LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   A Forum for Grinches and Ho-Ho-Hoes (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=643)

bilmore 01-07-2005 01:33 AM

uh oh
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
My search for "Nelson Report" and "implosion" turned up nothing. And notwithstanding who tends to quote him, I found no one suggesting that he is biased in some way.
Are you spelling "google" correctly? Cuz' . . . here's page 1 of, like, 1500, on my search . . .


... is, according to TPM sources and sources quoted in this evening's Nelson Report,
where the ... of this, and you would be correct to suspect that politics, or the ...
www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/003778.php - 12k - Cached - Similar pages

Air America Radio | The Al Franken Show
... Talking Points Memo describes Friday’s Nelson Report, a credible Washington-based
tip sheet that focuses on politics, Asia, trade policy, and foreign policy ...
www.airamericaradio.com/weblogs/ alfrankenshow/index.php?/franken/explosive/ - 23k - Cached - Similar pages

Air America Radio | The Al Franken Show
... The Nelson Report is a daily political tip sheet and analysis written for ... Katherine
Lanpher talk to Arianna Huffington about the power of grassroots politics. ...
http://www.airamericaradio.com/weblo...show/index.php - 57k - Jan 5, 2005 - Cached - Similar pages
[ More results from www.airamericaradio.com ]

CAIN: Issue: Collusion - Details of Source Material
... Rosemary Nelson Report Appendix D continued, [PDF File; 4641KB]. ... (2000) The Politics
Of Force: Conflict Management and State Violence in Northern Ireland. ...
cain.ulst.ac.uk/issues/collusion/source.htm - 15k - Cached - Similar pages

BAD ATTITUDES: Politics, War, Economy, Guess That About Covers It ...
... October 29, 2004. Politics, War, Economy ... Informed sources quoted by the influential
Nelson Report say explosives from Al Qaqaa are the “primary source” of ...
badattitudes.com/MT/archives/002037.html - 24k - Cached - Similar pages

Steve Gilliard's News Blog : Freedom is messy, it also kills and ...
... got out, but not released until today, when requested by The Nelson Report, State
Department ... of this, and you would be correct to suspect that politics, or the ...
stevegilliard.blogspot.com/2004/ 10/freedom-is-messy-it-also-kills-and.html - 33k - Cached - Similar pages

America's Debate -> Another Dropped Ball?
... The Nelson Report claims that QUOTE. experts were reluctant to say exactly how much
of ... Another told him, "You would be correct to suspect that politics, or the ...
www.americasdebate.com/forums/ index.php?showtopic=8333&mode=threaded - 78k - Cached - Similar pages

Morse Target
... of Samuels International and Editor of The Nelson Report, a respected ... of California,
Berkeley and did graduate studies in politics, developmental economics ...
www.jiaponline.org/specialreports/ 2001/march15/morse.html - 26k - Cached - Similar pages

RConversation: Politics
... 07:52 PM in Politics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack. ... War&Piece has exit
poll results from the Nelson Report also favoring Kerry. ...
rconversation.blogs.com/rconversation/politics/ - 42k - Cached - Similar pages

American Politics Journal -- Resistance Isn't Futile
American politics journal, ... Joshua Micah Marshall passes on an item from the Nelson
Report, a preeminent DC paper on foreign policy, that has grave, grave import ...
www.americanpolitics.com/20030114Baker.html - 17k - Cached - Similar pages

bilmore 01-07-2005 01:34 AM

Cool.

On Dec. 2, 2003, the Tucson Citizen published a letter to the editor that harshly criticized America's conduct of the war in Iraq. The following month, a group of local residents, offended by the letter, filed a lawsuit against the paper alleging "intentional infliction of emotional distress." The newspaper asked a local judge, Leslie Miller, to throw out the suit on First Amendment grounds, but she refused. Now, the Associated Press reports, the Arizona Supreme Court is considering whether to overturn Judge Miller's ruling.

Free speech problem, right? Lots of ACLU types up in arms?

Nope. Dead Silence.

