LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Fashion Board--Penske . . . forever! (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=742)

Tyrone Slothrop 08-16-2006 11:49 AM

K Race
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Thanks. I will try that. Is your firm hiring?
I said "get a life," not "get a job at a firm." Jaysus.

patentparanyc 08-16-2006 11:50 AM

K Race
 
Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Oooh, you little button-pusher you! You really know how to hurt my feelings, blurry as they are.
I'm a mean bitch deep down inside. sniff.

AoN to Bergdorf's at lunch to buy bras.

str8outavannuys 08-16-2006 12:02 PM

K Race
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I said "get a life," not "get a job at a firm." Jaysus.
Any litigators who are looking for a new home in LA, SF or NY, my firm is advertising a $15,000 referral bonus. Anyone interested (usual 50-50 split applies) please PM me.

Penske_Account 08-16-2006 12:05 PM

K Race
 
Quote:

Originally posted by str8outavannuys
Any litigators who are looking for a new home in LA, SF or NY, my firm is advertising a $15,000 referral bonus. Anyone interested (usual 50-50 split applies) please PM me.

How does your firm feel about ellipses?

LessinSF 08-16-2006 12:22 PM

K Race
 
Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
. . . (And I'm not talking only about animus directed toward me; my wonder actually preceded that period.)
I'm lost. Was it before or after your pregnancy (plus the three or so post-partum months when you likely didn't have a period)?

LessinCork

Pretty Little Flower 08-16-2006 12:22 PM

K Race
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Maybe, I am able to compartmentalise my relationships.

Other than my "relationship" with Paigow, I am not sure who you are referencing. I recall that I expressed my thoughts on this subject to you. Given that it's impossible for me, from my position, to verify what is she said/she said in some difference with people, I see no reason to take sides. That said, behavior that was out of bounds, in my opinion, I called out. To you and her.

I have no animus to you and don't think I have really participated in any antics towards you, notwithstanding that you and she have a thing. I also, as above, very explicitly told you things that I thought were bullshit about those antics, and communictated the same to her.

My cyberfriendship with Sunny is no different, notwithstanding that the two of them don't get along. I don't get involved, I don't need to, it is none of my business. Why should it be?
I try to get along to get along. I currently have only one actual enemy on the boards, and he/she knows what I am talking about all too well.

robustpuppy 08-16-2006 12:26 PM

K Race
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Maybe, I am able to compartmentalise my relationships.

Actually, that's not what quite I was talking about and the "antics" to which I was referring were not directed toward me. For the record, I don't think anyone should have, or should be expected to have, mutually exclusive friendships.

I perhaps inaccurately believe that you have participated in antics relating to accusations of admin abuse and that you have otherwise posted or encouraged postings that keep stirring up old grudges.

Adder 08-16-2006 12:28 PM

K Race
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Pretty Little Flower
I try to get along to get along. I currently have only one actual enemy on the boards, and he/she knows what I am talking about all too well.
Or so you think. I know I speak for other here when I say that we find you deeply annoying.

Yet oh so pretty!

Penske_Account 08-16-2006 12:28 PM

K Race
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Pretty Little Flower
I try to get along to get along. I currently have only one actual enemy on the boards, and he/she knows what I am talking about all too well.
Actually when I retired from socking, that hater poster may have retired too. Not that I know that, if you know what I mean and I hope that you do or at the very least that you can infer what I may be implying. Or not. sts.

Cheerio mate,

P

robustpuppy 08-16-2006 12:28 PM

K Race
 
Quote:

Originally posted by LessinSF
I'm lost. Was it before or after your pregnancy (plus the three or so post-partum months when you likely didn't have a period)?

LessinCork
Did your location have any role in your decision to post about periods?

LessinSF 08-16-2006 12:33 PM

K Race
 
Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Did your location have any role in your decision to post about periods?
No, and I'm not sure why it should unless they make cork tampons. Or does butter (Cork's historically most famous product) have something to do with menstruation? (One of Penske's socks is now on the clock).

Rather, it was your (admittedly only through a stretch of my own) ambiguous use of the word.

Penske_Account 08-16-2006 12:36 PM

K Race
 
Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy
Actually, that's not what quite I was talking about and the "antics" to which I was referring were not directed toward me. For the record, I don't think anyone should have, or should be expected to have, mutually exclusive friendships.
.
I am not sure I understand your use of "mutually exclusive friendships" Are you saying that you don't think people should be friends with individuals A and B, if A and B are at odds, i.e. each person should take absolute sides?

Or the opposite, i.e. it is possible to compartmentalise friendships.

Quote:

Originally posted by robustpuppy

I perhaps inaccurately believe that you have participated in antics relating to accusations of admin abuse and that you have otherwise posted or encouraged postings that keep stirring up old grudges.
I assume we are talking about Slave and Paigow. If that's true I am comfortable with my relationships with both Slave and Paigow and the intersection of the same, and any feelings that either have about those relationships and/or antics, if any, are for those people to share with me. Not to be a jerk, seriously, but given the open animus between you and Paigow and the history of my relationship with Slave I find it hard to believe that you are standing up for either of them or that they would want or need you to.

Pretty Little Flower 08-16-2006 12:38 PM

K Race
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Adder
Or so you think. I know I speak for other here when I say that we find you deeply annoying.

Yet oh so pretty!
I should have been more clear. By "enemy," I mean someone with whom there is a deep and searing mutual animosity. Not someones who find me annoying but about whom I could not give a rat's ass.

Pretty Little Flower 08-16-2006 12:40 PM

K Race
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Actually when I retired from socking, that hater poster may have retired too. Not that I know that, if you know what I mean and I hope that you do or at the very least that you can infer what I may be implying. Or not. sts.

Cheerio mate,

P
Oh no, this enemy is no current/former sock of a poster that may or may not be Penske, iykwim. This is a real live, in the flesh enemy.

sebastian_dangerfield 08-16-2006 12:41 PM

K Race
 
Quote:

Originally posted by LessinSF
No, and I'm not sure why it should unless they make cork tampons. Or does butter (Cork's historically most famous product) have something to do with menstruation? (One of Penske's socks is now on the clock).

Rather, it was your (admittedly only through a stretch of my own) ambiguous use of the word.
Marinara is made with olive oil, not butter.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:21 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com