LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   The Fashionable (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   More pie (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=747)

patentparanyc 09-15-2006 05:40 PM

Yummy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Her hair doesn't suck, and her breasts look nice from that angle, so with airbrushing, she too could look freakishly smooth. and her chipmunk cheeks could be shaved down. And maybe they could either make her forehead look a little bigger, or reduce her jaw, so her face would be more balanced.

I like the hair on the breast, though. Nice look. Partly because it doesn't look like a stylist carefully placed it there.
I think that is a bad sorta picture of Fergie, she has looked better...that being said she isn't ugly or anything and she does have nice abs and flat stomach....

Sidd Finch 09-15-2006 05:45 PM

Yummy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by pony_trekker
Anyone who says anything other than "I'd eat the peanuts out of her shit" is on krak.
ew.


How about the line from She's Gotta Have It? "Mama you so fine, I'd drink a whole tub a' yo' bathwater."

str8outavannuys 09-15-2006 05:47 PM

Does it really say that?
 
Stars is playing right now at ACL. Very very good band, with very very good songs. You can watch a live feed at AT&T's blue room site.

http://blueroom.att.com

J. Fred Muggs 09-15-2006 05:48 PM

Oh My God
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
Honey, if I had that stomach, you cannot imagine the things I would do in public.
But would you want that stomach if you had to take the face with it?

nononono 09-15-2006 05:50 PM

Yummy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by patentparanyc
that's like saying "take the shittiest employee on the floor, sleeping at his or her desk and look! they get the same salary if not more than you" there are models and then there are models.

Beautiful women have either very even features proportionate to their face shape [Carolyn Murphy perhaps] or distinctive features arranged in such a way as to invoke beauty [think Scarlett or Charlize] I'm about to butcher her name, but Asiwayra Rai or whatever the heck her name is like amazing looking. That is an ethnic look that her features are flawless, proportionate and her skin needs minimal airbrushing and her eyes pop with the light color. just fucking wow.

Oh, I see you're working with the 2007 version of Objective Standards of Beauty. I still have the 2006 version.

But to stay on point, if we may, I said she has a cute face and a great shape. And she apparently sells [whatever it is she's known for, and pictures of herself]. I assume she's not hawking haute couture. If she's on the cover of the Adam & Eve catalog rather than Vogue, assess accordingly.

patentparanyc 09-15-2006 05:51 PM

Yummy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by nononono
Oh, I see you're working with the 2007 version of Objective Standards of Beauty. I still have the 2006 version.

But to stay on point, if we may, I said she has a cute face and a great shape. And she apparently sells [whatever it is she's known for, and pictures of herself]. I assume she's not hawking haute couture. If she's on the cover of the Adam & Eve catalog rather than Vogue, assess accordingly.
I see what you are saying, but like even you said. Grace Kelly she's not.

Yeah, she kind of has that I shill schlock bikinis feel that uh catalog the cheese-ball one, Newport News? the one that instantly hits the circular file.

Hank Chinaski 09-15-2006 05:57 PM

Yummy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I would never, ever, ever consider eating the peanuts (or anything else) out of her shit. Except the girl as portrayed in that picture doesn't exist. The girl in that picture is a cartoon, and I don't think cartoons make shit. If there were some paper cartoon shit, and it had peanuts on it, I might eat those peanuts. Because they'd just be regular peanuts attached to a paper cutout. If they were attached with honey, I'd definitely eat them.
2 to all. Although, curiously enough, I do not eat honey roasted peanuts.

ThurgreedMarshall 09-15-2006 05:58 PM

Yummy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by nononono
Oh, I see you're working with the 2007 version of Objective Standards of Beauty. I still have the 2006 version.

But to stay on point, if we may, I said she has a cute face and a great shape. And she apparently sells [whatever it is she's known for, and pictures of herself]. I assume she's not hawking haute couture. If she's on the cover of the Adam & Eve catalog rather than Vogue, assess accordingly.
http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/...es/exBrick.jpg

TM

Hank Chinaski 09-15-2006 06:00 PM

Yummy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/...es/exBrick.jpg

TM
you might want to start looking for a photo of 2 bricks.

kafka_esquire 09-15-2006 06:00 PM

Yummy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/...es/exBrick.jpg

TM

There's a joke in there somewhere, having pulled that pic from Congress. . .

ltl/fb 09-15-2006 06:04 PM

Yummy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
2 to all. Although, curiously enough, I do not eat honey roasted peanuts.
But you would eat peanuts with honey on them?

SlaveNoMore 09-15-2006 06:05 PM

Yummy
 
Quote:

kafka_esquire
There's a joke in there somewhere, having pulled that pic from Congress. . .
Who the hell are you?

Sidd Finch 09-15-2006 06:07 PM

Yummy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by kafka_esquire
There's a joke in there somewhere, having pulled that pic from Congress. . .

Holy shit. First Leagl, now you. This is the week for the reappearance of the disappeared.

Hank Chinaski 09-15-2006 06:11 PM

Yummy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
But you would eat peanuts with honey on them?
in the abstract, yes. although if I found a photo of shit with honey and peanuts on it, I probably wouldn't eat it if I'm being honest. I live too close to a Tim Horton's to run any such risk for sweets.

kafka_esquire 09-15-2006 06:13 PM

Yummy
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Holy shit. First Leagl, now you. This is the week for the reappearance of the disappeared.
It's good to see that the boards haven't changed too much (I logged into the Polemics Board by mistake and learned all about Habeus Corpus as applied to foreign nationals on their own soil ... now my head hurts.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com