to 10:30pm, and these will be distributed once processed, therefore you may want to be well-groomed!
>
>Finally... I will be accepting cards and small gifts between 9pm to 11pm...<wink wink> hehehe
>
>I very much look forward to seeing you all at the Ritz this Friday.
>
>Lucy
>
>ARRIVAL TIMES: [Please stick to these as best as you can, thank you]
>9:00pm: Lucy, Sophie Sandner, Kajai, Mandeep, Preet, Sanami, Su, Lisa, Kate.
>9:15pm: Phoebe, Sophie Seugnet, Theo, Dmitry, Ed, Nikolay, Paul, Nick Harry.
>9:30pm: Marco, Andrea, Jess, Ovi, Yuki, Olga, Kim, Marcelo, Ulyana, Krystal, Dan.
>9:45pm: Sunita, Alan, JingJing, Emma.
>10:00pm: Anthony, Rachel, Roger, Uli, Yogi, Gharzi
>
>Lucy Gao
>
Citigroup | Real Estate Equity Research 4th Floor, Citigroup Centre
>(CGC1)
>25 Canada Square, London E14 5LB
>Direct Line: +44 207 986 ****
>Fax: +44 207 986 ****
>Mobile: +44 778 220 ****
>Email: lucy.gao@citigroup.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Oh my god! Read from the bottom! Its gone not only to EVERYONE in citi but i've just been told by my boss its gone all over the banks and they're all laughing about it.
>
______________________________________________

>
>You have to read this.....from the intern working on the property team - I can hardly contain myself!
>_____________________________________________

>... I don't like to spread things... I feel quite bad really - but you
>just HAVE to read this....
>______________________________________________

And then the bosses reply

>From: David
>Sent: 24 August 2006 14:05
>To: lucy.gao@citigroup.com
>Subject: Your Party: Fri 18th August
>
>Dear Lucy,
>
>Apologies for emailing on a private email address but I am currently on holiday in Barbados and refusing to access my Citigroup emails. However, I have had your email forwarded to me by one of my senior colleagues about your party this Friday. Unfortunately I will not be able to make it as:
>
>1. I always wear jeans and a t-shirt on the weekend (no exceptions) 2. The ritz is SO last season. 3. I would rather not have to waste time buying you a card and present, which you probably wouldn't need anyway 4. Your PA has advised me that most people won't be turning up so I won't miss much 5. Like most people, I'm not very good at sticking to arrival times and would probably miss my slot.
>
On a serious note, based on your email, I am quite dumbfounded with how you managed to get a job here with us this summer and i will be having some SERIOUS words with the person who interviewed you. The fact that you have obviously spent a lot of our 'Work Time', planning your birthday party and not doing the work we have given you is a clear indication that you are not taking this internship seriously and are not dedicated to the firm. I do not think we will be in a position to offer you a full time graduate placement following the internship.
>
>Kind regards,
>
>
>Executive Director,
>Global FI Trading Floor

ltl/fb 08-29-2006 01:45 PM
Scissoring
 
Quote:
Originally posted by J. Fred Muggs
This is proof that nononono is a chick. If there is a guy here that thinks that is debatably "not gay" please step up.
Is it gay when two women do the same thing because a guy thinks it's hot?

Did you just call me Coltrane? 08-29-2006 01:46 PM
Two things
 
Quote:
Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
We are. It never hurts to find out about cock activities though.
The air pressure on airplanes gives me No Reason Boners. I think.

Hank Chinaski 08-29-2006 01:46 PM
Hot or Not, Minnesota Style
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I have some very small sympathy for ppnyc in that it is very difficult for anyone to sustain a dignified defense with 40 lawyers simultaneously gunning for you.* It may even feel a coordinated attack, even though it is not.

But I do not think that she should be treated like an eggshell poster because she's unable to take the fallout from what anyone who has read (and comprehended) a day of this board could see was going to be an unmitigated disaster on all fronts. I take shit on a regular basis about my driving. The Wonk fat jokes prevail even though they're now inapplicable. NFH still takes crap on a regular basis about her objecting to an image involving her grandparents. Hank's drinking problem is always thrown in his face. Ty's mad editing skilzz on the PB will always be brought up again and again and again. Did you know that str8 went to Yale? History has shown that objecting to ribbing and making fun of something will only exacerbate the jokes.

No one** gives a shit that ppnyc is "only a paralegal." In exchange, she shouldn't expect special treatment because she's not a lawyer. And if she says something objectionable--for example, that being a divorced woman is some sort of stigma--gwinky shouldn't be prohibited*** from responding just because she doesn't like ppnyc.

*Though I will say that as much as I hated, despised, and abhored Not Me, she could take it. The difference, though, was that Not Me wanted to be hated. That doesn't seem to be the case with ppnyc, though with some of the stuff that she says, maybe I've misjudged her.

**Except ppnyc.

***By prohibited, I mean urged not to respond, not actually censored, which isn't going to happen here.
That was a very prudent post. Leaving out "SS is dumb" because it's true and thus more hurtful- maybe even outable.

ltl/fb 08-29-2006 01:48 PM
Two things
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
The air pressure on airplanes gives me No Reason Boners. I think.
Please explain your confusion.

robustpuppy 08-29-2006 01:48 PM
Nevermind.

nononono 08-29-2006 01:49 PM
Scissoring
 
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
I can get behind that scenario.

When was nfh trying to be hall monitor? I missed it.

No idea. I did, too.

Hank Chinaski 08-29-2006 01:51 PM
Scissoring
 
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
What does the fucking asterisk reference???? Christ.

I didn't get anything about special treatment for ppnyc having to do with her being a paralegal -- I think it had to do with her being a whiny vindictive brat. I think the only reason RT brought up that it was a bunch of lawyers going at her is that lawyers are usually better than the average person at being creatively very insulting in writing.

People call me fat and vapid, and I believe there was a sock created at one point whose aim in life was to get me to leave the board by purporting to represent a majority of posters -- back when there were a lot more posters. Wah wah wah. You want nice, go participate on a board sponsored by BB or whatever it was that kicked us off because we used too much bad language.
I'm sorry for the dead cat posts.

J. Fred Muggs 08-29-2006 01:51 PM
Scissoring
 
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
Is it gay when two women do the same thing because a guy thinks it's hot?
No, it's loving.

NotFromHere 08-29-2006 01:52 PM
Hot or Not, Minnesota Style
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
That was a very prudent post. Leaving out "SS is dumb" because it's true and thus more hurtful- maybe even outable.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem.

ltl/fb 08-29-2006 01:52 PM
Scissoring
 
Quote:
Originally posted by J. Fred Muggs
No, it's loving.
Especially if they are gorgeous, nubile twins?

NotFromHere 08-29-2006 01:53 PM
Random question
 
Random question for the board...

What's the difference between Darvocet and Vicodin? There's a big V on the Darvocet that leads me to believe the pharmacy gave me the wrong thing.

I have an inflamed partner on my back and need to deal with the pain immediately. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

TIA!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:52 PM.
Page 111 of 126 « First 1161101109110 111 112113121 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com