LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Politics: Where we struggle to kneel in the muck. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=630)

Hank Chinaski 10-04-2004 11:36 PM

October Surprise?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
If Kerry was President today - and his French and Russian buddies succeeded in having all the UN sanctions dropped - this very well might have been a possibility.
there have been false starts before, but if this stuff hits- and there is a report coming up later this week- JFK might have to change field again before the next debate. and ss if this proves true, and you don't apologize, I'm telling everyone your real middle name.

http://www.cnsnews.com//ViewSpecialR...20041004a.html

Quote:

Exclusive: Saddam Possessed WMD, Had Extensive Terror Ties
By Scott Wheeler
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
October 04, 2004

(CNSNews.com) - Iraqi intelligence documents, confiscated by U.S. forces and obtained by CNSNews.com, show numerous efforts by Saddam Hussein's regime to work with some of the world's most notorious terror organizations, including al Qaeda, to target Americans. They demonstrate that Saddam's government possessed mustard gas and anthrax, both considered weapons of mass destruction, in the summer of 2000, during the period in which United Nations weapons inspectors were not present in Iraq. And the papers show that Iraq trained dozens of terrorists inside its borders.

One of the Iraqi memos contains an order from Saddam for his intelligence service to support terrorist attacks against Americans in Somalia. The memo was written nine months before U.S. Army Rangers were ambushed in Mogadishu by forces loyal to a warlord with alleged ties to al Qaeda.

Other memos provide a list of terrorist groups with whom Iraq had relationships and considered available for terror operations against the United States.

Among the organizations mentioned are those affiliated with Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Ayman al-Zawahiri, two of the world's most wanted terrorists. Zarqawi is believed responsible for the kidnapping and beheading of several American civilians in Iraq and claimed responsibility for a series of deadly bombings in Iraq Sept. 30. Al-Zawahiri is the top lieutenant of al Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden, allegedly helped plan the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist strikes on the U.S., and is believed to be the voice on an audio tape broadcast by Al-Jazeera television Oct. 1, calling for attacks on U.S. and British interests everywhere.

The source of the documents

A senior government official who is not a political appointee provided CNSNews.com with copies of the 42 pages of Iraqi Intelligence Service documents. The originals, some of which were hand-written and others typed, are in Arabic. CNSNews.com had the papers translated into English by two individuals separately and independent of each other.

There are no hand-writing samples to which the documents can be compared for forensic analysis and authentication. However, three other experts - a former weapons inspector with the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM), a retired CIA counter-terrorism official with vast experience dealing with Iraq, and a former advisor to then-presidential candidate Bill Clinton on Iraq - were asked to analyze the documents. All said they comport with the format, style and content of other Iraqi documents from that era known to be genuine.

Adder 10-04-2004 11:49 PM

Debate Ethics 101
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Bob

More importantly, can the Twinkies defeat the Evil Empire?
Hell yeah.

Adder 10-04-2004 11:56 PM

Bernie Goetz
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
I am prohibited from defending myself and shooting these bastards in the nuts.
Interesting choice of target...

TexLex 10-05-2004 12:07 AM

Gun control (register or don't)
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
An extradordinary percentage of drivers in Houston are armed (see RT's post, supra), but haven't noticed that it makes Houston drivers more polite.
Armed? Yes. Uninsured? Often. Wholly indifferent to the traffic laws? Perhaps. But impolite? I wouldn't go that far.*

-TL


*Well maybe that one guy that shot at me on I-45, but that was ages ago and he's probably dead now.

Say_hello_for_me 10-05-2004 12:18 AM

Gun control (register or don't)
 
Quote:

Originally posted by TexLex
Armed? Yes. Uninsured? Often. Wholly indifferent to the traffic laws? Perhaps. But impolite? I wouldn't go that far (except for that one guy that shot at me on I-45 one time).
Except for the fact that it seems like all y'all Texicans have been shot at on the roads, this is pretty much a perfect description of Chicago. I'd be willing to bet that more than half of the traffic fatalities in Chicago are hit and runs by uninsured drunks/uninsured jagoffs. Not trying to get all racial here, but from my recollection (e.g., of the news reports), it seems like Hispanic children in Hispanic neighborhoods are disproportionately the victims.