( http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/ and then scroll down)

bilmore 01-07-2005 01:49 AM

I'll add:

Worked in Foreign Affairs for Carter;

Senior Advisor to Senator Byrd (so, maybe bipartisan, since he's got that whole Klan thingie going for him, I guess; )

and, probably most damning,


A Berkeley grad.

ETA -

Oh, and:

"The President in other words has tied himself to the tracks; somewhere in the distance even he can probably hear the faint whistling of the next train; and when it comes to rescue, there's not much help in sight. As Chris Nelson of the Washington insider newsletter the Nelson Report put it the other day, "It is not too soon to suggest that the Bush Administration is imploding on all issues at all levels. Where is the good news coming from? Gas prices at the pump are not going down. The Fed is raising interest rates. Houses, cars and the jobs they create will be curtailed."

http://www.motherjones.com/news/dail...05/05_527.html

(Sorry - it was May, not Feb.)

Tyrone Slothrop 01-07-2005 02:29 AM

uh oh
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Are you spelling "google" correctly? Cuz' . . . here's page 1 of, like, 1500, on my search . . .


... is, according to TPM sources and sources quoted in this evening's Nelson Report,
where the ... of this, and you would be correct to suspect that politics, or the ...
www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/003778.php - 12k - Cached - Similar pages

Air America Radio | The Al Franken Show
... Talking Points Memo describes Friday’s Nelson Report, a credible Washington-based
tip sheet that focuses on politics, Asia, trade policy, and foreign policy ...
www.airamericaradio.com/weblogs/ alfrankenshow/index.php?/franken/explosive/ - 23k - Cached - Similar pages

Air America Radio | The Al Franken Show
... The Nelson Report is a daily political tip sheet and analysis written for ... Katherine
Lanpher talk to Arianna Huffington about the power of grassroots politics. ...
http://www.airamericaradio.com/weblo...show/index.php - 57k - Jan 5, 2005 - Cached - Similar pages
[ More results from www.airamericaradio.com ]

CAIN: Issue: Collusion - Details of Source Material
... Rosemary Nelson Report Appendix D continued, [PDF File; 4641KB]. ... (2000) The Politics
Of Force: Conflict Management and State Violence in Northern Ireland. ...
cain.ulst.ac.uk/issues/collusion/source.htm - 15k - Cached - Similar pages

BAD ATTITUDES: Politics, War, Economy, Guess That About Covers It ...
... October 29, 2004. Politics, War, Economy ... Informed sources quoted by the influential
Nelson Report say explosives from Al Qaqaa are the “primary source” of ...
badattitudes.com/MT/archives/002037.html - 24k - Cached - Similar pages

Steve Gilliard's News Blog : Freedom is messy, it also kills and ...
... got out, but not released until today, when requested by The Nelson Report, State
Department ... of this, and you would be correct to suspect that politics, or the ...
stevegilliard.blogspot.com/2004/ 10/freedom-is-messy-it-also-kills-and.html - 33k - Cached - Similar pages

America's Debate -> Another Dropped Ball?
... The Nelson Report claims that QUOTE. experts were reluctant to say exactly how much
of ... Another told him, "You would be correct to suspect that politics, or the ...
www.americasdebate.com/forums/ index.php?showtopic=8333&mode=threaded - 78k - Cached - Similar pages

Morse Target
... of Samuels International and Editor of The Nelson Report, a respected ... of California,
Berkeley and did graduate studies in politics, developmental economics ...
www.jiaponline.org/specialreports/ 2001/march15/morse.html - 26k - Cached - Similar pages

RConversation: Politics
... 07:52 PM in Politics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack. ... War&Piece has exit
poll results from the Nelson Report also favoring Kerry. ...
rconversation.blogs.com/rconversation/politics/ - 42k - Cached - Similar pages

American Politics Journal -- Resistance Isn't Futile
American politics journal, ... Joshua Micah Marshall passes on an item from the Nelson
Report, a preeminent DC paper on foreign policy, that has grave, grave import ...
www.americanpolitics.com/20030114Baker.html - 17k - Cached - Similar pages
WTF? In the world where I live -- the Sun is yellow here -- simply establishing that lefties cite or quote a source does not establish that the source is biased or inaccurate. A lot of conservatives consult the phone book every day. This does not mean that the phone book is inaccurate or conservatively biased.

