LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Politics: Where we struggle to kneel in the muck. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=630)

Adder 10-22-2004 12:30 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
This is a cool analogizing experience at face. Substantively, this is total crap.

Did you really say this?
Yeah... I mean, as if there is anything remorely like a far left in this country....

Not Me 10-22-2004 12:34 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Adder
Yeah... I mean, as if there is anything remorely like a far left in this country....
???? Have you ever heard Ralph Nader speak? Michael Moore?

Adder 10-22-2004 12:37 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
I've been too busy to respond substantively today to the porn thread, but does anybody remember what Tipper Gore was famous for before "The Kiss."
She's an idiot. Your point is?

Adder 10-22-2004 12:40 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Me
Are you implying that without a belief in god you can't have principles? If not, what the hell are you saying?
I'm not implying anything. I am saying that if you believe in god simply because you see no downside in not believing in god, you have no principles.

Ad(thought that was pretty clear the first time)der

Hank Chinaski 10-22-2004 12:41 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Adder
It still is nearly inconcievable. But it is a rather common reaction to countries attacted by terrorists. Hopefully, the supreme court will step in and set things straight. But I worry more and more about a court stacked with Ashcroft clones.
quick question!
you know in mikey's movie, where there's the mom whose son was killed in the war; well what if he was killed by one of the people that youse guys made us let go from Gitmo; would Mike have used that footage?

Say_hello_for_me 10-22-2004 12:48 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Adder
She's an idiot. Your point is?
Who are you, and what have you done with Adder?

Not Me 10-22-2004 12:49 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Adder
I'm not implying anything. I am saying that if you believe in god simply because you see no downside in not believing in god, you have no principles.
OK, so reading comprehension isn't your strong point. Read this slowly and maybe it will be more clear. I said that there was no downside to BELIEVING in god.

Quote:

Originally posted by Adder
Ad(thought that was pretty clear the first time)der
I am sure you did think you were clear. However, the point of communication is to be clear to those to whom you are communicating. Got that?

sebastian_dangerfield 10-22-2004 12:57 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
My dear boy, you say my hedge? I'd actually submit that your fear is your hedge. Ironic, no? You be sure to let me know when you aren't afraid of the end, and I'll continue the conversation with the true atheist you've become at that time. Until then, you are the Converted. A Believer so to say. Mass is at 5:00 on Saturday.

ETA: Oops, and I missed that thing about animals. How would you know that animals fear the end? I've seen animals die quite peacefully after being bad their whole lives. We used to have this dog Sandy who was constantly grabbing garbage from a garbage can and then walking by us in the living room while watching us from the corner of her eye, like "come and get me, bitch".

I say you have no explanation for your fear, and you end up speculating on whether animals think about the afterline. My dear, dear, dear friend, did you say my line of reasoning is specious? Holy BeJeezus.
Look, I'm the king of hijacking posts and changing subjects, but when confronted, I honestly debate. I offered a rather simple theory, and you've dishonestly ducked it over and over again.

Belief in god is at its core fear driven, because people want to think there's something out there, somewhere to go after death. You haven't offeered me a single different explantion for belief in god, or anything to refute my theory. In place of debate, you've either purposefully misrepresented my words or are actually an idiot and truly can't follow my simple point. Its not a retort to say "its you, not me, who's afraid."

As to the animal thing, I watched my 16 year old cat get euthanized. They very much understand when they're old and dying, and if you've owned pets you understand this.

I will be afraid at the end. Thats my point, you idiot. Do you have learning disabilities. We all have a fear of the unknown and dying is the great unknown. The difference is you believe you're going somewhere and I'm man enough to admit I don't know if I'm going somewhere, and I'm not fool enough to "belive" I am based on the zero evidence available.

bilmore 10-22-2004 01:16 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
How can I maake it more succinct. Your need to believe in a god is rooted in fear.
I'm Joe Atheist. I've spoken to many gawd-feering types, and I think that the need to believe in a god is rooted in a desire for beauty as much as it is in fear.