The way you guys describe it (and with the Death Penalty issues y'all have... appointed defense lawyers sleeping thru trials) it sounds like Texas is the gun-nut equivalent of the gun-shunning Chicago, with violence running a bit ahead in gun-shunning Chicago. Man, next time I'm thinking of saying criminals are disproportionately Democrats, I'll think of y'all oppressed Texicans and bite my tongue. That is, unless the criminals in Texas are...

Say_hello_for_me 10-05-2004 12:38 AM

Who are the gas tax people?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Interesting proposal going around in Texas that will never see the light of day:

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory...story2/2828417

I think it's an interesting proposal, but privacy concerns are certainly going to have to be taken into consideration. There are some pretty legitimate reasons people wouldn't want the government monitoring their every movement.
A few thoughts. If someone posted image recognition cameras to capture plates on all cars at every entrance and exit of the Dan Ryan and the Eisenhower in Chicago, the stolen car problem would be cut in half in a few days. Specifically, you put in the cameras and run each recognized plate as it enters and exits. I know the software is out there, and I know there is no right to privacy against having your plate imaged and ran, so I just don't know why its not being done. Send out an alert with the plate, the car and the location every time a plate hits in the computer.

As to your topic, there are companies out there that provide all kinds of tracking chips for tracking products. One of the next Big Ideas I've heard discussed is stuff like what IDSY (that's a Nasdaq stock symbol, I forget the company's name) is doing. Basically, put a chip in all the cars and just track when they pass certain points on the highway. That covers highway-trips at least. I'd be veeery interested in doing this to trucks, as loaded trucks should absorb the costs of road-damage on highways at least.

Otherwise, I like the year-end mileage idea with something like an exponential increase in payments by pounds per tire.

I don't think the problem is constitutional here; nor do I think you are suggesting it is. Rather, the issue might be considered political. One, the idea of a tax on something Americans have been trained to love. The second is the privacy concern.

I think the first could be addressed by implementing the tax along with a 1% decrease (or something like that) across the board in income taxes. If somebody just explained that people are being fairly taxed based on how much harm they are causing to the environment and the roads, I suspect 60-75% of Americans would buy-in. And I don't think the privacy issue is all that much a concern, but the G can be held to promises for any tracking system such that the data would not be available for enforcement of traffic or criminal laws.

As for the GPS stuff, the applications have come a long way in just a few years. However, GPS applications require more than just receipt of the synchronized GPS signals by a moving car. They also require something in the car to provide the information to whoever is doing the tracking. In other words (and I'd guess that you and most others here know this), GPS satellites don't track anything. Its the systems that receive the GPS signals that either track, or are used to track, stuff.

Political or Constitutional? I'm guessing no Constitutional concerns, but somebody may have a decent argument here that I haven't heard or considered.

Hello

TexLex 10-05-2004 12:53 AM

Gun control (register or don't)
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
Except for the fact that it seems like all y'all Texicans have been shot at on the roads, this is pretty much a perfect description of Chicago. I'd be willing to bet that more than half of the traffic fatalities in Chicago are hit and runs by uninsured drunks/uninsured jagoffs. Not trying to get all racial here, but from my recollection (e.g., of the news reports), it seems like Hispanic children in Hispanic neighborhoods are disproportionately the victims.

