LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Meet your new thread, same as the old thread. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=781)

Secret_Agent_Man 01-03-2008 06:17 PM

Ron Paul supporters rally in World of Warcraft
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Some?

Besides - Paul isn't really a libertarian. He spouts a few mantras here and there, but at heart, he's really a populist xenophobe.
Likely the qualities winning him the "racialist" vote.

S_A_M

SlaveNoMore 01-03-2008 06:18 PM

Here's an unofficial poll for you
 
Quote:

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
I'm not committed yet.
How can you not be? The only thing left for either of them - hell, any candidate - to do is fuck up. Their positions are set.

LessinSF 01-03-2008 06:19 PM

Here's an unofficial poll for you
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
I'm not committed yet. But I consider it an abundance of riches - I truly like both Hillary and Obama. I have not warmed to Edwards.
It's hard to warm to a screamer, particularly if you have ever worked in a law firm.

Secret_Agent_Man 01-03-2008 06:19 PM

Ron Paul supporters rally in World of Warcraft
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
Personally, I tend to find that if you poke them, most libertarians are just greedy motherfuckers whose sole political philosophy is "I got mine, I'm keeping it."
That fits the ones I knew -- but it was a very small sample size.

S_A_M

SlaveNoMore 01-03-2008 06:19 PM

Ron Paul supporters rally in World of Warcraft
 
Quote:

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
The man has two wholly transparent characteristics: (1) he stands for absolutely nothing, and is a pure opportunist; and (2) he would sell his own daughter into slavery if it benefited him.
Actually, this sums up Edwards quite well.

Secret_Agent_Man 01-03-2008 06:30 PM

Here's an unofficial poll for you
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
How many of you right now are actually supporting SOMEONE?

I'm not talking about the ostensible nominee for your party - hell, 2008 is shaping up to be a repeat of 2004; namely, most people will merely vote AGAINST the nominee of the other party*

I have said countless times I am FOR Giuliani.

I think it is safe to say that Ty is FOR Obama.

But is anyone else out there seriously and actually committed to any of these folks?
I am FOR Hillary in a lukewarm sense. (Which may be your point.)

As for the others, I like Obama a lot but have concerns. I have many more concerns about Edwards, and like him less. I would be happier with HRC than with either of these two.

S_A_M

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 01-03-2008 06:30 PM

Here's an unofficial poll for you
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
How can you not be? The only thing left for either of them - hell, any candidate - to do is fuck up. Their positions are set.
As a general rule, I spend money on general elections, not primaries. And so I don't have to make up my mind until it's time to walk into the polling booth a few weeks from now. If I had to make up my mind today, I'd vote for Hillary based not just on her experience, but also on her constancy over the years and the impressions I've had meeting her. She had a depth of knowledge about some of the issues we were discussing that was impressive on any level and rare in a politician. She is clearly presidential timber.

I have not yet met Obama, and if he can stand up over time, and can keep running a campaign like he is now, he might well be even better.

Gattigap 01-03-2008 06:38 PM

I like Obama. He's the only one in the field that I can stand listening to anymore.

Among his other sins, I think Edwards has jumped the shark recently with his All Populism, All the Time message.

I cannot bear the thought of reliving the Clinton Drama for another 4 to 8 years.

On the Republican side, Romney is a cipher, and a transparent one at that, but it seems that he has the potential to be a competent president if it comes to that.

I admit to liking McCain a little because, well, I still have a soft spot for the guy, despite the neoconservative knucklehead that he's turned out to be.

Huckabee is fun to watch, in part because he'll play a role in destroying what's left of the Reagan coalition, but he doesn't really know what he's doing as a candidate, and he's not gonna win anything in any event. He'll have his day in the sun in Iowa, and maybe South Carolina, but far as I can tell, he doesn't have anything approaching a national campaign apparatus, and I think you still need one to actually win a nomination.