Hank Chinaski 10-22-2004 01:16 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I will be afraid at the end. Thats my point, you idiot. Do you have learning disabilities. We all have a fear of the unknown and dying is the great unknown. The difference is you believe you're going somewhere and I'm man enough to admit I don't know if I'm going somewhere, and I'm not fool enough to "belive" I am based on the zero evidence available.
But will you admit I'm right and you'll repent at the end? mohammed Atta probably had a moment, coming up the river, where he started to question whether he'd actually get all the virgins. Fear of death is universal- even for the true believers. people are just asking: don't you admit there is a 1% chance of god?

bilmore 10-22-2004 01:20 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
For the record, I am not that columnist . . .
Did you say this with pride? I would like to be that columnist . . .

bilmore 10-22-2004 01:22 AM

Love me, love me, love me -- I'm a liberal
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Right.
Only living people can add up a national debt.

People who elect Dems won't make it that far.

taxwonk 10-22-2004 01:40 AM

Love me, love me, love me -- I'm a liberal
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Only living people can add up a national debt.

People who elect Dems won't make it that far.
That's right. Dick Cheney will hunt them down and kill them. With Antonin Scalia.

Say_hello_for_me 10-22-2004 01:40 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Did you say this with pride? I would like to be that columnist . . .
It was a long article, and the only part I disclaimed is the part about our country's changed needs, because the part I skimmed seemed to pooh-pooh our nation's need to conduct a robust military offense/defense overseas for the time being.

Hello

bilmore 10-22-2004 01:43 AM

Love me, love me, love me -- I'm a liberal
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
That's right. Dick Cheney will hunt them down and kill them . . .
Oh, hell, his heart would give out in the first flush . . .

(Was that cheap humor? I'll take it back if it was . . .)

Say_hello_for_me 10-22-2004 02:08 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Look, I'm the king of hijacking posts and changing subjects, but when confronted, I honestly debate. I offered a rather simple theory, and you've dishonestly ducked it over and over again.

Belief in god is at its core fear driven, because people want to think there's something out there, somewhere to go after death. You haven't offeered me a single different explantion for belief in god, or anything to refute my theory. In place of debate, you've either purposefully misrepresented my words or are actually an idiot and truly can't follow my simple point. Its not a retort to say "its you, not me, who's afraid."

As to the animal thing, I watched my 16 year old cat get euthanized. They very much understand when they're old and dying, and if you've owned pets you understand this.

I will be afraid at the end. Thats my point, you idiot. Do you have learning disabilities. We all have a fear of the unknown and dying is the great unknown. The difference is you believe you're going somewhere and I'm man enough to admit I don't know if I'm going somewhere, and I'm not fool enough to "belive" I am based on the zero evidence available.
Quick, where's an adult to tell me to go to my room?

You are quite the name-caller, huh pal?

I'm not accusing you of having anything like a "belief" in God. If you took that literally from my post than you should run out and buy a sarcasm meter. I'm accusing you of misrepresenting a belief in Nada, Nothing, Nobody or whatever you said

I should really be able to ignore you. Why can't I ignore you? Please resign from your post as a moderator of a dead board so I can.

It is you who are hedging, and its in stark contrast to your asserted belief in Nada, Nothing, Nobody. You said it, so what words am I putting in your mouth? You also said everybody is afraid of the end. You denying this?

Here's a clue. The two are irreconcilable. You can't deny God entirely (i.e., Nada, Nothing, Nobody) if you can't disclaim a fear of God. You can't be afraid of something that you affirmatively assert does not exist. Nobody is afraid of nothing. Tell me again how your doggy cried for its mommy when it was going to doggy heaven. At best, people are afraid of what is out there in the unknown. In your case, you are afraid of Who you think might be hiding behind door #1. Yup, you are afraid of the possibility of a big, hairy, vengeful God.

Quick, call me some more names and tell me how you didn't say what you said. I'll see you at mass in 2 days, m'kay buddy? You don't mind if I sign you up for the choir, do ya?

ETA "door"

Say_hello_for_me 10-22-2004 02:12 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
don't you admit there is a 1% chance of god?
Of course, what else would he be afraid of in the great everlasting Nada?

Tyrone Slothrop 10-22-2004 02:18 AM

What it means to be a conservative today
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
Which part didn't you believe? Its your papers that said it.
My papers? Each of those papers has their conservative bias as well. Anyway, I've looked at today's NYT, WaPo and LA Times, and I can't figure out what you're talking about. Cite, please.

Tyrone Slothrop 10-22-2004 02:22 AM

October Surprise in Chicago?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
I'll put 1% odds that the real midwest October Surprise is a last-minute preelection arrest of Mayor Richard M. Daley, one of his 3 top lieutenants, and/or Governor Rod Blagoyevich. How much damage would this do to Kerry and co.?
Not much. Obama might be so crippled that he'd win by less than 40, though.