The way you guys describe it (and with the Death Penalty issues y'all have... appointed defense lawyers sleeping thru trials) it sounds like Texas is the gun-nut equivalent of the gun-shunning Chicago, with violence running a bit ahead in gun-shunning Chicago. Man, next time I'm thinking of saying criminals are disproportionately Democrats, I'll think of y'all oppressed Texicans and bite my tongue. That is, unless the criminals in Texas are...
For starters - it's not nice to go and quote me when I'm editing. Secondly, what's with the lame drawl? I don't use one and neither should you. The guy that shot at me obviously had mistaken me for someone else, so I don't really count that as a crime, per se. The guy that came after me with a knife for my parking space is another story, but he wasn't driving a car, so I didn't include him in my review of Texan driver politeness. This is Houston - there's going to be crime. It's a big city. A big stinky city, but that's another issue for another day.

We have no guns in the house. We never will. We try to keep out the conservatives too, but they keep slipping through the sensors. Before moving here, Mr. Lex had a gun permit in Chicago. He does not have one here. Go figure.

sgtclub 10-05-2004 01:29 AM

Gun control (register or don't)
 
Quote:

Originally posted by TexLex
Before moving here, Mr. Lex had a gun permit in Chicago. He does not have one here. Go figure.
Is that a nice way of saying he's pussy-whipped?

Atticus Grinch 10-05-2004 03:08 AM

Gun control (register or don't)
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
I wasn't living in the city at that time. Did he get the gun lawfully?
Dunno, but I'm missing the relevance of that to the question we're discussing, which was "Man with a gun? Call 911!"

The NRA thanks you for your credulous regurgitation of its talking points, though. You are a very good boy.

Atticus Grinch 10-05-2004 03:13 AM

Gun control (register or don't)
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
Y'all just let me know if you have anything you could call insightful to add here. Meantime, about those dead lawyers whose corpses you were humping (as you might put it)?
You, I like. You're like a Club who can play the dozens. You're mirror images --- you're an embattled minority in the City of Broad Shoulders, and Club is an embattled minority in the City of Broad Minds.

Not Me 10-05-2004 03:29 AM

Gun control (register or don't)
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Dunno, but I'm missing the relevance of that to the question we're discussing, which was "Man with a gun? Call 911!"

The NRA thanks you for your credulous regurgitation of its talking points, though. You are a very good boy.
I haven't followed closely enough this exchange because I am swamped with, err, whatever it is that us unemployed types do. Are you talking about Dan White murdering George Moscone and Harvey Milk? If so, yes, Dan White was legally in possession of his gun. He was a former police officer and former firefighter.

I don't have time to google it, but I believe that he got an incredibly light sentence, like only 7 years and I think he was out on parole after serving only 5 years. That is a real problem - light sentences handed out by liberal judges.

He commited suicide a year or so after he was paroled if it is any consolation to those of you who hate guns.

If you are talking about something else, well, sorry, I have been busy, err, collecting my unemployment check.

Not Me 10-05-2004 03:35 AM

Gun control (register or don't)
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Club is an embattled minority in the City of Broad Minds.
More like a City of Closed Minds. Either you spew the politically correct Dem party line in SF, or you are silenced. SF is the paradigm of intolerance and suppression of speech.

Atticus Grinch 10-05-2004 04:03 AM

Oh, the humanity!
 
Rumsfeld questions Saddam-Laden link

Next up, Jesus converts to Islam!

Not Me 10-05-2004 04:11 AM

Oh, the humanity!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Next up, Jesus converts to Islam!
Naw, Jesus was too busy fucking Mary Magdelene (sp?) to bother to read that pedophile Muhammad's book. Unlike filthy Muhammad, Jesus fucked adult women, not children.

Hank Chinaski 10-05-2004 09:16 AM

Media Bias?
 
You know how we keep getting to see funny things Bush says? Well JFK isn't just going to check with France, he's going to bridge our policy to the future- he'll check with space aliens! Unless he means God.....


http://edition.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLIT...bal/index.html

Quote:



"But I can do a better job of protecting America's security because the test that I was talking about was a test of legitimacy, not just in the globe, but elsewhere."
If W had said this, we'd be seeing it on TDS. Ty or SAM would be leading with this morning. CNN would have mentioned it, rather than simply quoting without pointing out how dumb a thing it was to say...

