| Diane_Keaton |
02-28-2006 12:23 AM |
[the link is to a blog that describes how to perform an abortion] Interesting, but I think the author isn't getting that people would improvise and use different techniques and instruments. That's just a natural inclination (eh, don't have the onion for the recipe, but here let me use this potato). Okay, b/c her description of the process makes it seem like as long as you can get into the cervix, you can really go to town on the uterus, scraping and pulling. And she didn't even mention gloves, etc.
I think the only good part of her posting is that it will shock people into the reality that abortions will go on no matter what the law says and that people who warn about "back alley" abortions are not just stuck in the 70's or bluffing. She seems too quick to advocate illegal clinics where non-docs are trained and do the procedure. I think it would be better for the patient to have organizations that would, instead of performing the procedures, fund easy transportation out of the state. I mean free transportation and even volunteer escorts - I can easily see Americans rallying for this (I'd for sure give time and money to it). Of course, if you are sitting in the middle of the state, it's going to be a long ride.
Question: if the ban is upheld, and all abortions are illegal in SD, would that law apply to Native Americans? Could not doctor-staffed abortion clinics be set up in certain areas of SD? Seeing as SD docs aren't even performing the procedures now and doctors are coming into the state, why not?
(Yeah, Yeah, the docs could hit the Casino next door after the last D&C of the day, heh heh).
ETA:
Oh, and:
http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/ava...ine=1140982881
[add your favorite caption here]
|