| sebastian_dangerfield |
03-03-2006 01:23 AM |
th
Quote:
Originally posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone
There's talk of state or local legislation to stop the payday advance scams. The lower income parts of town are crawling with them.
|
The payday lending bans are outrageous. WTF is the matter with this country? We have to coddle our consumers so they don't get taken by financial outfits? If a payday lender discloses fully the terms of the loan, why on earth should the govt step in and play babysitter? I understand we need babysitters because Americans can't manage themselves, but its damned pathetic. These "regulatory" shackles the govt throws into the marketplace are soft forms of prohibition, and I think that over time, they've made people weak and dependent on courts and govt to get their back when they don't read the fine print.
I got mugged in the 2000 market meltdown. Buyer beware. You play, you lose, you learn not to play stupidly next time. I understand people who take out payday loans might be in duress, but if not a payday loan, they'd be putting themselves in hoc to Citibank or MBNA/BOA. Why should Citi and BOA have free reign to play that market sector while a smaller bank doing the payday loans gets jackhammered by regulators? I guess that's a function of who can afford the bigger lobbying firm.
The last thing we need in this country is to be stopping more areas of business by regulating/legislating them out of existence.
I know just how wildly unpopular this diatribe will be with just about everyone. But haven't we tried enough progressive fixes in this country over the past 50 years. People say "Oh, my, we can't have a fully free market where the people aren't protected by the govt." Really? How do you know that? We haven't tried, have we?
|