Tyrone Slothrop 01-03-2008 06:53 PM

Here's an unofficial poll for you
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
As a general rule, I spend money on general elections, not primaries. And so I don't have to make up my mind until it's time to walk into the polling booth a few weeks from now. If I had to make up my mind today, I'd vote for Hillary based not just on her experience, but also on her constancy over the years and the impressions I've had meeting her. She had a depth of knowledge about some of the issues we were discussing that was impressive on any level and rare in a politician. She is clearly presidential timber.
I would like HRC more if she weren't in a permanent defensive crouch. She may even have good reasons for the posture, given all the shit she's received over the years, but that doesn't mean I want to vote for her.

SlaveNoMore 01-03-2008 07:28 PM

Quote:

Gattigap
I like Obama. He's the only one in the field that I can stand listening to anymore.
He seems like a genuinely nice guy. I'd invite him to dinner, but wouldn't vote for him

Quote:

Among his other sins, I think Edwards has jumped the shark recently with his All Populism, All the Time message.
Given his background, it comes across as satire

Quote:

I cannot bear the thought of reliving the Clinton Drama for another 4 to 8 years.
You ain't kidding, although she is the most "leader-like" of the Dems

Quote:

On the Republican side, Romney is a cipher, and a transparent one at that, but it seems that he has the potential to be a competent president if it comes to that.
I don't disagree with the cipher comment, but I think it's an unfortunate consequence of candidates all pandering to 250K otherwise unimportant citizens of Iowa.

Quote:

I admit to liking McCain a little because, well, I still have a soft spot for the guy, despite the neoconservative knucklehead that he's turned out to be.
He's a hero, and gives great TV, but I hate 2/3s of his positions and would rather have a beer with Obama. Or Cheney.

Quote:

Huckabee is fun to watch, in part because he'll play a role in destroying what's left of the Reagan coalition, but he doesn't really know what he's doing as a candidate, and he's not gonna win anything in any event. He'll have his day in the sun in Iowa, and maybe South Carolina, but far as I can tell, he doesn't have anything approaching a national campaign apparatus, and I think you still need one to actually win a nomination.
In the end - concur. He's a two-trick pony, if that. Crashes faster than Dean. Or Buchanan.

Diane_Keaton 01-03-2008 08:31 PM

Ron Paul supporters rally in World of Warcraft
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
I don't think there is anything per se wrong with wanting to keep what you have. My objection is the people who pay $20,000 a year to put a kid in private school, but vote against a $250 increase in their property tax bill to pay for building a public school.
IMHO you don't have to explain this at all. I took it as you criticizing folks who see things only as "me, me, me, mine, mine, mine" taxwise. Hopefully, Sebby is on board with the idea that to be a municipality, state or country that functions well, then everyone has to ante up (in whatever way makes most sense) for not just schools but to rush your drunken ass to the hospital when your liver goes early. Spread out the risk. If someone truly wants to "keep" all of what he/she earned, that someone better move to Lancaster and grow a long beard where you can "opt out" and keep all your wood carved piggies to yourself.** Or you can go the illegal opt-out route and become a Hassidim (own schools/even private docs). Same long beard, but closer to the City and Yiddish is easier than German (plus you get speedy Lubuvitcher ambulance drivers instead of those damn slow horses). Until then, people who bitch about taxes in general are better served coming up with specific ways to make levying them "more fair."

**Of course, an opt out would never work or even a line-item tax bill since most would "opt out" of things like First Aid squad and other shit but then they'd cry foul when left 1/2 dead on the side of the road. It already happens with health care insurance opt-outs who show up in ER and demand free care anyway.

sebastian_dangerfield 01-03-2008 09:16 PM

Ron Paul supporters rally in World of Warcraft
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
IMHO you don't have to explain this at all. I took it as you criticizing folks who see things only as "me, me, me, mine, mine, mine" taxwise. Hopefully, Sebby is on board with the idea that to be a municipality, state or country that functions well, then everyone has to ante up (in whatever way makes most sense) for not just schools but to rush your drunken ass to the hospital when your liver goes early. Spread out the risk. If someone truly wants to "keep" all of what he/she earned, that someone better move to Lancaster and grow a long beard where you can "opt out" and keep all your wood carved piggies to yourself.** Or you can go the illegal opt-out route and become a Hassidim (own schools/even private docs). Same long beard, but closer to the City and Yiddish is easier than German (plus you get speedy Lubuvitcher ambulance drivers instead of those damn slow horses). Until then, people who bitch about taxes in general are better served coming up with specific ways to make levying them "more fair."

