Just when I thought I was starting to figure it out.
 

If one consults a Freudian dream analysis book this is a pretty standard read as a desire for dual input sex. that shows the limitation of Freudian analysis, and for that matter simply consulting the book.

Using more modern regressive- passive Jungian techniques, I reach a different conclusion. I believe your problem could be simply stated as not getting enough Carbos in your diet.

If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will
 

Then perhaps people should learn to stop for the roadblocks. Just a thought.

If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will
 

I won't stand here and listen to you spout this sort of anti-American crap. I'm outta here.

http://www.star-collector.net/autogr...rtreynolds.jpg

If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will
 

So if a car with arabs in it comes speeding at a roadblock we can shoot because it's likely a bomber, but if Europeans are speeding towards a roadblock we shouldn't shoot because they likely have an excuse?

i thought you were AGAINST profiling?

If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will
 

Don't get all defensive, it's a lame joke and a picture of Burt Reynolds fer chrissakes.

But, since you mentioned it, why are we still there at the roadblocks? Aren't we done liberating everybody yet? Or are we just there to make sure innocent people aren't being shot because of all the lawlessness and stuff?

If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will
 

If that's it, do you think they could shift a battalion into Detroit? wouldn't even be the homicide bombers bugging them.

If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will
 

Yep, that's it. We're there to keep innocent people from getting shot. And the sooner they learn that and submot to our will, the sooner we can stop shooting them.

If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will
 

I would think that an intelligent guy like you would realize how incredibly stupid the phrase "homicide bomber" sounds. It's even more transparent and pathetic than "freedom fries."

It's stupid shit like this that makes me wonder if the structuralists weren't at least partly right. Because if they were, and if these examples are the best we can do to define the Iraq construct, we're fucked for generations.

If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will
 

I've been using "Child-Murdering Islamist Scumbags" for several years now. Feel free to crib it.

If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will
 

That's catchy. I wonder why it's never caught on.

If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will
 

Remember when nfh said Enrique Iglesias wasn't popular because she never heard of him?

If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will
 

Is that like the opposite of, or at least an inferior, bon mot?

If the thunder don't get ya then the lightning will
 

No. Fill me in.

Just when I thought I was starting to figure it out.
 

Geez, I go away for a few days and it's like I was never here.

Just when I thought I was starting to figure it out.
 

You're only as good as your last tirade.