![]() |
Doggie Day Care
Quote:
No, no one actually takes their dogs there. Those "owners" are actors. |
Reality TV Meets Curb
Quote:
|
Bambi movies
When you think you're having a bad day, remember these bird-watchers:
"Birdwatchers from all over Britain who gathered in Grimsby to catch sight of a rare American robin were horrified to see her eaten by a passing sparrowhawk. They were still setting up their cameras when the predator swooped down from a row of drab factories and warehouses on an industrial estate." http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3545679.stm |
hells angels
Quote:
Coincidence. Actually originally they were supposed to leave town before Phelps comes. I think the police are concerned they will get wind of what is going on and decide to stay. If not the group, one or two who might be looking for trouble. We are showing a movie and they are concerned, for some reason, about the movie, but not about the rest of our plans. I am thinking I am missing something, but who knows. |
Doggie Day Care
Quote:
|
bangs
Quote:
I thought so. |
obe
Quote:
|
obe
Quote:
penske_account has selected the "Hello Kitty" IMVironment. penske_account: allo ami p_l_flower: Allo p_l_flower: Comment ca va? penske_account: thanks for skooling the newbies on altamont p_l_flower: Well p_l_flower: You know penske_account: buenos tiempos buenos tiempos penske_account: one quibble p_l_flower: Paigow lords her old skool knowledge over them penske_account: iyw p_l_flower: iw penske_account: thanks penske_account: I knew you would p_l_flower: You're welcome penske_account: anyhoo penske_account: the quibble p_l_flower: I sensed you knew p_l_flower: Yes p_l_flower: On to the quibble penske_account: i was there, although under an array of socks penske_account: you wound me penske_account: with the exclusion p_l_flower: I omitted you to protect you penske_account: hmmmm penske_account: boc!!!!!!!!!! penske_account: hahahaha! p_l_flower: You knew what you did that day penske_account: well done penske_account: smashing penske_account: ! p_l_flower: I think it is best to say penske_account: yes penske_account: on that day I came as skek6 p_l_flower: That what happened at Altamont stays at Altamont penske_account: oh the memories |
hells angels
Quote:
|
Long time since we had a fat fight -
Quote:
Then again ... if opera is going to survive as anything but an historical curiosity it needs to do what it can to broaden its appeal, and in the theatrical/performance arts, that means visual panache. And enough people can sing pretty damn well, if not quite deborah voigt well, that the physical appearance may soon be the rarer, and more valuable, comodity. (See: this month's W has and entire article about a "hunky" singer who is the latest thing, whose name escapes me, but the focus is definitely not on the superior quality of his voice. Bryn Terfel may make you believe in God when he opens his mouth and you simply cannot believe what has come out of it, and he may absolutely seem the kind of guy you want to hang out with for a beer and a match, but "hunky" he isn't.) |
obe
Quote:
Posts like that make the benefits of not being penske that much more pronounced. U 2 are wackadoo! |
A new appreciation for an old annoyance
The girlfriend who calls the boyfriend at work multiple times a day. I apologize to any man I might have done this to in the past. And their co-workers in the office next door.
|
"You shot the Bible Thumper but spared the Militant Lesbian."
Quote:
It makes sense that this wouldn't necessarily extend to renouncing marriage as a civil/legal institution entirely (why leave it to the religious sects; there are decent reasons for public, society-wide registration of a status that lots of individual private entities may be granting or enforcing or whatever, just to avoid chaos; further, it is a convenient way for people to designate the person they choose as their defacto proxy for lots of pretty important stuff that no one thinks about, like who is authorized to pick your kids up from school, make health care decisions, etc, which would be a pain in the ass to separately arrange for, as gay couples have discovered); but with respect to any special treatement in public subsidy/benefits, yeah, probably it does (particularly since the Libertarians are in favor of abolishing most of the benefits with respect to which spouses get priority or survivor status, anyhow). Logically, yes, I think this freedom of choice would extend to a polyandrous lifestyle. For the Libertarians, a lot of potential problems with recognizing polygamy, like "just exactly how many wives should be able to claim SS survivor benefits, anyway?" disappear in a perfect world, too. |
Luggage & Laptops
Quote:
|
A new appreciation for an old annoyance
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com