Tyrone Slothrop 01-07-2005 03:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
"The President in other words has tied himself to the tracks; somewhere in the distance even he can probably hear the faint whistling of the next train; and when it comes to rescue, there's not much help in sight. As Chris Nelson of the Washington insider newsletter the Nelson Report put it the other day, "It is not too soon to suggest that the Bush Administration is imploding on all issues at all levels. Where is the good news coming from? Gas prices at the pump are not going down. The Fed is raising interest rates. Houses, cars and the jobs they create will be curtailed."
Good God, man. He made a prediction in May that proved wrong. Clearly he's a mistake-riddled hack! And you defend the Bush Administration's statements about Iraqi WMD. Amazing.

bilmore 01-07-2005 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Good God, man. He made a prediction in May that proved wrong. Clearly he's a mistake-riddled hack! And you defend the Bush Administration's statements about Iraqi WMD. Amazing.
Lordy, man. I make a post with a bunch of stuff about Nelson. You say you can't find any such stuff. I start citing it to show you that, yes, it's there. You take one cite, and say, geez, one problem?

(P.S. In an unrelated matter, I note that Leahy's own experts yesterday agreed that the Geneva Convention would NOT apply to captured Al Queda members. I bet the oh-so-pleasant Leahy ripped them new ones following that hearing.)

bilmore 01-07-2005 11:07 AM

Wow
 
A truly horrifying article from TNR that I somehow missed a few months ago - one that opines that taxing higher income types at 90% actually helps them achieve a better, happier life, as they are relieved from the constant stress induced by having to make all those horrible spending decisions:

http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=RWWY...023bb236246010

I have reconsidered. I am now in favor of political assassination and torture.

Replaced_Texan 01-07-2005 11:35 AM

A Dallasite against spending a lot of money for a party?
 
Mark Cuban, owner of the Dallas Mavericks, is suggesting that Bush cancel all of the inauguration parties and give money to charity insteady*:

Quote:

Start by cancelling your inauguration parties and festivities.

Could there be anything more confusing and shocking than to read that our country was offering $35mm in aid to the areas affected by the Tsunamis, but that the cost of inauguration parties would be about $40mm?

Does anyone else think that this is wrong?

I realize that the cost for the inauguration is being picked up by corporate sponsors and people purchasing outrageously priced tickets. The question is why.

Why are all these corporations and people spending all that money? Hey I love a good party, but there ain’t no party like a $10,000 per ticket party. It’s a 10k dollar ass kissing. As an accountant, fund raiser when asked about the high prices to attend the Inaugural events told the NY Times, “its the cost of playing the game”.

Mr President, its time to change the game.

In your re-election campaign, you talked a lot about leadership. Your ability to lead in times like these. Your ability to set an example. Mr President, it’s time to show that leadership. It’s time to set an example.

Cancel all but the most basic inauguration requirements.

It should be the easiest decision of your 2nd term.

You, Laura and the girls can still have family over and appreciate your blessings. I’m sure people who want to get out and have a good time, will still find a way to have fun. But that 40mm dollars can go a long way. Instead of shaking hands all night and being driven from party to party, send them a thank you card letting them know that the corporate and individual donations that had been earmarked for fun, was now going to help more people than they could ever imagine. Without the hangovers.

The impact of cancelling the frills would be staggering. You would immediately send the message that you as President and we as a country, really do know how to prioritize. That we will start accepting financial responsibility.

It would be hard for other politicians to not follow your lead. You could ask them to do the right thing and give up something they can do without, so that there are dollars available for those who really need them.

Leadership starts at the top. Culture change can start with some things that really are easy to do.

And 40mm dollars going to help those really in need can have a huge impact.

Do the right thing. Send the right message. Lead by example Mr President.

*NOTE: This blog entry was written on December 31, before the US upped its pledge from $35mm to $350mm. I agree that it's a bit déclassé to spend more on inaguration parties than disaster relief.