Hank Chinaski 10-05-2004 09:38 AM

I knew Penske, and Hank you are no Penske
 
http://mensnewsdaily.com/images/poli...ons/lapdog.jpg

Say_hello_for_me 10-05-2004 10:30 AM

Gun control (register or don't)
 
Quote:

Originally posted by TexLex
For starters - it's not nice to go and quote me when I'm editing. Secondly, what's with the lame drawl? I don't use one and neither should you. The guy that shot at me obviously had mistaken me for someone else, so I don't really count that as a crime, per se. The guy that came after me with a knife for my parking space is another story, but he wasn't driving a car, so I didn't include him in my review of Texan driver politeness. This is Houston - there's going to be crime. It's a big city. A big stinky city, but that's another issue for another day.

We have no guns in the house. We never will. We try to keep out the conservatives too, but they keep slipping through the sensors. Before moving here, Mr. Lex had a gun permit in Chicago. He does not have one here. Go figure.
In order.
Sorry, didn't mean to interrupt you.
Is the lame drawl at least somewhat distastefule to you and do you have any tips on how I could make it more so?
What's with the big city Crime comment... Boston liberals just priced criminals out of the market.
And I don't have a gun either... and you can't get a gun permit for a handgun anymore in Chicago... and not for at least the last 10 years... not to age Mr. Lex or nuthin.

But hey, I'm just saying. It ain't the legal guns in Houston that give you the highest per-capita homicide rate of any large city in the nation. Because you Texas pretenders don't hold that title, yet. And what position you do hold, you hold thanks to the De(dammit, just bit my tongue).

Hello

Secret_Agent_Man 10-05-2004 10:47 AM

The Silence of the Blogosphere
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
And they admitted their mistake.
I dunno Slave -- "mistakes" like that two days in a row is enough to make you think that Fox might not be an entirely unbiased news organization.

Put that in the context of the recent survey I read about showing that the Fox news stories on Bush were postive/negative at 3/2 in July and August (?) (i.e. about the same rate as the major "liberal" media outlets) -- while the Fox "news stories" on Kerry were 4/1 negative during that same time period (other major networks at about 50/50 IIRC).

Just drop that "we report, you decide" and "fair and balanced" bullshit.


S_A_M

P.S. While you repeat the matra, didn't CBS and Rather own up to the errors and questionable provenance of the documents?

Secret_Agent_Man 10-05-2004 10:53 AM

Slave Lied!!!!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
A bunch of crap showing a remarkable ability to spin material proving you wrong as if it proves you right -- must be studying the Administration's work on Iraq.
But we're the ones who are wrong for saying so.

S_A_M

P.S. Sure you're not really PatentGreedy?

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 10-05-2004 10:54 AM

Oh, the humanity!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Rumsfeld questions Saddam-Laden link

Next up, Jesus converts to Islam!
2:1 odds we see Edwards quote Rumsfeld in tonights' debate.

Now, are the R's waiting for it with a good zinger, or did Rummy mis-speak (contradicting the Pres' debate performance in the process)?

Secret_Agent_Man 10-05-2004 11:17 AM

more polls
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
Is this true? What is the evidence of increased voter registration, other than word of mouth?
You're obviously not listening to NPR, or even reading all the stories on the FNC website.

S_A_M

Secret_Agent_Man 10-05-2004 11:19 AM

more polls
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
So which is it? Are DEM voter rolls up or being surpressed? I'm confused.
Maybe both. Those are not inconsistent, club.

S_A_M

Secret_Agent_Man 10-05-2004 11:31 AM

OR . . Maybe Edwards will Quote Bremer . . .
 
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/...ain/index.html

Headline: " Bremer: 'Not not enough troops' in Iraq after Saddam's ouster"

"(CNN) -- The former U.S. civilian administrator in Iraq says the United States "paid a big price" for not having enough troops on the ground after the overthrow of Saddam Hussein's regime."