**Of course, an opt out would never work or even a line-item tax bill since most would "opt out" of things like First Aid squad and other shit but then they'd cry foul when left 1/2 dead on the side of the road. It already happens with health care insurance opt-outs who show up in ER and demand free care anyway.
Nova Lox is one of my favorite foods, I know a bit of Yiddish and don't like shaving too much...

But seriously, I don't have a problem with paying a fair share of taxes. I don't know how the debate got warped into that.

sebastian_dangerfield 01-03-2008 09:25 PM

Ron Paul supporters rally in World of Warcraft
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
It's largely the fact that I've given the nuanced, detailed explanations a million times already. I'm not in favor of wealth redistribution. I'm opposed to people who don't deserve them getting tax breaks.

I don't think that CSX dividends (earned by someone else's grandaprents maybe, mine ran a drugstore) should be taxed at a lower rate than the salary I earn or the hourly wage a stockboy earns at Wa-Mart.

I also think it's bullshit to try and characterize capital gains as money that has already been taxed. You don't get taxed on what you put in, that's called basis and you recover it before teh first penny is taxed as capital gain. I don't think we need to provide an incentive for people to make money. And I think that if we do, then we should provide me an incentive to show up every day and earn my paycheck.

The last point, by the way, is one of the things we agree on. Steve Schwartzmann, Henry Kravis, and Leon Black are getting a break on their paychecks. We both think that's wrong.

You were right, there are a lot of things we agree on and a lot we disagree on. You've seen me say all this before. You should know better than to lump me in with somebody who thinks that every family in America with an income over $250,000 should be forced to buy a car and a color tv for a Mom on welfare with 15 kids.
Taking away the lower capital gains rate is an unfair wealth redistribution. No matter how you slice it, it is penalizing success, killing the margins for people who have accumulated capital, and for what? To what glorious end? To fuck up Wall Street and hand the money to the government to waste?

It's also insanely reckless considering our country's awful savings rate. Are you really suggesting we should force more older people back into the work force? Are you really suggesting we should carve more money for our "government" out of retirees' hides? The last thing we need to be doing in this country is taking money AWAY from people who have diligently planned and saved in part based on the knowledge that a large part of their reitrement income would be taxed at a discounted rate. You're hurting the older members of the middle class. I don't see how you can say that is fair.

BTW, I did not lump you into the group of people desiring HDTV for welfare mothers. You've debated with me enough to know that. Your appetite for progressive taxation is far from that, but I still say its a form of wealth redistribution.

sebastian_dangerfield 01-03-2008 09:28 PM

Here's an unofficial poll for you
 
Quote:

Originally posted by LessinSF
It's hard to warm to a screamer, particularly if you have ever worked in a law firm.
Dissent. Screamers are wonderful. It's the moaners who are disturbing.

Diane_Keaton 01-03-2008 10:43 PM

Ron Paul supporters rally in World of Warcraft
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
But seriously, I don't have a problem with paying a fair share of taxes. I don't know how the debate got warped into that.
I thought someone was talking about protesting the payment of taxes (not just a portion). Oh nevermind.

Atticus Grinch 01-03-2008 10:46 PM

Groucho Marxism
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Hell no. Ain't much use for tax planning and lawyering in a Socialist system.
Nor, I would note, in a Libertarian one.

Hank Chinaski 01-03-2008 11:08 PM

Groucho Marxism
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
I've said that before. Forget about ethanol, just take farm subsidies period. I don't think we should be paying farmers not to grow food while people are starving.
obesity is a bigger problem in the states than starvation.

taxwonk 01-04-2008 12:07 AM

Ron Paul supporters rally in World of Warcraft
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Taking away the lower capital gains rate is an unfair wealth redistribution. No matter how you slice it, it is penalizing success, killing the margins for people who have accumulated capital, and for what? To what glorious end? To fuck up Wall Street and hand the money to the government to waste?

