LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Who will be the first administration official out the door? (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=638)

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 11-09-2004 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I'm a Texas Democrat. Our motto is "well, it could be worse." I wanna see who Ashcroft is replaced by before jumping for joy.
I'd like to see the Dems stay on message this week, with the message being "Ashcroft leaving doesn't change the fundamental antagonism of this administraiton to free speech and civil rights."

SlaveNoMore 11-09-2004 07:52 PM

Nobody even guessed Evans.
 
Quote:

sebastian_dangerfield
"Ill." Thats like "man getting hit with football." It works on so many levels.
It really does:

http://www.brendanloy.com/blog/image...ootball1sm.JPG

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 11-09-2004 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
I'd like to see the Dems stay on message this week, with the message being "Ashcroft leaving doesn't change the fundamental antagonism of this administraiton to free speech and civil rights."
You mean, laying the groundwork for a defeat in 2008?

SlaveNoMore 11-09-2004 07:55 PM

Quote:

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
I'd like to see the Dems stay on message this week, with the message being "Ashcroft leaving doesn't change the fundamental antagonism of this administraiton to free speech and civil rights."
Using the precedent of "pick the loser from a scandal-ridden Midwest Senate race"....

Good god, man. It's Alan Keyes.

Quick - file the secession papers.

ltl/fb 11-09-2004 07:56 PM

Nobody even guessed Evans.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
It really does:

http://www.brendanloy.com/blog/image...ootball1sm.JPG
At least he's not ducking it, like you do with any question that might cause your bizarre worldview to be altered in even the most minute detail.

I personally am not that excited about Ashcroft -- or anyone else in the Admin -- resigning. I think he's only going to appoint more wackily right-wing, don't tax but spend like hell, religious people so it's not a win. If (OK, when) he runs Powell off, there'll be a net loss.

sebastian_dangerfield 11-09-2004 07:56 PM

Nobody even guessed Evans.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
The quote appears in other sources. Maybe "ill" means "So fucked in the head that he thinks crime and terrorism have been defeated on his watch."
No, nobody is that ill. That would be delusional. Acid level delusional.

ltl/fb 11-09-2004 07:57 PM

Nobody even guessed Evans.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
No, nobody is that ill. That would be delusional. Acid level delusional.
Mental illness is an illness.

I'm sure everyone will mostly agree that you can trust me on this.

sebastian_dangerfield 11-09-2004 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Using the precedent of "pick the loser from a scandal-ridden Midwest Senate race"....

Good god, man. It's Alan Keyes.

Quick - file the secession papers.
Not so fast. You voted for these waterheads. If they put Alan in, you have to move to a red state.

sebastian_dangerfield 11-09-2004 07:59 PM

Nobody even guessed Evans.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Mental illness is an illness.

I'm sure everyone will mostly agree that you can trust me on this.
Oh, I do, and I reieterate - nobody is that ill.

SlaveNoMore 11-09-2004 07:59 PM

Nobody even guessed Evans.
 
Quote:

ltl/fb
At least he's not ducking it, like you do with any question that might cause your bizarre worldview to be altered in even the most minute detail.
A) Did you recently post something other than a recipe?

B) I'm not fond of Ashcroft, nor have I read this fucking quote in or out of context.

C) So in answer to your question, My Festive Candied Yam, "I don't give a fuck one way or another"

I hope this proves responsive.

ltl/fb 11-09-2004 08:00 PM

Nobody even guessed Evans.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
[random crap]

I hope this proves responsive.
Not really.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 11-09-2004 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
You mean, laying the groundwork for a defeat in 2008?
I think civil rights and free speech are wedge issues for the Rs - there are Rs who feel strongly on both sides of most issues Ashcroft has spoken on.

SlaveNoMore 11-09-2004 08:01 PM

Quote:

sebastian_dangerfield
You voted for these waterheads.
And you voted for the party of Noam Chomsky and Michael Moore.

Et tu, Raoul?

ltl/fb 11-09-2004 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
I think civil rights and free speech are wedge issues for the Rs - there are Rs who feel strongly on both sides of most issues Ashcroft has spoken on.
You need to say "privacy" and "respect for property rights" not "civil rights" if you want to appeal to Rs.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 11-09-2004 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Using the precedent of "pick the loser from a scandal-ridden Midwest Senate race"....

Good god, man. It's Alan Keyes.

Quick - file the secession papers.
Even I don't think Bush is this stupid.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:42 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com