LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   All Hank, all the time. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=734)

Hank Chinaski 05-20-2006 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Funny, I think it is obvious so you are the one that might try and give more than ten seconds of thought to this. The law wasn't necessary before because no one ever even thought that English should not be the predominate language. Until recently the idea of a bilengual education wasn't even considered.

But now you have social engineers that think mulitculturalism, as opposed to the melting pot, is the way to go. Until we got rid of it in California by proposition, you could pass the entire way through the California public schools without ever having to learn English.

There is a certain section of the population that thinks that a bilengual United States would be a good thing and many of these progressive thinkers are in positions of power throughout the government and are putting that agenda into policy. They had screwed up the California Public Schools for a while, until that was fixed, but there influence is being felt everywhere. Hence the need for legislation.
I for one think schools should concentrate on teaching proper spelling- at least of English.

baltassoc 05-20-2006 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky

So the rule is a government should cater to your language, and if it doesn't, you don't have to pay taxes? So when I was living in Japan, should I have refused to pay taxes because the tax forms were not provided to me in English?
You're the one who brought taxes into this. It's your sense of entitlement that's at issue. You seem to think that you should have the right to demand documents be only in English because you're a taxpayer. But other people who pay taxes but speak another language? Fuck them.

I'm actually in favor of a strong English education in our schools. I think ESL courses are not taught correctly. But this statute doesn't address that. I think that learning a passing level of English should be a requirement for naturalization citizenship (oh wait - it is!). This law doesn't address that, either. Instead, it's almost wholely symbolic.

This is a non-issue. But somebody thinks it's important, and I'm pretty sure those same people (or their kids) are going to be the ones bitching the loudest when Spanish becomes as widely spoken as English in this country.

ltl/fb 05-20-2006 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Funny, I think it is obvious so you are the one that might try and give more than ten seconds of thought to this. The law wasn't necessary before because no one ever even thought that English should not be the predominate language. Until recently the idea of a bilengual education wasn't even considered.

But now you have social engineers that think mulitculturalism, as opposed to the melting pot, is the way to go. Until we got rid of it in California by proposition, you could pass the entire way through the California public schools without ever having to learn English.

There is a certain section of the population that thinks that a bilengual United States would be a good thing and many of these progressive thinkers are in positions of power throughout the government and are putting that agenda into policy. They had screwed up the California Public Schools for a while, until that was fixed, but there influence is being felt everywhere. Hence the need for legislation.
this is a federal law, not a state law, that is being pushed. I think that your viewpoint is very, very shaped by being in California.

to me, the law seems more symbolic than anything else. symbolic in a nasty, evil way.

ltl/fb 05-20-2006 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I for one think schools should concentrate on teaching proper spelling- at least of English.
Yes.

Spanky, the plural of "country" is "countries." Maybe you need to focus on your own English?

ETA Hank PMed to say he was actually referring to bilENGual. Which actually is an interesting kinda error to have made . . .

Spanky 05-21-2006 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by baltassoc
You're the one who brought taxes into this. It's your sense of entitlement that's at issue. You seem to think that you should have the right to demand documents be only in English because you're a taxpayer. But other people who pay taxes but speak another language? Fuck them.
You were the first one to mention taxes. You asked if I still expected them to pay taxes even if the documents were not in their language. You are the king of the straw man argument. I never said I thought documents should only be in English because I pay taxes. Where the hell did that come from? It has nothing to do with taxes or my "sense of entitlement". Documents should be in English because that is the language of the nation. And the fact that that is being disputed just helps solidify the argument of why we need the legislation.

Quote:

Originally posted by baltassoc I'm actually in favor of a strong English education in our schools. I think ESL courses are not taught correctly. But this statute doesn't address that. I think that learning a passing level of English should be a requirement for naturalization citizenship (oh wait - it is!). This law doesn't address that, either. Instead, it's almost wholely symbolic.


