I was about to put an amusing remark here, but then I remembered.
 

I guess the distinctin is a little too subtle for some folks. You know the genesis of "benedcit arnold" . You understand it. that is the difference. That said, I dont use cliches except ironically bc I think they are trite, unoriginal, unexpresswive and, well, cliche. but many people do. fine. all I am saying is know the genesis of the saying. at a minimum you can appreciate how stupid it is and thus how stupid the term is without blindly uttering it like a member of some frat pledge class.

Fuck you Starbucks
 

Yet you seek out bad 60's fiction.

Historical question: Whose sock was "go go wolf"?

Fuck you Starbucks
 

You miss the point, counselor. Its not about whether I read it. Its about whether people who use it all the time know where it came from or whether they blindly mimic it like some kind of macaw with a law degree and time to kill. Its not about me in the slight. as i clarified in my discussion iwit plf who jumped to the same conclusion but understood the difference upon explanation. which i guess is the differencve between you and him.

I was about to put an amusing remark here, but then I remembered.
 

See? That's where you're wrong.* None of us really know the genesis of "Benedict Arnold."** We heard about it in grammar school from teachers who heard about it in their grammar school, and so on and so on and so on...*** Undoubtedly some historians think ole' Ben gets a bad rap. And some people who were actually there might think it's getting misused.**** And listening to those people complain about it would be every bit as boring as reading your complaints about the use of "Timmy."*****


*Okay, one place where you're wrong. I've got limited time today.

** Go ahead, prove me wrong. Tell me exactly what Ben did, and when, and why. Without using Google.

*** Two points if you can tell me the genesis of "and so on, and so on, and so on." Because if you can't, and you weren't there, you don't get to use those words.

**** Bilmore?

***** Is it apropos to say that you are being a Timmy Timmy?

I was about to put an amusing remark here, but then I remembered.
 

I dont read asterisks bc they are anal lawyer nonsense. That said, I doubt you have the capacity to understand where I am right or wronb bc you are some kind of blustery litigator who tends to be overconfidence about his positions, whether in the court, on the board, or probably in life, if I know your type, and based ont he number of asterisks you ahve to rely on, I think I do.

Bitch please.
 

This is so not entertaining.

I was about to put an amusing remark here, but then I remembered.
 

Post edited because, well, Abba is right.

Bitch please.
 

You are not enjoying the monthly edition of paigow's point and how the unoriginal bluebook types miss it? But Less hasnt even arrived to pile on yet.

I was about to put an amusing remark here, but then I remembered.
 

This should shock no one, but you're not the first person today to ask this question.*

*You are, however, the first person to do it publicly.

Fuck you Starbucks
 

Well, since everybody has made it an official Fryday:

You didn't make it through last week as an adult. Let's not set our sights too high.

(Sorry, but I'm trying to match Board Tone . . .)

bnb str8 ENOUGH
 

Don't think I haven't wished for it more than once.

Bitch please.
 

"I love the smell of napalm in the morning."

Bitch please.
 

http://www.morganandwongonline.com/kilgore.jpg

.... It smells like ... victory.

New Nike Ad
 

RJ was short for Randy Johnson, who was mentioned in the quoted post. Try reading the whole thing dearie.

Fuck you Starbucks
 

You will need to be more self-indulgent and less entertaining.