It's also insanely reckless considering our country's awful savings rate. Are you really suggesting we should force more older people back into the work force? Are you really suggesting we should carve more money for our "government" out of retirees' hides? The last thing we need to be doing in this country is taking money AWAY from people who have diligently planned and saved in part based on the knowledge that a large part of their reitrement income would be taxed at a discounted rate. You're hurting the older members of the middle class. I don't see how you can say that is fair.

BTW, I did not lump you into the group of people desiring HDTV for welfare mothers. You've debated with me enough to know that. Your appetite for progressive taxation is far from that, but I still say its a form of wealth redistribution.
It's not taking money away from people who have saved. I'm just saying that the same tax should be imposed on income from investment as from salary or wages. As for retirees, if they are counting on the income from savings being taxed at a lower rate, they get that through (i) a lower marginal rate on their lower retirement income and (ii) the appreciation for their working years tax-free.

sebastian_dangerfield 01-04-2008 12:08 AM

Groucho Marxism
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Nor, I would note, in a Libertarian one.
I'm not aware of many Libertarians favoring abolition of the Court system.

Tyrone Slothrop 01-04-2008 12:31 AM

I'm biased, but Obama rocked tonight, didn't he?

LessinSF 01-04-2008 12:43 AM

Obama
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I'm biased, but Obama rocked tonight, didn't he?
Women voted for him 35% to Hillary's 30%. Independents were something like 57-17. She is going to get killed in N.H., where independents can vote in in the Dem. primary. She is going to get killed in S.Carolina, which is 50% black on the Dem. side. I can't wait to see the new odds tomorrow.

eta: Michigan is on 1/15, and she will be probably be beaten there too.

sebastian_dangerfield 01-04-2008 12:47 AM

Ron Paul supporters rally in World of Warcraft
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
It's not taking money away from people who have saved. I'm just saying that the same tax should be imposed on income from investment as from salary or wages. As for retirees, if they are counting on the income from savings being taxed at a lower rate, they get that through (i) a lower marginal rate on their lower retirement income and (ii) the appreciation for their working years tax-free.
How does that make for losing the lower cap gains rate pre-retirement?

Hank Chinaski 01-04-2008 12:59 AM

Obama
 
Quote:

Originally posted by LessinSF

eta: Michigan is on 1/15, and she will be probably be beaten there too.
I thought all the Dems pulled out of Michigan to punish us for changing the date.

SlaveNoMore 01-04-2008 01:07 AM

Quote:

Tyrone Slothrop
I'm biased, but Obama rocked tonight, didn't he?
"Iowa picks corn; New Hampshire picks Presidents"

SlaveNoMore 01-04-2008 01:15 AM

Obama
 
Quote:

LessinSF
eta: Michigan is on 1/15, and she will be probably be beaten there too.
Doubtful. She's the only Dem running.

LessinSF 01-04-2008 01:19 AM

Obama
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I thought all the Dems pulled out of Michigan to punish us for changing the date.
You are right, and I had forgot that, but It seems a little unclear here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States)_presidential_primaries,_2008 - as to whether candidates cannot campaign there (or Florida) and/or whether their delegates cannot vote. Nonetheless, perceptions based upon the only two large states to vote before 2/5 may matter.

sebastian_dangerfield 01-04-2008 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I'm biased, but Obama rocked tonight, didn't he?
If this keeps up he's going to have to get himself a platform one of these days. I like the guy's somewhat centrist vibe, but "hope" and "change" are a little vague.

I want to bang Chuck Norris' wife (blonde behind Huckabee during speech).

Gattigap 01-04-2008 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I'm biased, but Obama rocked tonight, didn't he?
Yep. Everything Obama needed to happen - young people, independents, some Republicans coming out to caucus who historically never do, but did tonight - happened. Big, big win.

And he gave a great speech.

Atticus Grinch 01-04-2008 01:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I want to bang Chuck Norris' wife (blonde behind Huckabee during speech).
Go for it. "Chuck Norris's tears cure cancer" may be the best answer Huckabee has for a health care platform.

