This About Sums it Up
 

Hmmm..... maybe you should keep repeating it.

This About Sums it Up
 

Apparently Bob Woodward is going to get in on the fun:

• I hear that "Plan of Attack," supersleuth Bob Woodward's still-secret study of President Bush's war on terrorism, will be very bad for the Bush reelection campaign - which is still reeling from gun-toting former terrorism chief Richard A. Clarke's critique of Bush, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and other administration figures in "Against All Enemies."
  
  Woodward's book, to be released next month, will receive not only a multipart series in The Washington Post, but also the Mike Wallace treatment on "60 Minutes" April 18 - when I am absolutely confident that the common corporate ownership of CBS and Woodward's publisher, Simon & Schuster, will be mentioned.

link-a-dink-dink

This About Sums it Up
 

Yes. reeling. Woodward will be devastating, I'm sure, even though no one who might vote for Bush wouldgive a rat's ass what Woodward writes, or the W.Po. publishes, the book will kill Bush. Bush better hope Kennedy doesn't step into the fray, or the election'll be over by summer.

You understand reeling means only passed Kerry by 4 points.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politic...l_x.htm?csp=23

The wierdest part of this pool is that Nader votes splits between Bush/Kerry (2%-2%). The only way I can imagine Nader geeting Bush votes is Club told the poll he'd vote for Nader to get him to run due to the demand.

This About Sums it Up
 

I thought it was established that any link containing a picture of Michael Jackson needed a spree disclosure.

This About Sums it Up
 

I love that a GP is cite-checking my posts. I thought you had Atticus do this.

This About Sums it Up
 

I hate to have anyone anal enough to follow those rules checking up on me, though I guess there is the "sure he's an asshole, but he's our asshole," benefit.

This About Sums it Up
 

Be nice to Sidd, it's his birthday today.

Mark Shields has been chugging too much Red Bull and Jagr
 

.... and a Kerry/McCain ticket is his Fido.

I understand why Shields thinks such a ticket would show courage, and would be breathtaking, superb, astonishing, and all-around nifty!

What I don't get is how Shields can credibly propose it. Why the hell would McCain entertain such a thing? McCain probably hates Bush for delivering his very own Fido 2000, but it's hard for me to imagine the Senator acting on it by pissing away his Republican party membership. McCain ain't no Jeffords.

Or, am I just missing something?

Mark Shields has been chugging too much Red Bull and Jagr
 

McCain is not getting younger, but what's unclear to me is why he'd rather be the Vice President than a Senator.

Club, what was that about the Commission featuring partisan whores? The ranking Democrat on the House Committee on Government Reform just wrote a letter to the White House Counsel asking for confirmation that he made phone calls to certain Commission members during Clarke's testimony last week. I guess they couldn't be trusted to hit the right talking points.

Mark Shields has been chugging too much Red Bull and Jagr
 

Maybe he read the John Dean interview in Salon and thought that vice president equals co-president?

This About Sums it Up
 

And along comes Hank to remind us that looking at -- or even looking like -- Michael Jackson is far, far from as bad as things can get.

This About Sums it Up
 

Why did you both think this was a slam at Sidd? I was just commenting on the rules for the table form Ty's link. One hint would have been that having someone like sidd at your firm would not be a benefit, other than the old looking good in comparison test.

Waxman is a sober member - please. This is exactly what I'm talking about, using this thing for political gain.

Whether or not Waxman is sober or political, what about the allegation about what Gonzales was doing? Or do your views of Waxman just let you dispel those unsavory thoughts?

And compare for a moment the potential political gain from (a) feeding the Commission's GOP members question to use on Clarke, and (b) leaking a letter to the White House Council asking if it was doing the former?