![]() |
More Dim wit
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
More Dim wit
Quote:
|
More Dim wit
Quote:
Nice to finally get one question answered. Now what do I have to do to get you to actually answer (1) what resources did each of Nagin, Blanco and Bush have available; and (2) what was needed? Dude, I can match and exceed these (and my sister can match and exceed your sister's as well) but that's not the point. |
More Dim wit
Quote:
|
More Dim wit
Quote:
|
More Dim wit
Quote:
Blanco had the Louisiana guard. Based on the written plan that should have been good to start. Blanco punted on doing anything and per a quote I posted over the weekend, she waited to see what would happen and would then pick up the pieces. She didn't do such a good job on picking up the pieces. |
More Dim wit
Quote:
|
More Dim wit
Quote:
Loook, Nutso, if you want to hang Blanco for inaction, why aren't to ready to hang Bush beside her? Hang them all dammit. Blanco has access to about 7,000 Louisiana National Guard troops (there are about 11,000 in the guard, but 4,000 of them are in Iraq right now). Bush has dual and broader authority over the Guard. He also has the army, FEMA, and Homeland security. And every federal employee in the region. It took him two days just to do a fly-over. |
More Dim wit
Quote:
|
2008
Is Christopher Walken really running for President? The debates will be great.
|
Unbelievable bias pretending to be fair and balanced.
Quote:
I just stated facts. The fact that they were unpreprated for this catastrophe is a fact, not an opinion. You don't want facts. You want evidence of federal screw ups, and will believe anything that is printed that supports the idea that this was the Feds fault and yet you distrust even the most obvious facts that would show that the state and city screwed up. The reason why you cite Federal screw ups is because Bush is president. You defend the governor and the mayor because they are democrats. You say that you are not defending the mayor or the governor. Yet you keep asking what they could have done. You say you are not just trying to attack Bush when you keep citing alleged FEMA screwups. You say you have heard of no evidence showing mayoral or governor incompetance. The Buses have been all over the news. They were on the front cover of the Mercrury news day before yesterday. There were all over the TV (and we live in the same town) They have been the biggest news item. Yet you don't believe Penske's pictures? There have been constant reports of all sorts of city and state screw ups. Telling refugees to go to the wrong place, telling them to leave and then not to leave, not providing any transportation for people that want to evacuate. You would have to plug your ears not to hear of all the screw ups. Yet you have heard of nothing that shows they have screwed up. Yet even though you don't see any of this you find plenty of articles from all over the place that critisize the feds. The President asks to take control of the state resources and you immediately assume that Bush is playing politics. No evidence to suport it, you just make that assumption. But you say you need more facts in order to make an opinion. Please. You are a knee jerk ideologue that does not care about the facts or the truth. If there was any doubt, you sckepticism of Penske's pictures is the irrefutable proof. If there is one thing anyone that has watched the news for two minutes can be sure of, is that those buses caught in the flood were in the city of New Orleans and were municiple buses. |
Unbelievable bias pretending to be fair and balanced.
Quote:
Carry on. |
Unbelievable bias pretending to be fair and balanced.
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's one of the beauties, or anachronistic inefficiencies, as you please, of our federal system. The Feds can't respond until requested to do so by the state authorities, and even then, unless and until the Feds take over, the State is in charge of coordinating and deploying the requested resources. The Nat. Guard, police, troops, trucks, etc. were supposed to be under Blanco's direction. If she couldn't hack it, or if her command infrastructure was too damaged to permit her to coordinate, she needed to turn it over to someone who (in theory) could do it. She didn't, and fought the issue when the Feds tried to put things under military command - probably, frankly, the only institution with a strong enough command & organizational system to keep it together in such a situation. For a week people have been complaining mostly about the red tape, lack of communication, lack of direction, etc. I've been hearing a lot more about the failure to get troops, vehicles & resources anywhere near the people they are supposed to help than in there being no resources available - as others have noted, trucks of water & food, flotilas of drs, etc., were trying to get to the area but couldn't get in. The local military bases were (per CNN yesterday) put on alert the weekend before the storm hit, and were reportedly pissed as hell that no one deployed them while chaos errupted on TV (because that would be the equivalent of martial law, per Blanco, who's alternative to martial law was to issue "any means necessary" shoot-to-kill orders to the police to establish order). I am certainly not saying that, had FEMA/the Feds been properly in charge things would have gone much better, but at least it would have been centralized, which might have helped even in the face of rampant incompetence. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:44 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com