LawTalkers - A sad, constant bid for attention

Originally posted by dtb
So true, so true. Low rise pants on chicks who are not fit are a BAD IDEA. On skinny chicks who are not fit, their soft bits hang over the waistband. It's not a good look.

What I find even more weird in that photo is how much taller she is than Tom. She looks like a giant compared to him, and I think she's 5'9". Nicole Kidman is tall (I think she's 5'11"), but I guess I never saw a picture of them standing right next to each other.

They list her height at 5'9" so even if she's wearing 4" heels, he's clearly lying about the 5'8" thing.

ThurgreedMarshall

10-02-2006 03:14 PM

Hypothetical question

Quote:

Originally posted by patentparanyc
that is a lotta coin for that type of work. oof.

Here is a tip, because you do this all the time:

The post I am quoting is pointless. It doesn't say anything or add to the conversation in any way. You are simply agreeing with what he said in the most uncreative way imaginable. It is a completely worthless waste of space type post and whenever you do it, it looks like you're just desperate for attention or want to be involved any way you can.

If you find that you want to reply with something like, "Yeah, the sky really is blue today," stop, think to yourself: "Am I just restating the obvious?" and don't post.

TM

ThurgreedMarshall

10-02-2006 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
http://www.bustedtees.com/bt/images/...atured-926.jpg

Are you starting early? We haven't even whipped your #1 starter yet.

TM

greatwhitenorthchick

10-02-2006 03:20 PM

Kate Bosworth

Quote:

Originally posted by NotFromHere
Better pic of Kate's ribcage.

"I was astonished by the ribs protruding from her dress. She wore designer clothing, but it'd be impossible for her to cover up her skinniness," an eyewitness says of the 5'7" Kate, 23, whose estimated weight is just 115 pounds.

She weighs a lot less than 115. I'd say about 100-105.

ltl/fb

10-02-2006 03:20 PM

Hypothetical question

Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Here is a tip, because you do this all the time:

The post I am quoting is pointless. It doesn't say anything or add to the conversation in any way. You are simply agreeing with what he said in the most uncreative way imaginable. It is a completely worthless waste of space type post and whenever you do it, it looks like you're just desperate for attention or want to be involved any way you can.

If you find that you want to reply with something like, "Yeah, the sky really is blue today," stop, think to yourself: "Am I just restating the obvious?" and don't post.

TM

The sky is very, very blue. And cloudless. At least, the tiny little part of it I can see is.

ThurgreedMarshall

10-02-2006 03:20 PM

Hypothetical question

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
The sky is very, very blue. And cloudless. At least, the tiny little part of it I can see is.

Good one.

TM

ltl/fb

10-02-2006 03:22 PM

Kate Bosworth

Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
She weighs a lot less than 115. I'd say about 100-105.

Really? Jesus.

Not Bob

10-02-2006 03:25 PM

Kate Bosworth

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Really? Jesus.

Here is a tip, because you do this all the time:

The post I am quoting is pointless. It doesn't say anything or add to the conversation in any way. You are simply agreeing with what she said in the most uncreative way imaginable. It is a completely worthless waste of space type post and whenever you do it, it looks like you're just desperate for attention or want to be involved any way you can.

If you find that you want to reply with something like, "Yeah, the sky really is blue today," stop, think to yourself: "Am I just restating the obvious?" and don't post.

(I've always wanted to do the whole "cut and paste someone else's post to make a funny" post -- yay!)

Hank Chinaski

10-02-2006 03:26 PM

Kate Bosworth

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Really? Jesus.

when you have people to run your errands, like say take the pet to the vet, then you have less exposure to snacking temptations.

greatwhitenorthchick

10-02-2006 03:28 PM

and another thing

I never watch heavyweight boxing because it's boring as hell, but if I watched it, I would not watch the upcoming fight between Monte Barrett and some Russian. The Russian outweighs Barrett by 100 pounds (!!) and is 7 feet to Barrett's 6'2" or something like that. How could this possibly be a good match? It's so fucking stupid.

ltl/fb

10-02-2006 03:29 PM

Kate Bosworth

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
when you have people to run your errands, like say take the pet to the vet, then you have less exposure to snacking temptations.

It's when I'm home during the day that I tend to eat constantly.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)

10-02-2006 03:37 PM

and another thing

Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
The Russian outweighs Barrett by 100 pounds (!!) and is 7 feet to Barrett's 6'2" or something like that. How could this possibly be a good match? It's so fucking stupid.

People said that Drago would kill Rocky. That was a good match.

ThurgreedMarshall

10-02-2006 03:38 PM

Kate Bosworth

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
It's when I'm home during the day that I tend to eat constantly.

So, when was the last time you left the house? You can't trick us with that "the sky is blue today" bit.

TM

patentparanyc

10-02-2006 03:44 PM

Hypothetical question

Quote:

I know you don't think I "add value" but today is day of atonement so maybe I should/will consider atoning.