![]() |
Penske's first wife's sister in the news
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/Con...l=968350060724
http://www.kcci.com/2006/0906/9796529_240X180.jpg |
Thanks Patriots
Quote:
|
A Modest Proposal
Celtic have drawn Manchester United in the Champion's League and will face each other tomorrow in their first competitive match ever. They have played many friendly / exhibition matches in the past, but this time it means something.
Manchester United are heavy favorites. I think the odds were 33-1 the last time I looked. But miracles can happen. So I propose the following: I will wager up to three months of board support that Celtic will get a result (as defined below). What this means is that if Celtic lose, I will pay one month of board support (up to a total of three months) for each person (up to a total of 3) who accepts my wager. If Celtic draw, you pay. If Celtic win, you pay. Here is the catch: the game will be carried live tomorrow at 2:30 PM on ESPN2. You have to watch the game. I don't care if you Tivo it or tape it or whatever and watch it later. But in order to collect you will have to demonstrate to me that you watched the game by showing some non-googleable knowledge of the match -- this can be done by either volunteering some piece of information that proves you watched it or answering a question or two that convinces me you saw it. Any questions? Any takers? Note: this offer is not open to minors or residents of the Land of Fu. |
A Modest Proposal
Quote:
|
A Modest Proposal
Quote:
|
Thanks Patriots
Quote:
|
A Modest Proposal
Quote:
http://www.paddypower.com/bet?action=go_soccer_level1 They play in different leagues and Man U spends more on two or three players in a year than we spend on our whole team. ETA: you can get better odds on Werder Bremen to beat Chelsea. And we all know what crap Werder Bremen is. |
Saddam Hussein Is Canadian
Or at least a Kids in the Hall fan:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/....ap/index.html |
Thanks Patriots
Quote:
|
Thanks Patriots
Quote:
Quote:
Whoever picked up for him after he left (his son, I think), didn't have the same flair and hasn't been showing up, which is just inexcusable. Anyway, the appropriate analogy isn't Fireman Eddie:Cowbell Ali. It is Fireman Eddie:Freddie Sez. Now go get your spoon and pot. TM |
Frankie Andreu: I love EPO
|
Thanks Patriots
Quote:
I believe that part of what makes the NFL so successful is the PARITY.* And one of the reasons why they can have that PARITY** is because teams can cut players and void their contracts. Teams often sign players to long contracts who have huge potential, giving them little guaranteed money. There is very little risk for the team, since if they perform to their potential, you've most likely got them locked in to a bargain, long-term contract. If they perform below potential, but are still workable players, you tell them to restructure. If they get injured or perform below what you can replace them with at a discount, you simply cut them. If that player exceeds expectations, he is expected to honor the contract. Please explain to me how this makes sense for anyone but the owners. It's great for teams, because they have minimal risk. But it's a disaster for a great deal of players who come into the league, get injured and are thrown away. Demanding insurance is a red herring because it's simply a matter of assigning the cost of insurance. Either you ask for more money and do it yourself or it comes out of your salary and the team does it for you. True value for the players would be giving them a better bargaining position w/r/t their contracts. And the NFL doesn't want that. TM *Damn it. Damn it. Damn it. **Did I say "Damn it" already? |
Thanks Patriots
Quote:
eta: Anyhoo, Burger's point is that (from an economic perspective) the players are going to demand the same share of overall revenue, whether contracts are guaranteed or not. TM's point is that NFL players incur a lot of risk that players in other sports do not. You're both right. If contracts in the NFL were guaranteed, you'd have players who cannot perform because of injury collecting money. So everyone would make a little less. The interesting question, IMHO, is whether NFL players prefer to roll the dice and accept larger, riskier contracts, or whether the lack of guaranteed contracts is something of a historical accident that evolved into a norm. |
Celebrity Sighting
Quote:
http://i68.photobucket.com/albums/i3...-j-bullock.jpg By the way, Cyndi still looks pretty good. Then: http://cyndi.com/items/2910.jpg Now: http://girlsnewsdaily.com/LydiaCornellPhoto033005.JPG TM |
Thanks Patriots
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:25 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com