PS
 

No, you're confusing the two. The Piece Prize goes to Charlize.

The October Surprise
 

If that was your point, you should have said so.

I have never met Kerry, but I know people who have (including one reasonably good friend (and potential ambassador)) who sincerely like the man and want him to be President.

Are you checking at the Kerry rallies or the Bush rallies?

S_A_M

I'm Pleased
 

Yup.

As I think I've said before, those who are in favor of allowing abortion, but with restrictions, believe that abortion should be available in cases of (1) rape (2) incest and (3) them.

The October Surprise
 

This guy checked both, repeatedly.

Says, Bushies are actively and affirmatively FOR Bush.

Kerryites are actively and affirmatively for . . . . um . . . . getting rid of Bush.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2004Oct11.html

I'm Pleased
 

Cool. I've always been an atheist, because I figured that, to be religious, you'd have to believe in a god and all that, and follow some religion's rules and teachings. So, it's all pretty much optional? This is sounding easier.

Flip-flop Flip-flop Flip-flop Flip-flop
 

The steadfast, unwavering leadership of GWB will put the Iranians in their place and show them the stick, NOT the carrot, to make them come around. Appeasement of commies and dictators is solely the province of Clintonite and Kerrian pussies.

... until after the election, that is.

If you don't have anything nice to say ...
 

So with all these conservatives so wildly for Bush, could you explain to me again why you're so enthusiastically backing a man who has added 800,000 government sector jobs over the last four years, moved us back into deficit spending, and failed to fund his most significant legislative initiative? Why, Bilmore, Why?

And, moreover, why doesn't Bush choose then to run on his record and policies, instead of just repeating, over and over, Iraq/Flip Flop; Iraq/ Flip Flop?

Why, Bilmore, Why?

PSS
 

You just like him for his new anti-Kerry song. Lyrics:

"Stand"

I don't need John Kerry to wipe my ass, don't need Ted Kennedy to spill my glass, Al Not So Sharpton is a horses ass, redistribution is a fkn laugh.

Ch-I don't need nobody to hold my hand, don't need nobody, I can stand. Make it on my own in a Rock-n-Roll band, kiss my American ass I'm a Republican.

V2-ya say you're friends with Michael Moore. Then you are friends with pimps & whores, The 2nd Amendment aint about no sport, no right to self defense in a Kerry court.

Ch- Brdg-You don't think I'm taxed enuf, well I'm ready to call your bluff. Pimps & whores & welfare brats, too much gvt way too fat.

http://www.exquisitedeadguy.50megs.com/gonzo.gif

I'm Pleased
 

The fastest way to shut up a pro-lifer is to ask him or her if he/she is willing to pay the cost attendant to raising the child through college. I've never seen so much sudden and debilitating larengitis hit the assembeled members of a group all at once.

My favorite pro-lifer position is "Well, its all about personal responsibility." This nifty comeback begs the question, "Do you have a relative on medicare assistance of some sort?" (nearly all of them do) "Well then why don't you take personal responsibility for your family instead of leaving it to the govt? Why would you be so irresponsible so as not to plan for your relatives? And why weren't you responsbile enough to save for retirment instead of relying on social security, which my generation will have to pay for?"

These shrill people wouldn't know responsibility if straddled them and pissed in their eyes. They just get off on feeling morally superior.

I'm Pleased
 

Board Motto.

PSS
 

I liked him better when he picked the pussy fur with a stroke of his hand, when he pretended like his face was a Maserati. More sublety, more nuance.

eta: More fun with bow hunting here: http://www.wftv.com/news/3801807/detail.html

I'm Pleased
 

I prefer SD's "straddle them and piss in their eyes" as a board motto.

I'm Pleased
 

The fastest way to shut up an idiot that throws this simple line out is (1) remind them there are hundreds of thousands of parents in this country looking to adopt, (2) my taxes already pay for welfare for other's people's mothers and public education for other's people's kids, and (3) since when is going to college be an inalienable right?

PSS
 

When I read articles like this, I really question natural selection.

"After taking a bike ride to cool down, he took a crossbow from the trunk of his car and shot a phonebook "so he could impress his mother with the power of the cross bow," according to a report by Martin County sheriff's officials. He said when she wasn't impressed, he shot her in the chest, the report said."

Bet she was impressed then.

Bush, and fiscal "credibility."
 

From today's WaPo, demonstrating GOP congressional fiscal discipline:

• THE CORPORATE tax bill that Congress has sent to the White House rewards just about every special interest that retains a lobbyist in Washington. Makers of sonar fish finders stand to gain, as do importers of Chinese ceiling fans, dog-track operators who cater to foreign gamblers, and Native Alaskan whaling captains.
  
  
  ***
  
  A few years ago, congressional Republicans claimed to stand for free-market principles -- for the idea that government should get out of the way and allow the economy to reward the innovators and entrepreneurs who fuel progress. But power has corrupted the party. Now that they are the incumbents, they skew the economic playing field so as to reward their friends and fill their campaign treasuries.
  
  The bill that Congress has produced is monstrous in just about every way. Designed to close a $5 billion-a-year export subsidy that violated international trade law, it ended by spraying out $140 billion in business breaks over 10 years. It absurdly rewards tobacco farmers, and absentee tobacco landlords, without imposing even the minimal regulation on tobacco that the nation's biggest cigarette maker had agreed to. In Friday's debate, President Bush said he would discipline Congress in order to reduce the budget deficit. If Mr. Bush cannot bring himself to veto this terrible bill, it will be hard to take him seriously.

OK, GOPers. Your candidate, somewhat improbably, ridicules the credibility of his opponent on fiscal matters while remaining curiously silent on the double digit increases in non-defense-related spending on his watch, and his apparent loss of his veto pen, lying somewhere in uncleared brush in Crawford.

Anyone think he'll veto this? Slave, you still think he'll find his pen sometime after Election Day?