Penske_Account |
08-16-2005 07:27 PM |
Quote:
Originally posted by baltassoc
No doubt some of the things would still get purchased, but there is an inefficiency introduced through a gift-giving process. Items get purchased that the recipient doesn't realy need. Maybe they take them back, maybe they don't. Meanwhile, the things that are actually needed are actually purchased.
Even at a 10 - 20 percent boost, it's enough to mean the difference between growth and stagnation.
[Fuck. I can't believe I'm arguing with you over this. You are such a fucking troll.]
|
Why is this a troll topic? Its a real and honest musing. Obviously there is a benefit to commerce that is measurable and (I think) there is a productiviity drag effect. My gut tells me the former outweighs the latter but not by design, however I was curious as to what others thought. You used industries you work for as examples. For clients of mine, I would bet the drag substantially outweighs any benefit (actually I doubt there is any benefit). Further, I would say in my practice for my firm, its probably an overall loss. Year end deals crammed into December may make for a bigger month, but those deals, for my firm, are not driven by Christmas, and would happen anyway. Also, in what is probably an aberation, KNOCK ON WOOD, I have not had a substantial year end deal in years and yet I do lots of deals and regularly bill in excess of 2500, but usually adjust my workload by design with a dash of luck to finish anything big by the first week of Dec.
Anyway, if you think its a troll thing, no need to respond to any of the above.
|