This is a non-issue. But somebody thinks it's important, and I'm pretty sure those same people (or their kids) are going to be the ones bitching the loudest when Spanish becomes as widely spoken as English in this country.
Why do you find it so important to focus on who is going to be complaining when Spanish is widely spoken in this country?

Spanky 05-21-2006 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Yes.

Spanky, the plural of "country" is "countries." Maybe you need to focus on your own English?

ETA Hank PMed to say he was actually referring to bilENGual. Which actually is an interesting kinda error to have made . . .
The day I start proofreading these posts for grammar and spelling is the day my life has become as pathetic as yours. Hopefully that day won't come any time soon.

Hank Chinaski 05-21-2006 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
The day I start proofreading these posts for grammar and spelling is the day my life has become as pathetic as yours. Hopefully that day won't come any time soon.
2. Although I should remind you that most people have Fringey on ignore. When you quote her posts, you force those people to read her hate diatribes. Let's mind THAT border.

Hank Chinaski 05-21-2006 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky

Why do you find it so important to focus on who is going to be complaining when Spanish is widely spoken in this country?
His girlfriend reads the board and she's Mexican and he doesn't mind kissing ass. Like if things had worked out better you, might be posting on some strip club chat board about how Serbian woman are the ideal of beauty and almost never need implants.

baltassoc 05-21-2006 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
You were the first one to mention taxes. You asked if I still expected them to pay taxes even if the documents were not in their language.
"People can speak or learn any language they like, but if they want to interface with anything paid for by tax dollars it has to be English. "

Implicit in this statement is that it is a waste of tax dollars to use anything but English. Implicit in that statement is the idea that only English speakers have a right to have a say in the proper use of tax dollars.

Why?

And I'll remind you that the "we were here first" argument is incorrect, at least with regard to California (and Texas).

My point with the bitching issue is that one must be careful what one demands - the same people who insist that there can only be one language for the govenrment are likely to regret that choice when the future majority of the country decides they were correct about the one language thing,* but decides to change the language.

* As to the correctness of the one language thing in general, I'd point out that many countries have multiple official languages, and for much the same reason (combinations of lands where the populations speak another language - and this is this case here: Spanish is so widely kept in the US because there has always been a large geographically concentrated base of Spanish speakers in certain parts of the country who became citizens without the necessity of learning English - they were there when the territory they lived in became part of the US. Obviously, not all or even most Spanish speakers are decendants of these original settlers, but their presence has created a continuity of community in the Southwest especially, with some migration to oher areas).

Switzerland has four official languages, one of which is spoken by less than 70,000 worldwide.

dtb 05-22-2006 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
The day I start proofreading these posts for grammar and spelling is the day my life has become as pathetic as yours. Hopefully that day won't come any time soon.
To.

Tal.

Burn.

Hank Chinaski 05-22-2006 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by baltassoc
"People can speak or learn any language they like, but if they want to interface with anything paid for by tax dollars it has to be English. "

Implicit in this statement is that it is a waste of tax dollars to use anything but English. Implicit in that statement is the idea that only English speakers have a right to have a say in the proper use of tax dollars.

Why?

And I'll remind you that the "we were here first" argument is incorrect, at least with regard to California (and Texas).

My point with the bitching issue is that one must be careful what one demands - the same people who insist that there can only be one language for the govenrment are likely to regret that choice when the future majority of the country decides they were correct about the one language thing,* but decides to change the language.

* As to the correctness of the one language thing in general, I'd point out that many countries have multiple official languages, and for much the same reason (combinations of lands where the populations speak another language - and this is this case here: Spanish is so widely kept in the US because there has always been a large geographically concentrated base of Spanish speakers in certain parts of the country who became citizens without the necessity of learning English - they were there when the territory they lived in became part of the US. Obviously, not all or even most Spanish speakers are decendants of these original settlers, but their presence has created a continuity of community in the Southwest especially, with some migration to oher areas).

