![]() |
murder
Quote:
BTW, I won the fight. Yay! ETA Die, motherfuckers, die! I say that for no particular reason. |
Is this true?
This may have already been discussed and I missed it, but I was talking to Lew Butler, who was the undersecretary of HEW under Nixon, and he told me that they considered the prescriptoin drug option but decided it was just a boondoggle for the drug companys.
He told me, and I don't know if it is correct, that under the new prescription drug deal it is illegal for the US Government to buy drugs wholesale from drug companies. Kaiser can buy drugs wholesale, but the one entity with the greatest purchasing power in the world can't bargain to buy the drugs. I would call that an example of the government not taking advantage of the benefits of the free market. This policy would make Lenin proud. |
Is this true?
Quote:
Though, I think that people covered by Medicare Part D have to enroll in plans, which may be able to bargain with the drug companies to get lower prices. RT can probably explain better, but probably not tonight. |
Is this true?
Quote:
|
Is this true?
Quote:
The provision was the subject of some criticism from the Democratic side of the aisle. A GOP President and Congress passed the bill with that kind of corporate welfare provision -- remarkable, isn't it? S_A_M |
Is this true?
Quote:
I'm sure RT can educate us on how it works under the VA system versus Medicare Part D. Veterans get free drugs -- pretty cool -- and I think that the VA system uses it's huge buying power to get very low prices. |
Is this true?
Quote:
I still can't get my hands around why states can't buy drugs from Canada. People should be able to buy what they want if they're willing to sign a waiver agreeing to take on reasonable risks associated with purchasing on an unregulated global market. |
Is this true?
Quote:
|
Is this true?
Quote:
corporate welfare = socialism |
"Fair and Balanced"
You just cannot make this stuff up. Never mind about the guy in the ICU - is the VP all right?
http://images.dailykos.com/images/us...tochen.JPG.jpg |
"Fair and Balanced"
Quote:
(b) Even more ridiculous is the reason offered by Scott McC on why neither the VP's office nor the WH issued a statement on the shooting earlier -- something to the effect of "they were focused on more important things, like the health of [whatever shot guy's name is]. Cheney visited him in the hospital." That is so pathetically lame. Yeah, everyone on his staff and the White House staff was working toward the health of shot guy, and so they weren't available to issue a statement. eta (c) that said, I wish that there'd been something on NPR this morning other than Scott McC's lame-ass explanation and descriptions of the heart attack. |
"Fair and Balanced"
Quote:
|
Is this true?
Quote:
I'm not saying I like the rule, but the issues are a lot more complex because with many drugs intellectual property is implicated. Drug companies like the cross-border bans because they can price based on the local market realities, without the arbitrage risk. If they had to price globally, prices would increase significantly in some countries other than the U.S. As a result those governments might decide not to recognize the IP rights, and allow generic production of the patented compound. At which point incentives for drug development would decline significantly. Of course there are good arguments against that point, but the argument is not trivial. |
"Fair and Balanced"
Quote:
But I think the answer is, more quickly than the shooting accident. I think it was reported the next morning, if not sooner. |
"Fair and Balanced"
Quote:
On b, Russert made teh interesting point that cheney's constituency is 1, Bush, since he's not running for election in 2008. He can give everyone the finger, basically. Of course, that may cost Bush, but it doesn't cost Cheney, at least until Bush cuts him loose, which he won't because that looks even worse than letting him continue to fuck around (and I say that's true even if Scooter Libby implicates him in open court on Plame). on c, listening to his explanations is good theatre. Sebby's description of him (it was more articulate than "fat fuck", but not too different) is still straight on. The guy is a hack who is really poor at explaining a bad situation. While he's not been blessed by spinnable stories, most people with that job still find a way. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:30 AM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com