![]() |
I'm Pleased
Quote:
Sebby says, "I'm a lover of liberty, a lifelong pro-Choice Catholic, and I'm sick of people like you saying drugs should be illegal but abortion should be state's rights". Who you talking about here Sebby? Because where I'm from, you are talking about the suburban crowd. Yeah, fuck all the minorities in the ghetto, but don't you dare throw a felony on my kid for buying the shit. Look around you man, your people are the problem. You can erect all the straw boogey-men you want, but at the end of the day its your compromises that were necessary to get to this perpetual cycle of social failure. Call me what you will, but I don't see no pink elephants in the mirror when I'm brushing my teeth. You are an impossibly convoluted caricature of a libertarian. |
Aussie Elections
Anyone care to speculate why the significance of Howard's landslide hasn't made louder news? Anyone care to speculate whether it would have been louder news if he lost?
|
proof you are a liability
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,135033,00.html
Ms. Heinz-Kerry's value to the ticket can be seen by the choice of appearances. They have her in Texas. There could be no clearer statement that she scares the guys running the campaign. |
Aussie Elections
Quote:
The American main stream media is, at heart, relentlessly conservative, but, at the same time, polite, and so they don't wish to crow about this rather impressive ratification of Bush's ideas by one of our more important allies? (What do I win?) |
Aussie Elections
Quote:
|
Aussie Elections
Quote:
Quote:
Aussies are pretty much just Texans with funny accents and wanderlust, though, so I wasn't really expecting much of a change. |
Aussie Elections
Quote:
|
Aussie Elections
Quote:
And is it all that much of a suprise that Howard's party won? I could swear that the Economist ran an article a few weeks ago about the fact that he was leading by a pretty good margin, and that his opponent was regared as an inexperienced lightweight. |
Aussie Elections
Quote:
Would there have been more news made -- absent the attack -- had the Spanish government stayed in office? Maybe. But not much, I don't think. Perhaps the same amount of attention on either side (opinion journals mostly -- maybe the Nation versus the National Review). I just don't think that most newspapers think that their readers care about it. A story on page A-8. |
Aussie Elections
Quote:
I saw something on the news that Australia's unemployment rate is at 2.8%, which is supposedly extraordinarily low on a historical basis for them. The nation supposedly also feels like things are good and getting better. |
Aussie Elections
Quote:
But mine was knowing satire. There are tons of pro-Kerry submissions in the news that surely don't meet this "National Enquirer" test of public utility you are offering. It's a valid theory until you examine how they treat both sides. Quote:
|
Aussie Elections
Quote:
I'd imagine that the reason relates to a combination of (1) the absence of an attack overshadowing the election, (2) the (slightly) increased difference in time, and (3) the continuation of the status quo is never as big of a story as change, and (4) some newsrooms didn't see the upside in trumpeting this as a validation of Bush's policies, so they left that task to News Corp. That said, bilmore's answer is more succinct and snappier, kinda like GWB's answer on abortion. So, let's go with that. ETA: Correction. Bilmore's was "knowing satire." Of course, forgive me. |
Aussie Elections
Quote:
|
Aussie Elections
Quote:
(Italy's voters chose a Kerry-clone. NYT front page. Germany's voters reject the Kerry-clone. Very small blurb. Chirac's bribery stories. Not so much. Ink problem in Afghanistan. Big news. ) |
I'm Pleased
Quote:
"Play ethnicky jazz to parade your snazz on your five grand stereo, bragging that you know how the niggesr feel cold and the Sun's got so much soul..." Stop trying to call me a classist/racist/anti-urbanist. My post had no hint of any of that. At least when I crash and burn, I admit it, instead of trying to morph the subject fifty times. Admit it, man - you're a conservative - you want people to adhere to certain morals, but you just can't stomach saying it because that forces you to give up all intellectual credibility in the argument. And get rid of your hard on for for arguments about the ghetto. Its sounds contrived from an obviously whitebread Catholic kid from the better side of the tracks. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com