Hank Chinaski 01-07-2005 11:39 AM

A Dallasite against spending a lot of money for a party?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Mark Cuban, owner of the Dallas Mavericks, is suggesting that Bush cancel all of the inauguration parties and give money to charity insteady*:




*NOTE: This blog entry was written on December 31, before the US upped its pledge from $35mm to $350mm. I agree that it's a bit déclassé to spend more on inaguration parties than disaster relief.
How much does he pay his starting center?

sgtclub 01-07-2005 11:42 AM

Get Fucking Over It
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
So could I, which means that I would completely trust any voting program which I wrote. And loaded into the machine. Which said machine I got to go through and wipe clean and test prior to loading. And which I could guard without fail from wiping to loading to voting to counting.

(But, it's not just the "secure" part. As long as the system isn't transparent - i.e., as long as people can't walk away absolutely KNOWING how they actually voted, and how the system recorded their vote, there's no solution. The perception of disenfranchisement - even by whackos - is enough to allow them to opt out of any sense of governance by the winner.)
Why can't we just do internet voting? Would that relieve your issues

sgtclub 01-07-2005 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
The Jerusalem Post reports, Sri Lanka requests more medical aid from Israel.
Beggars can't be choosers

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 01-07-2005 11:45 AM

Or Maybe You Can Use That Bomb of Yours
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
A truly horrifying article from TNR that I somehow missed a few months ago - one that opines that taxing higher income types at 90% actually helps them achieve a better, happier life, as they are relieved from the constant stress induced by having to make all those horrible spending decisions:

http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?pt=RWWY...023bb236246010

I have reconsidered. I am now in favor of political assassination and torture.
Even better, let's let the rich people torture him for fun.

Such sacrilege, suggesting that the net good in the world may be increased by 20 kids getting a college education rather than one rich dude spending his time shopping (let's see, maybe a blond for summer! to go with my yacht).

Hank Chinaski 01-07-2005 11:48 AM

enlightened government
 
the Mexican Government is publishing a guide to assist in safely sneaking into the US.
Quote:

Mexico Provides Guide to Illegal Immigration
The 32-page booklet, free with popular comic books and advertised at bus stations and government offices south of the border, comes courtesy of the Mexican government.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,143433,00.html


http://www.foxnews.com/images/149684...immigrants.jpg
The guide features illustrations and practical advice for how to enter the U.S. illegally and survive the journey on foot.

I'm sure the Bush administration- if it ran Mexico- would be urging abstinence from entering the country illegally.

bilmore 01-07-2005 11:50 AM

Or Maybe You Can Use That Bomb of Yours
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Such sacrilege, suggesting that the net good in the world may be increased by 20 kids getting a college education rather than one rich dude spending his time shopping (let's see, maybe a blond for summer! to go with my yacht).
"Net good in the world"?

Not my job, man.

Maybe my choice, but not my obligation.

sgtclub 01-07-2005 11:52 AM

Or Maybe You Can Use That Bomb of Yours
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Even better, let's let the rich people torture him for fun.

Such sacrilege, suggesting that the net good in the world may be increased by 20 kids getting a college education rather than one rich dude spending his time shopping (let's see, maybe a blond for summer! to go with my yacht).
What the fuck is "net good" in the world? In your world, isn't good relative?

Replaced_Texan 01-07-2005 11:57 AM

A Dallasite against spending a lot of money for a party?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
How much does he pay his starting center?
Dunno, and I don't know how much he personally gave for tsunami relief. One hopes, though, that the tuna industry rethinks their "Under the Sea" themed inaguration party.

Hank Chinaski 01-07-2005 12:05 PM

A Dallasite against spending a lot of money for a party?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Dunno, and I don't know how much he personally gave for tsunami relief. One hopes, though, that the tuna industry rethinks their "Under the Sea" themed inaguration party.
would it be bad if the tuna industry just told SE Asia "Sorry Charlie!"

Hank- the un-PC.

sgtclub 01-07-2005 12:18 PM

In SF News . . .
 
Gavin is getting a divorce.

sgtclub 01-07-2005 12:21 PM

Anyone Catch Arnold Last Night?
 