Switzerland has four official languages, one of which is spoken by less than 70,000 worldwide.
If you moved to Mexico not only would you have to learn spanish, you wouldn't be able to get a job.......for reasons beyond your professional shortcomings.

http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/14635383.htm

Replaced_Texan 05-22-2006 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
If you moved to Mexico not only would you have to learn spanish, you wouldn't be able to get a job.......for reasons beyond your professional shortcomings.

http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/14635383.htm
You know, in another forum where I'm having the exact same argument, everyone keeps on bringing up other parts of the world and how they do things as an excuse as to how we should do hings.

We, in the United States, are better than everywhere else in the whole wide world. We don't need to look anywhere else, because we've done just fine for 230 years figuring this stuff out on our own.

The fucking French have a complex over the fact that theirs isn't the lingua franca anymore. Is theirs the culture you really want to emulate?

Replaced_Texan 05-22-2006 12:03 PM

Does it surprise anyone that this guy was from New Orleans?

Secret_Agent_Man 05-22-2006 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
His girlfriend reads the board and she's Mexican and he doesn't mind kissing ass.
Isn't that a topic for a different Board?

:drool:

S_A_M

futbol fan 05-24-2006 11:22 AM

It's a war of ideas. Oh, fuck.
 
Hertzberg writing on the crackpot letter from Iran and the opportunity it would have presented to an administration capable of articulating what it is that makes us different from the mullahs.

Quote:

One can imagine a letter from an American President. It would go beyond nuclear warnings to ask a few questions of its own—questions about the Iranian regime’s suppression of freedom of expression, routine use of torture, domination by unelected clerics, and persecution of ethnic and religious minorities. It would refute, in detail, Ahmadinejad’s ugly fantasies about the Holocaust and 9/11, which are common currency among parts of the Muslim public.

Much of Ahmadinejad’s letter is devoted to religious hectoring, culminating in an appeal to Bush’s faith. The Iranian President writes that he has “been told that Your Excellency follows the teachings of Jesus (Peace Be Upon Him) and believes in the divine promise of the rule of the righteous on Earth.” One can imagine an American President responding that he believes in the rule of the people, righteous and unrighteous alike, exercised through democratic institutions. It’s a little harder to imagine that response from this particular American President. But one can dream.
Full text.

Hank Chinaski 05-24-2006 11:26 AM

It's a war of ideas. Oh, fuck.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
Hertzberg writing on the crackpot letter from Iran and the opportunity it would have presented to an administration capable of articulating what it is that makes us different from the mullahs.



Full text.
So now that OBL has exonerated Mousawwi(sp) do you think we should let him go?

futbol fan 05-24-2006 11:30 AM

It's a war of ideas. Oh, fuck.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
So now that OBL has exonerated Mousawwi(sp) do you think we should let him go?
I think it's analogous to the Graham Sankey confession scenario. Sankey should go to Bulgaria, OBL should come here and testify.

Hank Chinaski 05-24-2006 12:13 PM

It's a war of ideas. Oh, fuck.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
I think it's analogous to the Graham Sankey confession scenario. Sankey should go to Bulgaria, OBL should come here and testify.
Not the same- everyone agrees a UK football fan shoould be subject to indefinite incarceration- surely he's guilty of something. but you feel the same should not be true for terrrorists Jihadis.

futbol fan 05-24-2006 12:36 PM

It's a war of ideas. Oh, fuck.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Not the same- everyone agrees a UK football fan shoould be subject to indefinite incarceration- surely he's guilty of something. but you feel the same should not be true for terrrorists Jihadis.
Yeah, they should all be turned loose immediately and given one meelyon dollars and tenured jobs teaching pre-school.

This is poor, even for you - maybe you should have posted this with your Wank McBumsky sock? It's a good thing the quality czar never ever looks at this board.

Hank Chinaski 05-24-2006 12:47 PM

It's a war of ideas. Oh, fuck.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
Yeah, they should all be turned loose immediately and given one meelyon dollars and tenured jobs teaching pre-school.