Tyrone Slothrop 10-22-2004 02:23 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
I've been too busy to respond substantively today to the porn thread, but does anybody remember what Tipper Gore was famous for before "The Kiss."
Blow jobs? No wait, that was Nancy Reagan.

bilmore 10-22-2004 02:27 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Blow jobs? No wait, that was Nancy Reagan.
You're really pushing the whole civility thing here.

Tyrone Slothrop 10-22-2004 02:28 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
You're really pushing the whole civility thing here.
It wasn't me who started the discussion of 15" units and Heidi Klum. I'm just trying to fit in.

bilmore 10-22-2004 02:30 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
It wasn't me who started the discussion of 15" units and Heidi Klum. I'm just trying to fit in.
I will take that as your answer.


(ETA - damn, I must be tired. I can't believe I sign a post with my own initials.)

Not Me 10-22-2004 02:39 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Blow jobs? No wait, that was Nancy Reagan.
What is that a reference to? There is no way I believe that Nancy would alllow a dick in her mouth. In case you think I am partisan on this issue, there is no way I would believe that Hilllary would allow a dick in her mouth, either.

Tyrone Slothrop 10-22-2004 02:40 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
I will take that as your answer.
A discussion of Nancy Reagan's best-known talent may be civil, but it is not classy.

Not Me 10-22-2004 02:50 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
classy.
Take it to the FB buster.

Tyrone Slothrop 10-22-2004 02:53 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Me
Take it to the FB buster.
No sooner said than done.

Not Me 10-22-2004 02:58 AM

Caption Contest
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
No sooner said than done.
Well no wonder her hubby never was getting it from a fat intern.

I still don't believe, though, that Hillary has ever had a dick in her mouth or any orifice for that matter. A turkey baster, yeah, sure I believe that.

SlaveNoMore 10-22-2004 03:00 AM

Bait and Switch
 
Quote:

Tyrone Slothrop
Blow jobs? No wait, that was Nancy Reagan.
I pay for Josh, and Wonkette shows up.

bilmore 10-22-2004 03:02 AM

Bait and Switch
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
I pay for Josh, and Wonkette shows up.
You pay for Josh?

Goddam good thing you were busy last time I was there.

Tyrone Slothrop 10-22-2004 03:04 AM

Bait and Switch
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
I pay for Josh, and Wonkette shows up.
Which reminds me -- Josh says you need to give me money for wine or you're not going to be happy. I don't know whether this means he's not going to post or he's going to post more.

bilmore 10-22-2004 03:07 AM

Bait and Switch
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I don't know whether this means he's not going to post or he's going to post more.
Oh, damn, I LOVE Jeopardy!!

Here, here -

"What is a Hobson's choice"?

(ETA - what do I win?)

Tyrone Slothrop 10-22-2004 03:09 AM

Bait and Switch
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Oh, damn, I LOVE Jeopardy!!

Here, here -

"What is a Hobson's choice"?

(ETA - what do I win?)
You get bone chips in your elbow and fired as the manager of the Red Sox?

Say_hello_for_me 10-22-2004 03:12 AM

What it means to be a conservative today
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
My papers? Each of those papers has their conservative bias as well. Anyway, I've looked at today's NYT, WaPo and LA Times, and I can't figure out what you're talking about. Cite, please.
What's today buddy-boy?

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/21/in...ner=ALTAVISTA1

Not Me 10-22-2004 03:15 AM

Bait and Switch
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Oh, damn, I LOVE Jeopardy!!

Here, here -

"What is a Hobson's choice"?

(ETA - what do I win?)
Nothing. Who the fuck is Hobson? Do you mean Hobbesian choice?

bilmore 10-22-2004 03:18 AM

Bait and Switch
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Me
Nothing. Who the fuck is Hobson? Do you mean Hobbesian choice?
What are you, like, thirty-four?

Hobson. Google it. Effin kids.

Tyrone Slothrop 10-22-2004 03:21 AM

What it means to be a conservative today
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
What's today buddy-boy?

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/21/in...ner=ALTAVISTA1
Much other reporting has suggested that the decision to disband the Iraqi Army has made in Washington, above Bremer's head. Consistent with this, the article you cite quotes Douglas Feith in defense of the policy. Then there are these paragraphs:
  • The role of top Bush administration officials in approving the plan is unclear. Mr. Slocombe said the decision was the subject of extensive consultations with senior Defense Department officials in Washington. A draft of Mr. Bremer's decree abolishing the army, he said, was sent to Mr. Rumsfeld before it was issued.