1 word - bold

Gattigap 01-07-2005 12:32 PM

Reading Room
 
Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
These genuinely repulsive, arrogant creatures survive only because the world's rich countries, the non-Turd World, allow them, too. We in the First World find it politically impossible to reveal their pronouncements as the cant they are. For many in Europe and among the New York Times crowd, helping maintain these mad vultures substitutes for genuine action, "The UN is on the job!"
Ya know, I don't think this State Department official really likes the UN at all.

Gattigap 01-07-2005 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Cool.

On Dec. 2, 2003, the Tucson Citizen published a letter to the editor that harshly criticized America's conduct of the war in Iraq. The following month, a group of local residents, offended by the letter, filed a lawsuit against the paper alleging "intentional infliction of emotional distress." The newspaper asked a local judge, Leslie Miller, to throw out the suit on First Amendment grounds, but she refused. Now, the Associated Press reports, the Arizona Supreme Court is considering whether to overturn Judge Miller's ruling.

Free speech problem, right? Lots of ACLU types up in arms?

Nope. Dead Silence.

( http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/ and then scroll down)
Why's it "cool?"

I enjoy chuckling at hypocrisy as much as the next guy, but I don't entirely follow the logic.
  • From wsj.com: "The AP reports the letter "suggested American soldiers in Iraq respond to attacks on them by killing Muslims at nearby mosques." The plaintiffs in the suit are "fearful Tucson Muslims" who said they decided "to keep their children home from religious schools" because they were intimidated by the letter. The judge ruled that, in her words, "reasonable minds could differ in determining whether the publication of the letter rose to the level of extreme and outrageous conduct.""

    Their conclusion: "But how can anyone who believes in free expression stand for anything other than laughing these plaintiffs out of court? It seems the champions of the Dixie Chicks, et al., are interested in defending offensive speech only when it is anti-American."

Uh, the letter was critizing US forces and alleged that they're retaliating by killing Muslims at nearby mosques. Sounds to me like ACLU et al should've actively supported the newspaper, but their reason for declining (whatever it was) doesn't sound like hypocrisy because the speech wasn't "anti-American."

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 01-07-2005 01:04 PM

Or Maybe You Can Use That Bomb of Yours
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
What the fuck is "net good" in the world? In your world, isn't good relative?
Why do you assume I'm advocating the guy's position? I was with Bilmore - let's roast him slowly over an open fire for even raising the idea of redistribution of wealth. Want a weenie, Club?

SlaveNoMore 01-07-2005 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gattigap
Why's it "cool?"

I enjoy chuckling at hypocrisy as much as the next guy, but I don't entirely follow the logic.
  • From wsj.com: "The AP reports the letter "suggested American soldiers in Iraq respond to attacks on them by killing Muslims at nearby mosques." The plaintiffs in the suit are "fearful Tucson Muslims" who said they decided "to keep their children home from religious schools" because they were intimidated by the letter. The judge ruled that, in her words, "reasonable minds could differ in determining whether the publication of the letter rose to the level of extreme and outrageous conduct.""

    Their conclusion: "But how can anyone who believes in free expression stand for anything other than laughing these plaintiffs out of court? It seems the champions of the Dixie Chicks, et al., are interested in defending offensive speech only when it is anti-American."

Uh, the letter was critizing US forces and alleged that they're retaliating by killing Muslims at nearby mosques. Sounds to me like ACLU et al should've actively supported the newspaper, but their reason for declining (whatever it was) doesn't sound like hypocrisy because the speech wasn't "anti-American."
Read it again. I think the writer was "suggesting" that American forces SHOULD retaliate against Muslims at nearby Mosques. Thus the letter writers' response.

Replaced_Texan 01-07-2005 01:09 PM

Heh
 
Palestinians baffled as to why Richard Gere wants them to vote.

"I don't even know who the candidates are other than Abu Mazen (Mahmoud Abbas), let alone this Gere," Gaza soap factory worker Manar an-Najar told Reuters Wednesday.

"We don't need the Americans' intervention. We know who to elect. Not like them -- they elected a moron."

Gattigap 01-07-2005 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Read it again. I think the writer was "suggesting" that American forces SHOULD retaliate against Muslims at nearby Mosques. Thus the letter writers' response.
Ah. The criticism of US forces were that they were not killing ENOUGH Muslims, instead of killing too MANY. My bad.

