Shape Shifter |
08-01-2005 01:11 PM |
CAFTA
Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Cuba is the poorest economy south of the border and the most oppressive government. You say sovereigh government like it should mean something to me. Just because most countrys recognize a government doesn't make it the legitimate ruler of a nation. Castro is a criminal thug who is holding a whole nation hostage.
If you believe the only reason for armed intervention if another country is if they pose a national security risk you are the one most "bereft of morality and brains" than anyone on this board. So I guess you think think that Clintons involvements in Serbia, Somalia and Haiti were all wrong? None of these countrys posed a national security threat to us.
I wish he were only annoying. He is the largerst human righs abuser in this hemisphere.
Unlike you I don't think we should judge whether or not an invasion is justified based on the rest of the world's opinion.
1) So did bombing Serbia make us a roque nation?
2) If you are witnesseing a a rape is it wrong to stop the rape if that rapist poses no threat to you? If it is OK to stop the rape, and Castro is raping his nation every day, what is wrong with stopping him?
|
Many of your points are well taken. I won't respond point-by-point (other than to note that your inability to distinguish Serbia and Cuba means you made the right decision in leaving the practice of law) because you don't seem to get that this really isn't about Cuba*. The "justifications" you provide for an unprovoked invasion of Cuba heads down a dangerously slippery slope.
The reasons you've just given could (and would) be adopted by other nations whose intentions may not be as lily white as ours. India could invade Pakistan, China could invade the oil-rich 'Stans, hell, Saddam could have made similar arguments for invading Kuwait. Any objections we would have would be countered by pointing the finger to our actions in Cuba.
What you are advocating is a dangerous and irresponsible approach to the use of military power. If we don't use restraint, how are we to persuade others to be similarly restrained.
*I have to ask, though: Aren't we having enough problems with the Arab Street? Would we really want to deal with the Arab Street and the Latin American Street at the same time?
|