![]() |
Ultimate destination
Quote:
Let's say this ultimate God is called Fred and the place of eternal bliss with Fred is Fredland. I don't believe Fred is God. Not only that, I affirmatively reject Fred as God until my dying breath (because I said I don't know how God will deal with people who sincerely believe in God under a different name, the hypothetical is that this rejection is not because I think Ralph, not Fred, is God) . Should Fred force me into Fredland against my will? Let's say Fred is unbelievably more merciful than I could ever imagine and decides to give me one last chance to change my mind and believe in Fred just as I'm at the crossroads between Fredland and Nonfredland and reveals emself to me in all ems power and glory but like a little kid, I've (figuratively) got my eyes squeezed shut and am covering my ears yelling "There's no Fred! There's no Fred!" and continue to reject Fred. If Fred nevertheless pulled me into Fredland dsepite my rejection, isn't em disregarding my free will? In saying that people who reject God are "toast," I'm saying under that hypothetical, I would expect Fred to let me spend eternity in Nonfredland. A lot of you might have trouble with my second assumption and think that God would only be just and merciful if em takes everyone to Heaven despite the choices they make. That is a matter of faith and belief as much as my belief that God honors our free will. |
Ultimate destination
Quote:
So, do I get nothingness? Or am I "toast"? |
Ultimate destination
Quote:
|
and so
Quote:
|
Reading 101 for Wonk and TM
Quote:
Quote:
Besides Wonk, there is stuff in the New Testament about rain forest type people so that's not even a fair characterization of Christianity -- they don't get toasted just because they never heard about Jesus. And before you ask why missionaries go out if that's the case, the answer is that belief in God is about more than a fire insurance policy. |
Ultimate destination
Quote:
|
Ultimate destination
Quote:
|
Ultimate destination
Quote:
Everything you have said is hypothetical. You believe people are toast because they don't believe what you believe. If you grew up in a different house, you would be just as adamant about that random belief system as you are about this one. That's why you're a wingnut. TM |
Ultimate destination
Quote:
When it comes to what happens after death, it is a matter of belief and faith no matter what you believe or don't. As I said to Sebby, one of us is going to get a surprise when it's all over. I'd hate for it to be me. ETA: Yes, Thurgreed, it ultimately does come down to belief for me as well as for you. With no more evidence than I have, you believe what you believe (or don't believe, which is itself a belief system). But I don't call you moronic for your equally strongly held beliefs nor am I making any statements about where you will go after death. I do wish you had more joy in your life and from reading your posts over the last six months or so, your current belief system isn't doing it for you. |
Advanced Reality for Fugee
Quote:
TM |
Ultimate destination
Quote:
And, if Nonfredland is unpleasant, then I don't buy your "by not sending you to blissful Fredland, Fred is honoring your choice not to believe in Fred" thing. Say it like it is -- if you persist in not believing in Fred, Fred is going to send you to the eternal torment that is Nonfredland. Because it seems like you get sent there whether you say "I don't believe in Fred and I am looking forward to eternal torment! Yaaaay, torment!!" or say "I don't believe in Fred and don't believe there's an afterlife, and I am looking forward to ceasing to exist altogether when I die." If you were a nicer person, you would want me to be right about after death -- if you are right, I'm suffering eternal torment. This is kinda prisoner's dilemma-y. |
Ultimate destination
Quote:
|
Ultimate destination
Quote:
Second, you fail to account for those people who for cultural or geographic reasons never hear of Fred. Are they to be rejected by a just and merciful Fred simply because they never heard of him? Finally, I don't think you can ignore those people who believe in Ralph instead of Fred. Or, and here is where I part company with most Fundamentalists, I think it is a greater rejection of Fred to say that you can only know Fred through Ethel, and all who reject Ethel will go to NonFredland, notwithstanding that many believe in Fred, but believe that Ethel was nothing more than a very astute student of Fred. |
Change in Speak
Never thought I'd get tired of a religion discussion.
Does anyone have one of those >$100 fuzzy logic rice cookers? Care to wax rhapsodic about it and justify my impending purchase of one (we eat a fair amount of rice)? The likelihood I'd ever load one up and keep it full of hot, fluffy rice all day long is low. I need it to be fast, and foolproof, and non-stick. Tell me it's Tivo for rice, and I'm all on that like white on, um, Michael Jackson. |
and so
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:54 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com