LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   A Forum for Grinches and Ho-Ho-Hoes (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=643)

futbol fan 03-10-2005 02:46 PM

Central America
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
The water company is providing a service, and the customers don't like it. Not surprizing, because, like you said, the company is French. Any company that does not satisfy its customers should be sent the way of the dodo bird. I was talking about a company setting up a factory in a country and "exploiting the workers". The only people that bitch about the exploitation are people that are not from the community. When Ford opened its plant in Costa Rica you didn't see the residents bitching about the new jobs and the new money flowing through the local economy.
The water company doesn't employ anyone?:confused: Oh shit - we have a robot gap with France!!!

Hank Chinaski 03-10-2005 02:52 PM

Central America
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
The water company doesn't employ anyone?:confused: Oh shit - we have a robot gap with France!!!
Nothing so dire- most of these French "companies" are just sham fronts to funnel Iraq oil for food money to the Chiacs or Annans.

ltl/fb 03-10-2005 02:54 PM

Central America
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
The water company doesn't employ anyone?:confused: Oh shit - we have a robot gap with France!!!
Maybe it's just that annoying Jerry Lewis guy or whatever his name is, playing a robot, and not *real* robots.

Spanky 03-10-2005 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
If you made it through volumes one, two and three, I am truly impressed. I was impressed with myself for finishing The Power Broker. Which is an incredible book -- everyone should read it.
Have you read them? Its not that impressive. Caro paints Johnson to be like Satan. It is way over the top. It reads more like fiction than a scholarly work. So it makes it a really fun read (although factually dubious). I read the first volume when it came out. I then had to wait for the second and then the third. He takes time out between volumes, writes other books, goes on vacation and other completely unacceptible stuff. It is like being in the middle of a Ludlum thriller and then having to wait two years for the ending. I wouldn't start them until the fourth one comes out.

sgtclub 03-10-2005 02:57 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Really? I can't believe that. There just aren't that many hybrids on the road, even in the crunchy area I live, and while they get better mileage, they still burn gas.
Really, that's why there's a CA bill being proposed to tax based on miles driven.

futbol fan 03-10-2005 03:00 PM

A Uniter, Not A Divider
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Nothing so dire- most of these French "companies" are just sham fronts to funnel Iraq oil for food money to the Chiacs or Annans.
When I think of all the American "companies" that are just sham fronts to funnel federal tax money into the pockets of heavyweight Republican campaign contributors, I wonder: why must we always focus on what divides us from the French when our cultures are so similar? Why, Hank, why?

bilmore 03-10-2005 03:00 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Really? I can't believe that. There just aren't that many hybrids on the road, even in the crunchy area I live, and while they get better mileage, they still burn gas.
Think of tolls as the libertarian's gas tax. With tolls, you can impose a rationally-based, per-mile user fee, without the coercive "buy an efficient car" impact of the gas tax.

ltl/fb 03-10-2005 03:04 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Think of tolls as the libertarian's gas tax. With tolls, you can impose a rationally-based, per-mile user fee, without the coercive "buy an efficient car" impact of the gas tax.
No, it's a coercive "drive less" impact of the mileage tax.

Really, why is the activity being taxed? Because of wear and tear on the roads and pollution, right? So the tax should be a fancy combo of fuel burned, what type of emission system the vehicle has, the weight of the vehicle (including whatever is in it, on average), and the miles driven. If noise pollution is a factor, the amount of external noise the car produces should be factored in.

Spanky 03-10-2005 03:06 PM

Central America
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
The water company doesn't employ anyone?:confused: Oh shit - we have a robot gap with France!!!
So let me get this straight - if my local water company was owned by a french company, and the local community started receiving brown water after a price increase - and we decide to lobby to get the company out - we are not really upset about the water or the price- deep down what we are really upset about is that the French are exploiting our local workers. In other words, we would be OK with brown expensive water as long as it was provided by an American company.

Spanky 03-10-2005 03:10 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
No, it's a coercive "drive less" impact of the mileage tax.