Atticus Grinch 01-04-2008 01:32 AM

Ron Paul supporters rally in World of Warcraft
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
IMHO you don't have to explain this at all. I took it as you criticizing folks who see things only as "me, me, me, mine, mine, mine" taxwise. Hopefully, Sebby is on board with the idea that to be a municipality, state or country that functions well, then everyone has to ante up (in whatever way makes most sense) for not just schools but to rush your drunken ass to the hospital when your liver goes early. Spread out the risk. If someone truly wants to "keep" all of what he/she earned, that someone better move to Lancaster and grow a long beard where you can "opt out" and keep all your wood carved piggies to yourself.** Or you can go the illegal opt-out route and become a Hassidim (own schools/even private docs). Same long beard, but closer to the City and Yiddish is easier than German (plus you get speedy Lubuvitcher ambulance drivers instead of those damn slow horses). Until then, people who bitch about taxes in general are better served coming up with specific ways to make levying them "more fair."

**Of course, an opt out would never work or even a line-item tax bill since most would "opt out" of things like First Aid squad and other shit but then they'd cry foul when left 1/2 dead on the side of the road. It already happens with health care insurance opt-outs who show up in ER and demand free care anyway.
2. All government is essentially a risk pool. Either you want low premiums or you want covered claims. Can't have both. Period.

Libertarians don't have a good answer for who provides the schizophrenics with the padded room and who takes custody of the abused kids. Life ain't Little House on the Prairie. If you thought Victorian London was a paradise, vote Paul.

Hank Chinaski 01-04-2008 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gattigap
Yep. Everything Obama needed to happen - young people, independents, some Republicans coming out to caucus who historically never do, but did tonight - happened. Big, big win.

And he gave a great speech.
didn't he say he wants to attack Iran? or is flat out lying okay for you guys?

Atticus Grinch 01-04-2008 01:37 AM

Groucho Marxism
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I'm not aware of many Libertarians favoring abolition of the Court system.
Can you parse this for me? "Transitional Action: Repeal all laws that presume government knows better than the individual how to run that person’s life." Link. If you don't start with Article III, there's nowhere to start at all.

Gattigap 01-04-2008 01:40 AM

Ron Paul supporters rally in World of Warcraft
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
2. All government is essentially a risk pool. Either you want low premiums or you want covered claims. Can't have both. Period.

Libertarians don't have a good answer for who provides the schizophrenics with the padded room and who takes custody of the abused kids. Life ain't Little House on the Prairie. If you thought Victorian London was a paradise, vote Paul.
POTD.

Tyrone Slothrop 01-04-2008 01:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
didn't he say he wants to attack Iran?
Was that a subliminal message in tonight's speech that I missed? Now that I think about it, I bought an awful lot of popcorn tonight.

Gattigap 01-04-2008 01:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
didn't he say he wants to attack Iran? or is flat out lying okay for you guys?
I don't remember that part. Bombing Pakistan, sure, but Iran?

Educate me.

Hank Chinaski 01-04-2008 01:42 AM

Groucho Marxism
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Can you parse this for me? "Transitional Action: Repeal all laws that presume government knows better than the individual how to run that person’s life." Link. If you don't start with Article III, there's nowhere to start at all.
are you saying that for Libertarians 9/11 wasn't even a simple crime?

Hank Chinaski 01-04-2008 01:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Was that a subliminal message in tonight's speech that I missed? Now that I think about it, I bought an awful lot of popcorn tonight.
doesn't everything he said since starting to run count, or does he get a pass like Kerry did with his medals?

Gattigap 01-04-2008 01:48 AM

Shorter Iowa Analysis
 
  • Obama looks like he's won by a fairly significant margin. Romney, by contrast, has been caucus blocked.

Beutler

Atticus Grinch 01-04-2008 01:52 AM

Groucho Marxism
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
are you saying that for Libertarians 9/11 wasn't even a simple crime?
It's their fucking platform. Ask them whether it's empty rhetoric, not me.

Tyrone Slothrop 01-04-2008 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
doesn't everything he said since starting to run count, or does he get a pass like Kerry did with his medals?
I never thought Kerry's military service was a reason to vote against him -- that was Slave.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:51 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com