LawTalkers - More pie

Originally posted by patentparanyc
AND AND that he subjected me to some strict standard stringent set of parameters like model like and all that and gorgeous hottie standards. I implied I was a pretty girl that gets a lot of attention. I do. Attys here buy me coffee, give me sbux cards, take me out to lunch. I get hit on on the train, in GC in sbux which was high comedy here everywhere. doesn't mean I'm a smokin hottie AT ALL.

So, let me get this straight: he said you're not pretty, but because his evaluations aren't accurate, you actually are pretty.

He said I'm not pretty, but I am not, because his evaluations are accurate.

You know, patentpara, I have never said anything your looks, on the board or off. I don't think any of it is funny. I have made fun of your posts, but never joked about TM's evaluation of you. In fact, I wanted to warn you off the whole experience, but you hadn't generated enough goodwill to motivate me to do so.

I have also never commented on the board about my own looks. So it mystifies me as to why you think (1) it's funny to knock anyone's looks, (2) whether it could constitutes an insult coming from someone who has never lain eyes on me, and (3) that I would care about your opinion.

patentparanyc

09-08-2006 02:32 PM

Court related things

Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
So, let me get this straight: he said you're not pretty, but because his evaluations aren't accurate, you actually are pretty.

He said I'm not pretty, but I am not, because his evaluatinos are accurate.

You know, patentpara, I have never said anything your looks on the board. I have made fun of your posts, but never joked about TM's evaluation of you. In fact, I wanted to warn you off the whole experience, but you hadn't generated enough goodwill to motivate me to do so.

I have also never commented on the board about my own looks. So it mystifies me as to why you think (1) it's funny to knock anyone's looks, (2) whether it could constitutes an insult coming from someone who has never lain eyes on the subject, and (3) that I would care about your opinion.

He never said you weren't pretty. But a third party did. I never apologized to him for that one, I felt it was fair game since he lied about being attractive. That third party got it on reference from someone else. so you take that for w it is worth babe.

notcasesensitive

09-08-2006 02:32 PM

Court related things

Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
This is not cheering me up. I just euthanized my cat, I have the worst cold ever (for the 6th time this year), I have had to spend every day this week "managing expectations" (as in saying "sorry, that's not going to be ready"), self-evaluations are due soon (great timing), and ...

I'm not even supposed to BE here today!!!

I'm sorry to hear about your cat. I'd tell you the story about the cute thing that my cat did last night, but I'm not sure that will help. So the best I can do is piling on the village idiot. I suck.

robustpuppy

09-08-2006 02:33 PM

Court related things

Quote:

Originally posted by patentparanyc
He never said you weren't pretty. But a third party did. I never apologized to him for that one, I felt it was fair game since he lied about being attractive. That third party got it on reference from someone else. so you take that for w it is worth babe.

Oh believe me, I do take it for what it's worth.

Let me try to make this point more clear: I don't care what you heard about my looks from anyone. So your response right now is utterly irrelevant to my post. Yet, funny enough, it proves my point.

You are the twittiest twit ever to twitter.

Hank Chinaski

09-08-2006 02:33 PM

Court related things

Quote:

Originally posted by dtb
Unless she's not walking yet, this is a LIE!!

ETA: or unless you're on a bicycle. or a car.

actually the first wife would be better off rolling, don't know about the kid.

http://www.completecollections.co.uk...log/rhRD16.jpg

Penske_Account

09-08-2006 02:34 PM

Court related things

Quote:

Originally posted by dtb
I think (but maybe this is just me) that you would find that tolerance-for-bullshit (part of any job) would decline in direct proportion with your need for the money.

Maybe that's not true if you have a job that you absolutely love (I'm thinking Bill Gates or movie stars...), but anything related to the law? Meh.

This is outable, so be discreete,,,,,

I was a party at the house of one of the members of Gates' old MS posse, now retired. Another MS retiree and I are talking to the host. The topic was community volunteer activities...sitting on boards......arts.....city committees to study this or that.....etc....etc...et al. Anyhoo, one retiree references a third party not present in the context of, would said third party be interested in sitting on a certain board of a charitable org. Host says "maybe, although he might have time constraints, I heard he got a job" First guy says, "job!?!? what's wrong with him??" and looks at me and says "oh, sorry".

I died a little inside at that moment.

Sidd Finch

09-08-2006 02:34 PM

Court related things

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I agree with you, but my wife would go nuts. So would I. Go figure. Diff'rent strokes, and all that.

2. I'd take bnb's lifestyle for a week, but longer than that and I'd lose my mind.

Though the Siddette has no need of being "woken up." My day starts with the 5-o'clock Howling.

patentparanyc

09-08-2006 02:35 PM

Court related things

Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Oh believe me, I do take it for what it's worth.

Fine then know this. someone out there thinks you ain't all that but it ain't TM.

Which blows your theory to bits. and should make you neurotic crazed to figure out who said that.

Penske_Account

09-08-2006 02:35 PM

Court related things

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
But the car still looks good, and that's important.

My wife's car: Wheaties, etc. permitted.
My car: No food. Water if you're dying.

Guess which car you'd rather ride in?

222222.

robustpuppy

09-08-2006 02:36 PM

Court related things

Quote:

Originally posted by patentparanyc
Fine then know this. someone out there thinks you ain't all that but it ain't TM.

Which blows your theory to bits. and should make you neurotic crazed to figure out who said that.

It's true, I just won't rest.

Penske_Account

09-08-2006 02:36 PM

Court related things

Quote:

Originally posted by dtb
Unless she's not walking yet, this is a LIE!!

mmmmm3587 was your sock, yes?

ltl/fb

09-08-2006 02:37 PM

Court related things

Quote:

Originally posted by patentparanyc
flourescent light bulbs

Psst, these have carbs.

Shape Shifter

09-08-2006 02:38 PM

Court related things

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
This is outable, so be discreete,,,,,

I was a party at the house of one of the members of Gates' old MS posse, now retired. Another MS retiree and I are talking to the host. The topic was community volunteer activities...sitting on boards......arts.....city committees to study this or that.....etc....etc...et al. Anyhoo, one retiree references a third party not present in the context of, would said third party be interested in sitting on a certain board of a charitable org. Host says "maybe, although he might have time constraints, I heard he got a job" First guy says, "job!?!? what's wrong with him??" and looks at me and says "oh, sorry".

I died a little inside at that moment.

I just shot a cell phone out of my ass.

patentparanyc

09-08-2006 02:38 PM

Court related things

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Psst, these have carbs.

Bwahhhahahaha
good for you fringey

Hank Chinaski

09-08-2006 02:38 PM

Court related things

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Psst, these have carbs.