Really, why is the activity being taxed? Because of wear and tear on the roads and pollution, right? So the tax should be a fancy combo of fuel burned, what type of emission system the vehicle has, the weight of the vehicle (including whatever is in it, on average), and the miles driven. If noise pollution is a factor, the amount of external noise the car produces should be factored in.
I will go along with that as long as we tax those stupid Harleys 10 dollars a mile for all the noize they make.

taxwonk 03-10-2005 03:10 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Really? I can't believe that. There just aren't that many hybrids on the road, even in the crunchy area I live, and while they get better mileage, they still burn gas.
I heard it on the radio a couple weeks ago. Some state legislator is proposing to fix the problem by forcing all hybrids to be equipped with GPS devices that will track the miles driveen by the hybrid (Hello, Big Brother) and automatically assessing a use tax based on the mileage at the pump.

ltl/fb 03-10-2005 03:12 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
I will go along with that as long as we tax those stupid Harleys 10 dollars a mile for all the noize they make.
You don't see any transaction cost issues with my proposed tax?

Spanky 03-10-2005 03:14 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
I heard it on the radio a couple weeks ago. Some state legislator is proposing to fix the problem by forcing all hybrids to be equipped with GPS devices that will track the miles driveen by the hybrid (Hello, Big Brother) and automatically assessing a use tax based on the mileage at the pump.
Why are just the Hybrids getting the GPS device? Is it so the Hybrids pay just as much tax even though they are using less gas and putting out less pollution. If that is the case it is time to recall that legislator.

Spanky 03-10-2005 03:16 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
You don't see any transaction cost issues with my proposed tax?
Yes - I see a few problems - but I just want to get rid of the loud Harleys. I love the idea, in theory, of a noise tax.

ltl/fb 03-10-2005 03:17 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Yes - I see a few problems - but I just want to get rid of the loud Harleys. I love the idea, in theory, of a noise tax.
That's their property and they can use it however they like, dammit.

Tyrone Slothrop 03-10-2005 03:20 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Think of tolls as the libertarian's gas tax. With tolls, you can impose a rationally-based, per-mile user fee, without the coercive "buy an efficient car" impact of the gas tax.
Since we all should be able to agree that there are externalities associated with the consumption of gas (defense spending, etc.), surely even most libertarians should be able to agree that it makes sense to discourage gas consumption.

I tend to do more driving on city streets than interstates, so a switch from the gas tax to tolls would presumably benefit me. But I find stopping at tolls so irritating that I would rather pay at the pump.

Sexual Harassment Panda 03-10-2005 03:20 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
I will go along with that as long as we tax those stupid Harleys 10 dollars a mile for all the noize they make.
2.

Plus the asswipes who pull up next to you with the bass pounding loud enough to sterilize frogs at 100 yards. The only comfort there is their hearing is going, going, gone.

Spanky 03-10-2005 03:21 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
That's their property and they can use it however they like, dammit.
Is it OK if I exercise my property rights by buying a Humvee and running over them all on the highway. I would even be willing to pay a usage tax for every Harley I run over, for the extra burden on the sanitation department for the cleanup.

Hank Chinaski 03-10-2005 03:24 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Since we all should be able to agree that there are externalities associated with the consumption of gas (defense spending, etc.), surely even most libertarians should be able to agree that it makes sense to discourage gas consumption.

I tend to do more driving on city streets than interstates, so a switch from the gas tax to tolls would presumably benefit me. But I find stopping at tolls so irritating that I would rather pay at the pump.
Look at gas milages that were puffed during Carter after the "gas crisis." The milages were 30-40 MPG. Now with the advanced technology of hybrids we get? That's right. The advanced tech let's us have bigger cars is all.

Spanky 03-10-2005 03:25 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sexual Harassment Panda
2.

Plus the asswipes who pull up next to you with the bass pounding loud enough to sterilize frogs at 100 yards. The only comfort there is their hearing is going, going, gone.
Amen to that. You know I heard all the amphibians were disappearing. Now I know why. Those poor frogs. Having you sex life ruined by Tupac.

