![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I hope you are taking notes, Burger. *The baby, not the lawyer. |
Quote:
Damn, I hate hospitals. |
Breastfeeding stuff
I don't have much to add (since I never pumped), except to echo what others have already said about breastfeeding being difficult for almost everyone, and doable for almost everyone (I did have one friend with "insufficient glandular tissue" who found out her baby was crying all the time because he was hungry).
With Magnus (and I've probably posted about this before here), he acted like I was trying to kill him and refused to latch on for his first week. I had to pump and feed him with a syringe. He finally did latch on, but for another few weeks only forcibly (I had to use the football hold with my hand on the back of his head to keep him on). Breastfeeding was only easy after about three months, but then we kept it up until 16 months (gradually eliminating feedings starting at a year--I would plan on not going cold turkey if I were you). With Thor, it's been much much easier from the get-go. His latch isn't perfect (I have a really fast flow on one side, so he tries to pull back so it comes out slower), and now he's getting to that distractable age that results in my nipples being stretched in uncomfortable ways as he tries to look around while still attached, but overall it's been much easier (except for yeast and reflux issues, but those are whole other stories). Part of the reason I think it's been so different is because of very different birth experiences, which I've also posted about here. For us, shorter labor + really short pushing stage + no epidural = happy baby who nurses and sleeps well. As for the pushy nurses, I may be experiencing a geographic difference, because I never had them ask to give either of my kids anything. But then the babies basically never left my room (they're both uncirc'ed), and there weren't any complications that required separation. Do you have a birth plan? That might help. Feel free to PM me with any other questions. tm |
Quote:
That it happened to me probably does nothing to alleviate the guilt/stupidity/whatever. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
ml |
Quote:
I don't think I could do that--especially with a first child--even if I knew there was an extremely high likelihood that everything would go fine. I'd want to have emergency equipment on hand, just in case. Maybe with a second child, where I know what to expect with a birth. I think that at my age, though, a hypothetical second child would be a higher risk pregnancy (assuming at least a year or two between kids, and assuming the first kid isn't any time soon, and assuming no twins (that predisposition passes down the mother's side, right?)). The birthing center seems like a nice compromise, though. NOTE: RT is not pregnant and has no plans on being pregnant any time soon. |
Quote:
tm |
Quote:
From subsequent posts, it sounds like this policy is somehow connected to C-section births (which, as it happens, didn't happen with us). With vaginal births, I don't see how this kinda time element would come into play. Am I surmising this correctly, or is there something else I'm missing. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
tm |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Frankly, I think the "let's give the baby a bath" pressure comes from the fact that the nurses find it easier to do all at once. Once that shit dries, it's harder to wipe off with just water and mild soap. Why should nurses be any less lazy than any other American worker? They want to finish up and get back to their dirty nurses' chat boards on company time. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:55 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com