LawTalkers - The babyjesuschristsuperstar on Board: filling the moral void of Clinton’s legacy

Originally posted by Spanky
For some reason those books are not made public. I have a good friend that is pretty high up in the District Attorney Office in LA. He told me they broke up a gay prostitution ring in LA. The guy running the organization not only had complete computer records of the people who used their services, but had a detailed accounts of what their specific sexual requests were. The guy used modern client servicing software that included a detailed description of what the client did on his "trysts" so they would know how to service him the next time. He said the lists and the requests would blow you away.

However, my friend could not tell me who was in it or what they did.

If we posted these on the Sex Offender Registry, I think we would free up a lot of police time.

Spanky

01-03-2006 04:39 PM

Making my New Year Happy

Quote:

Originally posted by Captain
If we posted these on the Sex Offender Registry, I think we would free up a lot of police time.

Maybe I have been brainwashed by the PC crowd but I thought most sex offenders (outside the Catholic Church) were heterosexual. In addition, I also thought that most men that molested young boys did not like older men (something to do with the fact that the young boys were similar to women).

Is that not true?

taxwonk

01-03-2006 04:40 PM

Making my New Year Happy

Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Maybe I have been brainwashed by the PC crowd but I thought most sex offenders (outside the Catholic Church) were heterosexual. In addition, I also thought that most men that molested young boys did not like older men (something to do with the fact that the young boys were similar to women).

Is that not true?

Hank may prefer to answer this via PM. Word to the wise.

Sidd Finch

01-03-2006 04:43 PM

The so called "experts".

Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
I was watching the Chris Mathew Show, and of all the "experts" he polled (I think is was fifteen political commentators - all the big names) said they all thought that Hillary had the Dem nomination sowed up. The only person that many of them thought had even a glimmer of hope to beat her was George Allen of Virginia. One interesting point they made was that Hillary will raise sixty million for her Senate race and will use only twenty for the race, and will be able to use the other forty for her presidential run.

How many experts picked Bill Clinton as the next president in January 1990?

Not to suggest that there are significant similarities between the political situation of that time and today, just to note that a whole lot can happen in a couple of years. (For example, Hillary may lose my vote if she succeeds in keeping the really good first-person shooter games off the shelves.)

Spanky

01-03-2006 04:47 PM

The so called "experts".

Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
How many experts picked Bill Clinton as the next president in January 1990?

Not to suggest that there are significant similarities between the political situation of that time and today, just to note that a whole lot can happen in a couple of years. (For example, Hillary may lose my vote if she succeeds in keeping the really good first-person shooter games off the shelves.)

Yes but everyone predicted that it would be Bush Gore in 2000. In 92 Bush I was unbeatable until the economy tanked. It really comes down to money, and forty million is a lot of money. And McCain has show he can raise a lot of money across the country. I think Hillary will be tough to beat. However, I think McCain will be even tougher. I could be wrong, but he seems almost unbeatable to me.

Captain

01-03-2006 04:51 PM

Making my New Year Happy

Quote:

I was just looking for a place to post it.

We could post it on lawtalkers.com, too, and it would serve the same funciton. And I'd post the Madams (sirs?) little black books without regard to their sexual preference.

Or have I just violated to the constitution's right to a trial before punishment or something?

sebastian_dangerfield

01-03-2006 04:56 PM

The so called "experts".

Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Yes but everyone predicted that it would be Bush Gore in 2000. In 92 Bush I was unbeatable until the economy tanked. It really comes down to money, and forty million is a lot of money. And McCain has show he can raise a lot of money across the country. I think Hillary will be tough to beat. However, I think McCain will be even tougher. I could be wrong, but he seems almost unbeatable to me.

I couldn't disagree more. I think Hillary is a disaster for the Dems. She's the only Dem who could possibly galvanize Rove's coalition a third time.

Its all about money if you've got relatively evenly polling candidates. Hillary comes to the table with half the country hating her.

Secret_Agent_Man

01-03-2006 05:25 PM

Making my New Year Happy

Quote:

Most sex offenders, inside and outside the Catholic Church, are heterosexual. (Although pedophiles don't really fit into the textbook definitions of homo- or hetero-sexuality.)

While there are notorious cases of same-sex pedophiles/serial killers, the incidence of homosexual pedophilia is lower than that of adult women molesting young boys, which is, of course, dwarfed by the incidence of men molesting young girls.

S_A_M

Diane_Keaton

01-03-2006 05:36 PM

The so called "experts".

Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Hillary comes to the table with half the country hating her.

For the wrong reasons, as I've posted on here before. At least 50% of the criticism of her has been unsupported hysteria. (Cue Penske socks.)

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)

01-03-2006 05:48 PM

The so called "experts".

Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
I couldn't disagree more. I think Hillary is a disaster for the Dems. She's the only Dem who could possibly galvanize Rove's coalition a third time.

That doesn't mean she won't get the nomination, however foolhardy a choice that would be.

sebastian_dangerfield

01-03-2006 05:51 PM

The so called "experts".

Quote:

Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
For the wrong reasons, as I've posted on here before. At least 50% of the criticism of her has been unsupported hysteria. (Cue Penske socks.)

She's a closet tax and spender. Don't believe the hype - she's no moderate like her husband. Why do you think he had to shut her up and take that advisor position away from her in his first term. She's a classic old school lefty Democrat.

Diane_Keaton

01-03-2006 06:15 PM

The so called "experts".

Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
She's a closet tax and spender. Don't believe the hype - she's no moderate like her husband. Why do you think he had to shut her up and take that advisor position away from her in his first term. She's a classic old school lefty Democrat.

Long before anyone knew what her politics were, there was a rabid anti-Hilary movement purportedly based on her politics, which is bullshit. And the hysteria about how she was "running the White House" (yeah, right) and people bitching about how they hadn't elected her, but rather, her husband. This woman's public perception was doomed from the get-go because she was an employed lawyer, didn't choose "teaching wounded, homeless puppies how to read" as her First-Lady cause, had cankles, and wore pants-suits. Most anti-Hillies will say its her politics but it's really something else. I'm just sayin.

Shape Shifter

01-03-2006 06:16 PM

The so called "experts".

Quote:

Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
Long before anyone knew what her politics were, there was a rabid anti-Hilary movement purportedly based on her politics, which is bullshit. And the hysteria about how she was "running the White House" (yeah, right) and people bitching about how they hadn't elected her, but rather, her husband. This woman's public perception was doomed from the get-go because she was an employed lawyer, didn't choose "teaching wounded, homeless puppies how to read" as her First-Lady cause, had cankles, and wore pants-suits. Most anti-Hillies will say its her politics but it's really something else. I'm just sayin.

You're just testing his self-control, aren't you?

Sidd Finch

01-03-2006 06:20 PM

The so called "experts".

Quote:

Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
For the wrong reasons, as I've posted on here before. At least 50% of the criticism of her has been unsupported hysteria. (Cue Penske socks.)

I agree with you, but (for purposes of the instant discussion) so what? Sebby's point still holds -- people will pour money into beating her because of the "bitch" (i.e., successful woman who makes them feel inadequate) factor. Hell, I bet Penske is already writing checks.

Diane_Keaton

01-03-2006 06:22 PM

The so called "experts".

Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
You're just testing his self-control, aren't you?

No. But I oughtta test his political barometer, since he's acting quite the Lefty today, over on that certain other board. He's pro-criminal. AND he's against federal pound-me-in-the-ass prisons.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:39 PM.

Page 168 of 334

168

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page