Sexual Harassment Panda 03-10-2005 03:26 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Look at gas milages that were puffed during Carter after the "gas crisis." The milages were 30-40 MPG. Now with the advanced technology of hybrids we get? That's right. The advanced tech let's us have bigger cars is all.
Amazing what happens when you don't try.

Spanky 03-10-2005 03:32 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Look at gas milages that were puffed during Carter after the "gas crisis." The milages were 30-40 MPG. Now with the advanced technology of hybrids we get? That's right. The advanced tech let's us have bigger cars is all.
The market in this country (and the rest of the world for that matter) is severly distorted by all the pollution externalities. You have to pay to have your trash disposed of but you can dump all this stuff in the air and not have to pay for it. Its crazy. There should be some cost associated with dumping all this stuff into the public domain. If people don't want to pay for it they can just put big ballons on the end of their exhaust pipes, and take that crap back to their house - and keep it indoors.

ltl/fb 03-10-2005 03:33 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
The market in this country (and the rest of the world for that matter) is severly distorted by all the pollution externalities. You have to pay to have your trash disposed of but you can dump all this stuff in the air and not have to pay for it. Its crazy. There should be some cost associated with dumping all this stuff into the public domain. If people don't want to pay for it they can just put big ballons on the end of their exhaust pipes, and take that crap back to their house - and keep it indoors.
Um, isn't this the gas tax? Tax on the pollution?

Hank Chinaski 03-10-2005 03:40 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
The market in this country (and the rest of the world for that matter) is severly distorted by all the pollution externalities. You have to pay to have your trash disposed of but you can dump all this stuff in the air and not have to pay for it. Its crazy. There should be some cost associated with dumping all this stuff into the public domain. If people don't want to pay for it they can just put big ballons on the end of their exhaust pipes, and take that crap back to their house - and keep it indoors.
When I was at the PTO, a guy invented this propulsion system where a motor turned this vane and the vane whipped ball bearings at a belt. The belt was fixed to a vehicle frame, and so the vehicle would go! The vane was supposed to catch the ball after it hit the belt and reuse it. It would have been pollutionless cars and fast. He couldn't work out the "catch part." (it would violate thermo laws if he did).

But anyway he said" 20 years from now you'll all be driving these." See if that had proven true there'd be ball bearings- big-assed ones- flowing out the back of cars and you'd need to go fill up with them at "BB stations,"

Roads would be full of these used ones and it would be a real mess, and slippery and just really unpleasant to move through. Sort of like the PB when SS is posting lots.

Spanky 03-10-2005 03:41 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Um, isn't this the gas tax? Tax on the pollution?
Sort of but not really. It does not take into account how efficiently the gas is used. Different engines put out a different amount of exhaust per gallon. In addition, a lot of other products produce pollution and have no tax on them.

Spanky 03-10-2005 03:43 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
When I was at the PTO, a guy invented this propulsion system where a motor turned this vane and the vane whipped ball bearings at a belt. The belt was fixed to a vehicle frame, and so the vehicle would go! The vane was supposed to catch the ball after it hit the belt and reuse it. It would have been pollutionless cars and fast. He couldn't work out the "catch part." (it would violate thermo laws if he did).

But anyway he said" 20 years from now you'll all be driving these." See if that had proven true there'd be ball bearings- big-assed ones- flowing out the back of cars and you'd need to go fill up with them at "BB stations,"

Roads would be full of these used ones and it would be a real mess, and slippery and just really unpleasant to move through. Sort of like the PB when SS is posting lots.
Yes but at least I wouldn't have to breath them.

Tyrone Slothrop 03-10-2005 03:43 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
When I was at the PTO, a guy invented this propulsion system where a motor turned this vane and the vane whipped ball bearings at a belt. The belt was fixed to a vehicle frame, and so the vehicle would go! The vane was supposed to catch the ball after it hit the belt and reuse it. It would have been pollutionless cars and fast. He couldn't work out the "catch part." (it would violate thermo laws if he did).

