LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Fashion Board--Penske . . . forever! (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=742)

taxwonk 08-23-2006 02:56 PM

Doomed to spinsterhood
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Joy. They're now actively encouraging men not to marry me:
Hmmm. So women who enter the world of working men and do well, tend to start acting like...men?









Yes, I'm being sexist here. I'm doing it tongue in cheek.

ThurgreedMarshall 08-23-2006 02:56 PM

GRR
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
my last home had a JW family living at the end of the block. they would have meetings where bunches of them came over, I think carrying a red book. I never did get to know them. it's not like you can invite them over for drinks.
Why not?

TM

Oliver_Wendell_Ramone 08-23-2006 02:58 PM

Thanks
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
It has, however, become his primary posting mode.

I guess you should have followed the winery chick after all, Ollie.
You got me. Jealousy. If only I was a struggling solo with a bad heart, instead of running Hood to Coast while trying to figure out how to spend my next distribution. Sighhhhhhh.

robustpuppy 08-23-2006 03:00 PM

Grammar question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
He enters

They enter

The verb follows the subject, not the object.
No. His proposed sentence is in the subjunctive mood. "We write to request that the client enter..."

It's unclear whether the second "stipulate" is to be done by "your client" or by "we" (as fringey suggested). Either way, it's "stipulate."

SlaveNoMore 08-23-2006 03:01 PM

Grammar question
 
Quote:

Penske_Account
2. I once had a paralegal who argued an obscure rule of grammar with me. We discussed it and I dismissed his PoV. A few weeks later he sent me a memo documenting that he was correct.

Shortly thereafter he was fired.
How were his sushi recommendations?

Shape Shifter 08-23-2006 03:01 PM

GRR
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Why not?

TM
Because they were black.

taxwonk 08-23-2006 03:01 PM

Huh
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone
So this go 'round, Survivor will start off with 4 tribes divided by race.

Anybody think this is a good idea?
When did Thomas Sowell become a studio exec?

robustpuppy 08-23-2006 03:02 PM

Grammar question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
How were his sushi recommendations?
Oh! Don't eat the swordfish! Too much mercury.

Adder 08-23-2006 03:06 PM

Grammar question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by str8outavannuys
Which is correct:

a) We write to request that your client enters into certain stipulations . . . and stipulates to the following

or

b) We write to request that your client enter into certain stipulations . . . and stipulate to the following

Please no wise-ass comments -- looking for a serious answer here.
Well, b sounds better to me, but looking at it, the subject of "enter" is "client," suggesting that the singular "enters" and "stipulates" would be correct. But I am not the resident grammarian.

Hank Chinaski 08-23-2006 03:07 PM

Grammar question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Adder
But I am not the resident grammarian.
and right in the middle of typing this sentence what should have occured to you?

robustpuppy 08-23-2006 03:07 PM

Grammar question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Adder
Well, b sounds better to me, but looking at it, the subject of "enter" is "client," suggesting that the singular "enters" and "stipulates" would be correct. But I am not the resident grammarian.
If only you were.

dtb 08-23-2006 03:08 PM

Grammar question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
No. His proposed sentence is in the subjunctive mood. "We write to request that the client enter..."

It's unclear whether the second "stipulate" is to be done by "your client" or by "we" (as fringey suggested). Either way, it's "stipulate."
CoRRECT.

Isn't str8 Canadian? Doesn't he know French? English subjunctive is the infinitive, and is equivalent to romance-language subjunctive.

Shape Shifter 08-23-2006 03:10 PM

Grammar question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by dtb
CoRRECT.

Isn't str8 Canadian? Doesn't he know French? English subjunctive is the infinitive, and is equivalent to romance language subjunctive.
20 minutes.

bold_n_brazen 08-23-2006 03:13 PM

Grammar question
 
Quote:

Originally posted by dtb
CoRRECT.

Isn't str8 Canadian? Doesn't he know French? English subjunctive is the infinitive, and is equivalent to romance-language subjunctive.
This is fascinating, of course. (yawn)

But I am hard to entertain.

taxwonk 08-23-2006 03:13 PM

Thanks
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone
You got me. Jealousy. If only I was a struggling solo with a bad heart, instead of running Hood to Coast while trying to figure out how to spend my next distribution. Sighhhhhhh.
Yeah, but I've got good hair and legs, and I-bankers love me. They wear shirts with French cuffs, you know.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com