![]() |
Discuss
Quote:
|
Well you asked for a discussion
Quote:
|
Discuss
Quote:
|
Well you asked for a discussion
Quote:
|
Discuss
Quote:
That's unacceptable, of course, and Israel needs to do something, and I don't pretend to know what the optimal solution is. I do see, though, that the slogging is much tougher than Israel anticipated, and I suspect that another long term war and occuption, while maybe necessary here, is not at all what Israel had in mind. Similar deal with Iraq. Declaring that organizations must be "destroyed" led us to the shit that we're in now in Iraq, and it leads us to the rationale where we have to invade and indefinitely occupy every potential terrorist threat on the planet. |
Discuss
Quote:
|
Discuss
Quote:
Hezbollah as a military entity must be destroyed. Should Israel do this through a house-to-house war? No. The cost would be too high. And I don't think destroying Hezbollah as a military entity means killing every last soldier or blowing up every last tunnel (not that I wouldn't applaud that occurrence.) But I do not see this as solely an Israeli problem or obligation. Security council resolution and all that. Hamas is a terror organization. Hezbollah is an army. There is a very important difference. |
Discuss
Quote:
ETA: duh. You read it already. |
Discuss
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Discuss
Quote:
If we're really going to stop the genocide and the terrorism, then we have to be prepared to go all the way. Applying band-aids to those wounds we find it politically expedient to treat is like trying to stop the heroin trade one street dealer at a time. |
Discuss
Quote:
|
Discuss
Quote:
You know, somewhere in between nuking Belfast, and surrendering the entire island. |
Discuss
Quote:
|
Discuss
Quote:
|
Discuss
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:13 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com