![]() |
Any Rand and Chuck Schumer
Quote:
Quote:
|
Iraq Invasion Update
Quote:
|
Iraq Invasion Update
Quote:
|
Iraq Invasion Update
Quote:
|
Iraq Invasion Update
Quote:
|
Iraq Invasion Update
Quote:
|
Iraq Invasion Update
Quote:
|
Iraq Invasion Update
Quote:
|
Iraq Invasion Update
Quote:
Hanging Chad and Captain Marvelous seemed to have similar lines of reasoning. Accepting facts that support their position, no matter how aburd, and discounting facts that do not support their position, now matter how valid. Could be the same person. |
Any Rand and Chuck Schumer
Quote:
|
Any Rand and Chuck Schumer
Quote:
|
Iraq Invasion Update
Quote:
|
Guilty,Guilty, Guilty
I fit the profile. I am white and I think both OJ and Michael Jackson were guilty.
Gallup: Public Splits, In 'Major Racial Divide,' on Michael Jackson Verdict By E&P Staff Published: June 14, 2005 11:30 AM ET NEW YORK An overnight Gallup Poll released today shows that 48% of Americans disagree with the verdicts clearing pop star Michael Jackson of all charges in the molesting case and only 34% agree -- and they are split along a “major racial divide,” Gallup said. Whites disagree with the verdict by about 2-1 (54% to 28%) while nonwhites take the opposite view by 2-1 (56% to 26%). This recalls the O.J. Simpson verdict in 1995, when whites disagreed with him getting off by 62% to 27% while nonwhites supported it by 67% to 24%. A clear majority, or 62%, believe that Jackson's celebrity status was a major factor in the verdict. Nearly half said they were “surprised” by the verdict, with 24% saying they were “outraged.” Exactly one in four said they were “still a fan” of the singer. Almost as many said they were once fans, but no longer. |
Guilty,Guilty, Guilty
Quote:
I would not be shocked to learn that Michael Jackson had molested boys. I am shocked, however, that the prosecution chose to hang their hats on this alleged victim and his mother. They were a parody of the gold-digging plaintiffs. Given that this was, apparently, the best the prosecution could do, I would also not be shocked to learn that Michael Jackson had, in fact, never molested boys. The whole "this would be different if he weren't a celebrity" strikes me as, bluntly, a crock of shit. People have a gut feel about the guy because of his persona as a celebrity. No one should go to prison on gut feel. But, I think the prosecution was banking on that, and felt that they could get away with a weak case and weaker star witnesses because of the gut feel. If he weren't a celebrity, I doubt that the case would have been brought on this evidence. I do not doubt that another wealthy defendant, one who was not a celebrity but who, like Jackson, had the means to mount a full defense, would have gotten the same result on the same evidence. In fact, I think it would've been easier for someone who did not bring Jocko's creepiness into the courtroom. As for OJ, that's a different story. The case was stronger (infinitely), and the prosecution just grossly bungled it. The jury lost sight of the important things, but who can blame them? If the prosecution hadn't spent eight months on bullshit (including, if I remember the Bugliosi book correctly, a full day explaining that an indentation on Nicole's back was caused by the clasp of her dress), then they maybe they could have focused the jury's attention on the important stuff -- the DNA evidence. Also, one has to wonder who got the brilliant idea of asking a professional actor (OJ) to do an uncontrolled demonstration (the glove). Stupid, stupid, stupid. OTOH, we got a great Chris Rock bit out of it, so that's something. ("You can't tell me that white people wouldn't wonder, if Jerry Seinfeld was being prosecuted for murder and the one cop who found the glove just happened to be in the Nation of Islam.") |
Any Rand and Chuck Schumer
Quote:
There you go again. [This part is irony -- the literal meaning of my statement is the opposite of the actual meaning intended] If Ralph Nader were made the US Trade Rep, would you just assume that he would radically shift US policy away from free trade? [/This part is irony -- the literal meaning of my statement is the opposite of the actual meaning intended] edited for clarity. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:43 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com