LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   A Forum for Grinches and Ho-Ho-Hoes (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=643)

Tyrone Slothrop 02-21-2005 02:07 PM

Apparently this is popular among the Conservative Political Action Conference
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
lip smacking so hard in between another order (of ) McDonald's Meatfood.
Laughing So Hard I Blew Coffee All Over My Monitor

It's why the crappy coffee was keeping her from seeing the masturbation joke, eh?

sgtclub 02-21-2005 02:08 PM

Freedom on the March
 
Protests in Lebanon against Syria

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...i063538S45.DTL

Replaced_Texan 02-21-2005 02:09 PM

Freedom on the March
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
Protests in Lebanon against Syria

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...i063538S45.DTL
Question: have you always been a neocon or is this a retroactive conversion?

ltl/fb 02-21-2005 02:09 PM

Apparently this is popular among the Conservative Political Action Conference
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
. . . , eh?
What are you, a fucking Canadian?

Hank Chinaski 02-21-2005 02:11 PM

Freedom on the March
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Question: have you always been a neocon or is this a retroactive conversion?
Fox says Syria is pulling its troops out of Lebanon- that's good isn't it?

bilmore 02-21-2005 02:15 PM

Freedom on the March
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Question: have you always been a neocon or is this a retroactive conversion?
I'm now thinking my definition of "neocon" must be horribly wrong.

sgtclub 02-21-2005 02:17 PM

Freedom on the March
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Question: have you always been a neocon or is this a retroactive conversion?
I'm not sure what my post has to do with neoconservatism, but the answer is no. I just agree with the administration that supporting the spread of freedom, human rights, and, if possible, democracy, is both a moral imperative and the the best course for protecting American interests.

ltl/fb 02-21-2005 02:19 PM

Freedom on the March
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
I'm not sure what my post has to do with neoconservatism, but the answer is no. I just agree with the administration that supporting the spread of freedom, human rights, and, if possible, democracy, is both a moral imperative and the the best course for protecting American interests.
Um, define "human rights."

bilmore 02-21-2005 02:20 PM

Freedom on the March
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
I just agree with the administration that supporting the spread of freedom, human rights, and, if possible, democracy, is both a moral imperative and the the best course for protecting American interests.
Effing warmongering hegomonist.

ltl/fb 02-21-2005 02:23 PM

Freedom on the March
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Effing warmongering hegomonist.
Hegemonist.

sgtclub 02-21-2005 02:24 PM

Freedom on the March
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Um, define "human rights."
The basic rights and freedoms to which all humans are entitled, often held to include the right to life and liberty, freedom of thought and expression, and equality before the law.

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=human%20rights

Replaced_Texan 02-21-2005 02:25 PM

Freedom on the March
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Effing warmongering hegomonist.
"benevolent global hegemon" was the term I thought they liked.

ltl/fb 02-21-2005 02:27 PM

Freedom on the March
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
The basic rights and freedoms to which all humans are entitled, often held to include the right to life and liberty, freedom of thought and expression, and equality before the law.

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=human%20rights
Equality before the law . . . guantanamo bay

sgtclub 02-21-2005 02:28 PM

Baathist to Surrender?
 
  • U.S. diplomats and intelligence officers are conducting secret talks with Iraq's Sunni insurgents on ways to end fighting there, Time magazine reported on Sunday, citing Pentagon and other sources.
    The magazine cited a secret meeting between two members of the U.S. military and an Iraqi negotiator, a middle-aged former member of Saddam Hussein's regime and the senior representative of what he called the nationalist insurgency.

    "We are ready to work with you," the Iraqi negotiator said, according to Time.

    Iraqi insurgent leaders not aligned with al Qaeda ally Abu Mousab al-Zarqawi told the magazine several nationalist groups composed of what the Pentagon calls "former regime elements" have become open to negotiating. The insurgents said their aim was to establish a political identity that can represent disenfranchised Sunnis.

The so-called insurgency has long consisted of two main elements, the al Qaeda-linked terrorists, most of whom are not Iraqis, and Baathist Sunnis whose objectives are more narrowly political. It sounds as though some of the latter group, at least, are ready to throw in the towel. Their violence had two main strategic objectives: first, to prevent President Bush from being re-elected; second, to prevent the Iraqi election from going forward. Both failed. If they give up, the terrorists will be isolated and can much more easily be defeated.

http://www.powerlineblog.com/


eft

sgtclub 02-21-2005 02:31 PM

Freedom on the March
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Equality before the law . . . guantanamo bay
Your point?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:41 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com