    Lawrence Di Rita, Mr. Rumsfeld's spokesman, said in an e-mail message that the issue was not taken up by cabinet-level officials and was "definitely not one that the secretary of defense decided."

    General Peter Pace of the Marines, the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the Joint Chiefs were not consulted about the decision.

    Condoleezza Rice, Mr. Bush's national security adviser, indicated that the idea did not originate in the National Security Council but acknowledged that the White House did not object.

    "I don't think that anybody thought it was wildly out of context with what we were trying to achieve and the whole structure had been set up so that some of those decisions could be made in the field or through the Pentagon chain," she said in an interview.

The article continues to explain that the military didn't like it. And then there's this:
  • General Garner, who was winding up his service in Iraq at that time, was also opposed. He said he had not been given advance notice of the plan. "What was happening was that hundreds of Iraqi soldiers were just beginning to come back," Mr. Garner said. "We could have brought back and paired them up in former units. Instead, we just shut the door on them."

So the decision was made while General Garner "was winding up his service in Iraq"? Bremer wasn't in charge yet, but he somehow made this decision? Yeah, right.

This is too cute by half. I don't know where the idea "originated," but if you think it wasn't made in the White House, that bridge is still for sale. Oddly, the article never explains who actually made the decision. It's just a bunch of different guys pointing the finger at each other.

Not Me 10-22-2004 03:24 AM

Bait and Switch
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
What are you, like, thirty-four?

Hobson. Google it. Effin kids.
Well if you read my title, you would see I am too lazy to google. But when I did muster up the energy to google, this is what I got:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=Hobson

bilmore 10-22-2004 03:25 AM

What it means to be a conservative today
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
This is too cute by half. I don't know where the idea "originated," but if you think it wasn't made in the White House, that bridge is still for sale. Oddly, the article never explains who actually made the decision. It's just a bunch of different guys pointing the finger at each other.
I'm old, and my memory fades, but wasn't the decision made when they realized that, one, the invasion had gone too fast, and, two, that left whole regiments intact and eager to fight under-the-table against us, and, three, they had to redesign from the top down?

I love hindsight. If I could live by it in my job, I wouldn't have to rely on posting for a salary.

Not Me 10-22-2004 03:26 AM

What it means to be a conservative today
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Much other reporting has suggested that the decision to disband the Iraqi Army has made in Washington, above Bremer's head. Consistent with this, the article you cite quotes Douglas Feith in defense of the policy. Then there are these paragraphs:
  • The role of top Bush administration officials in approving the plan is unclear. Mr. Slocombe said the decision was the subject of extensive consultations with senior Defense Department officials in Washington. A draft of Mr. Bremer's decree abolishing the army, he said, was sent to Mr. Rumsfeld before it was issued.

    Lawrence Di Rita, Mr. Rumsfeld's spokesman, said in an e-mail message that the issue was not taken up by cabinet-level officials and was "definitely not one that the secretary of defense decided."

    General Peter Pace of the Marines, the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the Joint Chiefs were not consulted about the decision.

    Condoleezza Rice, Mr. Bush's national security adviser, indicated that the idea did not originate in the National Security Council but acknowledged that the White House did not object.

    "I don't think that anybody thought it was wildly out of context with what we were trying to achieve and the whole structure had been set up so that some of those decisions could be made in the field or through the Pentagon chain," she said in an interview.

The article continues to explain that the military didn't like it. And then there's this:
  • General Garner, who was winding up his service in Iraq at that time, was also opposed. He said he had not been given advance notice of the plan. "What was happening was that hundreds of Iraqi soldiers were just beginning to come back," Mr. Garner said. "We could have brought back and paired them up in former units. Instead, we just shut the door on them."

So the decision was made while General Garner "was winding up his service in Iraq"? Bremer wasn't in charge yet, but he somehow made this decision? Yeah, right.

This is too cute by half. I don't know where the idea "originated," but if you think it wasn't made in the White House, that bridge is still for sale. Oddly, the article never explains who actually made the decision. It's just a bunch of different guys pointing the finger at each other.
Just as a warning to the rest of you, I read through what Ty has posted, and there is no porn at all in it. Just a warning.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:50 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com