This is poor, even for you - maybe you should have posted this with your Wank McBumsky sock? It's a good thing the quality czar never ever looks at this board.
i don't sock.

Wank McBumsky 05-24-2006 02:52 PM

It's a war of ideas. Oh, fuck.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
I think it's analogous to the Graham Sankey confession scenario. Sankey should go to Bulgaria, OBL should come here and testify.
Not the same- everyone agrees a UK football fan shoould be subject to indefinite incarceration- surely he's guilty of something. but you feel the same should not be true for terrrorists Jihadis.

Wank McBumsky 05-24-2006 02:54 PM

It's a war of ideas. Oh, fuck.
 
[deleted by poster] [eom]

:eek: :( :rolleyes: :)

Pretty Little Flower 05-24-2006 06:15 PM

It's a war of ideas. Oh, fuck.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
Yeah, they should all be turned loose immediately and given one meelyon dollars and tenured jobs teaching pre-school.

This is poor, even for you - maybe you should have posted this with your Wank McBumsky sock? It's a good thing the quality czar never ever looks at this board.
I come over here for the first time in, like, forever to see what is going on with the Wank McBumsky Newber, and I see that you are still talking about me. I have to admit that I am a bit flattered, although I find it a bit creepy.

Hank Chinaski 05-24-2006 06:30 PM

It's a war of ideas. Oh, fuck.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Pretty Little Flower
I come over here for the first time in, like, forever to see what is going on with the Wank McBumsky Newber, and I see that you are still talking about me. I have to admit that I am a bit flattered, although I find it a bit creepy.
i think it's just Ironsped. and if you read his posts more regularly I think you'd come to realize the thoughts and images conveyed by almost all his posts are kind of creepy.

Wank McBumsky 05-24-2006 07:44 PM

It's a war of ideas. Oh, fuck.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Pretty Little Flower
I come over here for the first time in, like, forever to see what is going on with the Wank McBumsky Newber, and I see that you are still talking about me. I have to admit that I am a bit flattered, although I find it a bit creepy.
Whats creepy about Ironsped is even worse that he cited my name before i even posted, like he can see the future. , but not in a good way. today Hil was on the news and they asked her about her presidential campaign, and she said "the future is what the future is." she doesnt' know Weed.

Replaced_Texan 05-24-2006 08:03 PM

It's a war of ideas. Oh, fuck.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Wank McBumsky
Whats creepy about Ironsped is even worse that he cited my name before i even posted, like he can see the future. , but not in a good way. today Hil was on the news and they asked her about her presidential campaign, and she said "the future is what the future is." she doesnt' know Weed.
Hay muchos calcetines aquí hoy. Más que generalmente.

Hank Chinaski 05-24-2006 08:42 PM

It's a war of ideas. Oh, fuck.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Hay muchos calcetines aquí hoy. Más que generalmente.
Los calcetines se parecen sucios y llenos de agujeros.

Wank McBumsky 05-24-2006 08:44 PM

It's a war of ideas. Oh, fuck.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Hay muchos calcetines aquí hoy. Más que generalmente.
Whats creepy is Ty@50 PMd me last week and said that when Jeb Bush becomes president he makes spanish the official language of los estados unidos. it seems again fututre is now on this board.

Wank McBumsky 05-24-2006 09:29 PM

It's a war of ideas. Oh, fuck.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Los calcetines se parecen sucios y llenos de agujeros.
i am unclear on what you are saying. what translation page do you use?

sgtclub 05-25-2006 11:56 AM

But The Economy is Still Bad
 
  • WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. economy shot forward at an upwardly revised 5.3 percent annual rate in the first quarter, the fastest growth in 2-1/2 years, as companies built up inventories and exports strengthened, a Commerce Department report on Thursday showed.


http://today.reuters.com/news/newsar...src=rss&rpc=23

spookyfish 05-25-2006 01:21 PM

No longer an "allegedly bad" Lay.
 
