| sebastian_dangerfield |
11-10-2005 07:41 PM |
frere Jaques, frere Jaques, dormez-vous?
Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
they're not gonna elect an American.
I could care less if said leader was anti-religious or not. I would settle for honourable. An honourable leader of France, even were he completely opposed to our foreign policy, would be wonderful. We would know where he stood, we could use logic to persuade him, and he would likely support us in our basic premises anyway.
|
While you're shopping for one for France, see if they have an extra we could buy cheap...
I agree the French are chickenshit fair weather friends with no honour.
But Honour is not merely appearing to be honorable. Its not merely saying you're for God, Mom and Apple Pie and get misty when you hear the Star Spangled Banner. Its not just crafting a public image of being resolute, decisive and less movable than a face on Rushmore. Its not Karl Rove spinning you as The Everyman who gets behind Jesus Lovin Folks.
Honor is not lying. Honor is telling the country the reality of your policies, instead of naming them with monikers which imply they help people they acctually hurt. Honor is having the balls to stand up and say "I stand for rolling back some of the New Deal and making people more accountable for themselves instead of relying on govt to save them" and letting people vote on that simple principle - and losing if the populous doesn't agree. Honor is being transparant about your agenda.
Bush is not honorable. He just plays at that on television. At least Chirac is a smarmy liar to your face.
|