Sidd Finch 01-07-2005 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Read it again. I think the writer was "suggesting" that American forces SHOULD retaliate against Muslims at nearby Mosques. Thus the letter writers' response.

It's interesting that Bilmore believes that such a letter is the pinnacle of free speech.... but Bilmore advocates assassinating someone who writes in support of higher taxes.

Hypocrite, heal thyself.

(For the record: The Tuscon plaintiffs/judge are whacked, and the local ACLU should say that pretty damn loud.)

Tyrone Slothrop 01-07-2005 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Lordy, man. I make a post with a bunch of stuff about Nelson. You say you can't find any such stuff. I start citing it to show you that, yes, it's there. You take one cite, and say, geez, one problem?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but your "post with a bunch of stuff about Nelson" had nothing damning in it. Unless you think it's damning that some lefties have cited -- you seem to be ducking that point because it's a little too stupid. Hence my crack about the phone book. You started out by saying that Nelson was inaccurate and biased, but you've shown nothing on either score.

Sidd Finch 01-07-2005 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Correct me if I'm wrong, but your "post with a bunch of stuff about Nelson" had nothing damning in it. Unless you think it's damning that some lefties have cited -- you seem to be ducking that point because it's a little too stupid. Hence my crack about the phone book. You started out by saying that Nelson was inaccurate and biased, but you've shown nothing on either score.

Well, apparently he predicted in May that the Fed was going to increase interest rates. So that's a telling point.

bilmore 01-07-2005 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
It's interesting that Bilmore believes that such a letter is the pinnacle of free speech.... but Bilmore advocates assassinating someone who writes in support of higher taxes.
Really? That's interesting to you? How so?

bilmore 01-07-2005 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Correct me if I'm wrong, but your "post with a bunch of stuff about Nelson" had nothing damning in it. Unless you think it's damning that some lefties have cited -- you seem to be ducking that point because it's a little too stupid. Hence my crack about the phone book. You started out by saying that Nelson was inaccurate and biased, but you've shown nothing on either score.
I'll try this one last time.

You quote Nelson, who, using only those mysterious nameless sources, tells us that Bush doesn't even allow anyone to tell him bad news. You vouch for Nelson.

I say, wait, Nelson is not the paragon of unbiased and stunningly accurate information that you seem to imply - he is the darling of the liberal blogs, he pretty much just says things that are very critical of Bush, and he's not known for stunning insight. Josh calls him "our friend." I mention "implode".

You say, wait, none of those things exist on gooooogle. And I can't find any link to "Nelson Report" and "implode".

I say, wait, try "google", instead, 'cuz here's a bunch of those entries. Oh, and here's the post about "implode".

Sidd, insightful as always, says "oh, so he inaccurately forecast a rate hike? Boy, Bilmore, what a dummy you are."

You say I've found nothing damning about Nelson. You've misconstrued my thrust. I was damning your vouching for unattributed garbage.

Sidd Finch 01-07-2005 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Really? That's interesting to you? How so?

As I said, hypocrite, heal thyself.

I assume it's not your view that we all should rise up to protect free speech only when it advocates killing more Muslims, of course.

Hank Chinaski 01-07-2005 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
I'll try this one last time.
Not me. My Charlie poet having been ignored, and on this, the boringest day in PB history, I thought it appropriate to make a somber announcement. I have given it a lot of thought and have decided to retire from the internet-style Lawtalker lawyer chatting boards. I've learned a lot, I've laughed a lot, but ultimately, I believe it is time to move on. I will miss sharing my musical and grammatical insights and getting updated daily about who is sick and with what disease they have been stricken. And I will always have sweet memories of Friday Flame Wars and Juan the Marine. Thanks to everyone for everything.

Peace out.

Hank Chinaski

Sidd Finch 01-07-2005 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Sidd, insightful as always, says "oh, so he inaccurately forecast a rate hike? Boy, Bilmore, what a dummy you are."
Did I say "dummy"? Nope.*

I simply wondered how a quote by someone, the central point of which was to predict something that did in fact happen (and that was pretty obvious to everyone), shows the person not to be credible.