But anyway he said" 20 years from now you'll all be driving these." See if that had proven true there'd be ball bearings- big-assed ones- flowing out the back of cars and you'd need to go fill up with them at "BB stations,"

Roads would be full of these used ones and it would be a real mess, and slippery and just really unpleasant to move through. Sort of like the PB when SS is posting lots.
Following on all of their success with the federal budget, I understand that Congressional Republicans are planning to amend the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

bilmore 03-10-2005 03:46 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Yes - I see a few problems - but I just want to get rid of the loud Harleys. I love the idea, in theory, of a noise tax.
I would like to heavily tax rap groups, as they annoy me.

And butterless popcorn. We should tax the hell out of that.

If these effin' people want to engage in shit that doesn't please me, make 'em pay, I say! I have rights, too!

Hank Chinaski 03-10-2005 03:46 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Following on all of their success with the federal budget, I understand that Congressional Republicans are planning to amend the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
You mean the "If we all pray hard enough this should work..." rule. Yet I've read that one.

bilmore 03-10-2005 03:50 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Following on all of their success with the federal budget, I understand that Congressional Republicans are planning to amend the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
They took that lesson from Kerry, who tried to overturn the First Law with his "tax the rich" philosophy.

ltl/fb 03-10-2005 03:51 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
In addition, a lot of other products produce pollution and have no tax on them.
NO FUCKING WAY. You gotta be shitting me on this.

Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Sort of but not really. It does not take into account how efficiently the gas is used. Different engines put out a different amount of exhaust per gallon.
Yes, but the gas tax is not a bad estimator and is a hell of a lot cheaper to administer than having individual pollution-measuring doohickies on everyone's exhaust pipes, and making sure that people actually keep those on there. Having things super-exact is administratively super-expensive.

Transaction costs, bucko. You have to address transaction costs in your bright ideas. This isn't econ class where we get to start out saying "assuming no transaction costs."

Hank Chinaski 03-10-2005 03:55 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
NO FUCKING WAY. You gotta be shitting me on this.
you were the one saying we should tax noise pollution right?

ltl/fb 03-10-2005 03:56 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
you were the one saying we should tax noise pollution right?
No, I wasn't. I believe that was your friend Spankme.

sgtclub 03-10-2005 03:59 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
No, I wasn't. I believe that was your friend Spankme.
God damn it, not another fucking tax discussion . . . .

ltl/fb 03-10-2005 04:14 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
God damn it, not another fucking tax discussion . . . .
While I realize it would be financially advantageous to you personally, I don't advocate a tax on fucking to replace the current income tax system.

Shape Shifter 03-10-2005 04:14 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Transaction costs, bucko. You have to address transaction costs in your bright ideas. This isn't econ class where we get to start out saying "assuming no transaction costs."
And with that, all transactional lawyers breathe a sigh of relief.

notcasesensitive 03-10-2005 04:18 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
And with that, all transactional lawyers breathe a sigh of relief.
I'm a walking fucking transaction cost. But not a walking, fucking transaction cost, so don't bother calling me (again!) when you're drunk at 4:00 a.m., SS.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 03-10-2005 04:33 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Really? I can't believe that. There just aren't that many hybrids on the road, even in the crunchy area I live, and while they get better mileage, they still burn gas.
Studies have shown clearly that the CAFE standards, which raise average gas mileage, have had almost no effect on gasoline consumption. People drive by the total cost of driving--that is, because they need to spend less on fuel, they drive more. So hybrid drivers, predictably, will simply drive more than they otherwise would.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 03-10-2005 04:34 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
Really, that's why there's a CA bill being proposed to tax based on miles driven.
guess it's been covered, but there are pollution costs and road depreciation costs associated with driving--it's approrpiate to charge for both, if the transaction costs don't make doing so prohibitive.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 03-10-2005 04:34 PM

Damn HYbrids!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
I will go along with that as long as we tax those stupid Harleys 10 dollars a mile for all the noize they make.
Why not just enforce the noise laws?

Seriously, why aren't they enforced? Cops don't have the nads to mess with the Angels?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:29 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com