Lay and Skilling convicted.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12968481/?GT1=8199

Sexual Harassment Panda 05-25-2006 01:21 PM

But The Economy is Still Bad
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
  • WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. economy shot forward at an upwardly revised 5.3 percent annual rate in the first quarter, the fastest growth in 2-1/2 years, as companies built up inventories and exports strengthened, a Commerce Department report on Thursday showed.

I found a new avatar for you. Maybe you could name it "ALL IS WEELLLLL!!"

Hank Chinaski 05-25-2006 01:23 PM

But The Economy is Still Bad
 
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Sexual Harassment Panda
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
  • WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. economy shot forward at an upwardly revised 5.3 percent annual rate in the first quarter, the fastest growth in 2-1/2 years, as companies built up inventories and exports strengthened, a Commerce Department report on Thursday showed.

I found a new avatar for you. Maybe you could name it "ALL IS WEELLLLL!!"
keep in mind that this is all without support from Clinton's contrived tech bubble.

For debate: Clinton's creation of a false economy through the tech bubble cost middle class investors far more of their savings than anything done by Skilling and Lay.

Replaced_Texan 05-25-2006 01:26 PM

This freaks me out.

Sexual Harassment Panda 05-25-2006 01:45 PM

But The Economy is Still Bad
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
keep in mind that this is all without support from Clinton's contrived tech bubble.

For debate: Clinton's creation of a false economy through the tech bubble cost middle class investors far more of their savings than anything done by Skilling and Lay.
I have too little knowledge to engage. Perhaps I'll leave it to the good folks who used to work at Enron, the rank and file employees who had to fill their 401(k)s up with Enron stock, then were frozen out of their accounts and couldn't sell until the stock was worth next to nothing*, to discuss it with you.

Here's a better one - Hillary's torture and murder of Vince Foster scared so many middle class investors that they couldn't pay attention and missed all the signs that they should sell out of the bubble, and that cost them far more of their savings than high gas prices, the falling dollar, or tax cuts for the wealthiest 1% of Americans coupled with rising health care costs.

*It goes without saying that Lay and Skilling were exempted from this and could therefore dump their stock holdings while it was still worth something. If you don't believe me, rent "The Smartest Guys in the Room". I can't wait til those guys are prison rec yard love dolls.

Sexual Harassment Panda 05-25-2006 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
This freaks me out.
Thanks, I've been looking for a new sig line for a while.

Sexual Harassment Panda 05-25-2006 01:51 PM

GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY!!!!
 
HOOO-YEAHHH!!!!

Hank Chinaski 05-25-2006 01:59 PM

But The Economy is Still Bad
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sexual Harassment Panda
I can't wait til those guys are prison rec yard love dolls.
You approve of rape as a punishment for crimes? Nice.

Hypo- in Islamic republics where they rape female prisioner as part of their torture- do you approve? assume the crime was very bad

Replaced_Texan 05-25-2006 02:10 PM

But The Economy is Still Bad
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
You approve of rape as a punishment for crimes? Nice.

Hypo- in Islamic republics where they rape female prisioner as part of their torture- do you approve? assume the crime was very bad
Don't answer, SHP. State Secrets Privilege, ya know.

Sexual Harassment Panda 05-25-2006 02:12 PM

But The Economy is Still Bad
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
You approve of rape as a punishment for crimes? Nice.
Not so fast. Those who penetrate - sorry, perpetrate such acts should be tried in a court of law with competent counsel and full due process, as S&L were, and if convicted, punished to the fullest extent of the law consistent with the limitations set forth by the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America (We Stand as One! (Fuck Yeah!)). Thanks for playing, though.

Quote:

Hypo- in Islamic republics where they rape female prisioner as part of their torture- do you approve? assume the crime was very bad
Torture was only mentioned in the context of l'affaire de Vincent Foster, not in the Enron case, so your hypo is inapposite. But again, I deeply appreciate your thoughtful contributions and look forward to our future correspondences.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com