*Of course, is someone is posting at midnight about the merits or lack of merits of a blogger, res ipsa loquitor. But I didn't say it.

Tyrone Slothrop 01-07-2005 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gattigap
Why's it "cool?"

I enjoy chuckling at hypocrisy as much as the next guy, but I don't entirely follow the logic.
  • From wsj.com: "The AP reports the letter "suggested American soldiers in Iraq respond to attacks on them by killing Muslims at nearby mosques." The plaintiffs in the suit are "fearful Tucson Muslims" who said they decided "to keep their children home from religious schools" because they were intimidated by the letter. The judge ruled that, in her words, "reasonable minds could differ in determining whether the publication of the letter rose to the level of extreme and outrageous conduct.""

    Their conclusion: "But how can anyone who believes in free expression stand for anything other than laughing these plaintiffs out of court? It seems the champions of the Dixie Chicks, et al., are interested in defending offensive speech only when it is anti-American."

Uh, the letter was critizing US forces and alleged that they're retaliating by killing Muslims at nearby mosques. Sounds to me like ACLU et al should've actively supported the newspaper, but their reason for declining (whatever it was) doesn't sound like hypocrisy because the speech wasn't "anti-American."
FWIW, from personal experience I can tell you that the Arizona CLU can be remarkably slow to respond to pretty offensive situations, for whatever reason. Maybe they're all reptiles and get lethargic in the winter (hi Shapey!).

bilmore 01-07-2005 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
I assume it's not your view that we all should rise up to protect free speech only when it advocates killing more Muslims, of course.
Wow. You didn't get it at all. That's sort of surpr . . . .

No, it's not. Nevermind.

The Larry Davis Experience 01-07-2005 02:48 PM

Anyone Catch Arnold Last Night?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
1 word - bold
I thought the boldest thing about it was his continued use of the term "special interests" to mean "anyone who doesn't give money to him or his ballot measures."

I'm curious. Do you see his governorship as a success at this point? I don't really see that he's done much, but maybe I'm reading the Chron too much.

The Larry Davis Experience 01-07-2005 02:53 PM

This has to be tough to read in a newspaper article, even one that begins with high praise of you as the likely deputy SecSt:
Quote:

But Zoellick is not a glad-hander, friends and associates said.

During Cabinet meetings, Bush often goes around the table calling on one secretary after another by the snappy nicknames he coins for them. "When he gets to Zoellick, he just says, 'Hello, Zoellick,' " one source said. "It was very clear he didn't have the Texas touch."
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-zoellick7jan07,1,6527556.story?coll=la-news-a_section

I love imagining W doing the Seinfeld "hellooooo Newman" to this guy. Part of me wants to think Bush dislikes him because Zoellick is, you know, capable and book smart, but my sources on Bush's disposition are notably suspect.

Tyrone Slothrop 01-07-2005 03:01 PM

Anyone Catch Arnold Last Night?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by The Larry Davis Experience
I thought the boldest thing about it was his continued use of the term "special interests" to mean "anyone who doesn't give money to him or his ballot measures."

I'm curious. Do you see his governorship as a success at this point? I don't really see that he's done much, but maybe I'm reading the Chron too much.
Club is willing to overlook the continued Gray Davis-like budgetary tricks because Arnold is a Republican and gives a good speech.

Sidd Finch 01-07-2005 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bilmore
Wow. You didn't get it at all. That's sort of surpr . . . .

No, it's not. Nevermind.

Once again, heal thyself. Or at least see the humor in your own contradictions, when you are busy pointing out the humor in someone else's.

sgtclub 01-07-2005 03:27 PM

Anyone Catch Arnold Last Night?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Club is willing to overlook the continued Gray Davis-like budgetary tricks because Arnold is a Republican and gives a good speech.
No, I agree with him when he says that all we've (read he) done so far is stop the bleeding with last years debt restructuring. His proposal is necessary and bold (for a politician), and I actually think it has a good chance of passing, mostly because there is no other politician in the state that has any where near the stature he does.

To Larry, I think he has taken some necessary steps thus far. Too early to say whether his term has been successful.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:44 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com