S_A_M

P.S. Holy Shit! Who knew? I thought Rumsfeld said we didn't need many actual soldiers.

sgtclub 10-05-2004 11:48 AM

Gun control (register or don't)
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Dunno, but I'm missing the relevance of that to the question we're discussing, which was "Man with a gun? Call 911!"

The NRA thanks you for your credulous regurgitation of its talking points, though. You are a very good boy.
The reason why you don't see the relevance is the same reason why you deserve to be shot.

Say_hello_for_me 10-05-2004 11:50 AM

Gun control (register or don't)
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
You, I like. You're like a Club who can play the dozens. You're mirror images --- you're an embattled minority in the City of Broad Shoulders, and Club is an embattled minority in the City of Broad Minds.
I represent the silent majority in inner-cities and flyover land.

Hello

sgtclub 10-05-2004 11:53 AM

Good Work Building Those Alliances
 
Quote:

Polish President Aleksander Kwasniewski has slammed Dem president hopeful John Kerry for not recognizing Poland's contributions and sacrifice to the war in Iraq.

"It is sad that a senator with 20 years of experience does not recognize Polish contribution. This is immoral," Polish President Aleksander Kwasniewski told FACTS in an interview commenting on the US Presidential Debate.

"It is sad that a senator with 20 years of experience underestimates Polish sacrifice, this is sad."

The Polish President added however that one should consider this was a part of the ongoing electoral campaign.

"I do not think this was out of ignorance," the president emphasized on the TVN Facts.

"There is one thing which should be stated clearly: this coalition is not just the United States, Great Britain, Australia alone; it also involves participation of Polish, Ukrainian, Bulgarian and Spanish soldiers who have died. It is immoral not to recognize the involvement we contributed based on our conviction that there should be unity in fighting terrorism, that there was a need to display international solidarity and that Saddam Hussein was a dangerous individual of this world."

"President Bush acted like a real Texan gentleman, he made sure to show appreciation for other countries' involvement in the coalition," Kwasniewski pointed out.

Secret_Agent_Man 10-05-2004 11:59 AM

Good Work Building Those Alliances
 
Quote:

Club posts:
Kwasniewski bitching about Kerry.
This is the same guy who stated that Bush "sold them a bill of goods" on WMD, and recently said his soldiers would be out before Spring, 2005?

Prickly sort.

S_A_M

taxwonk 10-05-2004 12:02 PM

more polls
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
And don't forget about those 1,000,000 black Democrats that were disenfranchised in 2000.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...3&sid=96378798
Hoping for a repeat?

sebastian_dangerfield 10-05-2004 12:05 PM

October Surprise?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
there have been false starts before, but if this stuff hits- and there is a report coming up later this week- JFK might have to change field again before the next debate. and ss if this proves true, and you don't apologize, I'm telling everyone your real middle name.

http://www.cnsnews.com//ViewSpecialR...20041004a.html
Excellent source. Clearly well vetted. I'm convinced.

SlaveNoMore 10-05-2004 12:06 PM

more polls
 
Quote:

taxwonk
Hoping for a repeat?
Why not? Especially since the Dems will claim it happened anyway.

baltassoc 10-05-2004 12:06 PM

Gun control (register or don't)
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
The reason why you don't see the relevance is the same reason why you deserve to be shot.
One of the problems with the gun control debate is that the people who feel passionately about either side just fundamentally view the world differently from each other, and view the other side as espousing a direct threat to their personal safety.

The NRA slogan "When guns are criminalized, only criminals will have guns" has always struck me as odd, because it could just as easily be a pro gun control slogan, if one goes to a far enough extreme.

sebastian_dangerfield 10-05-2004 12:10 PM

more polls
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
If Kerry was President today - and his French and Russian buddies succeeded in having all the UN sanctions dropped - this very well might have been a possibility.
Well, thats a complete pile of steaming shit straight from Safire's ass, er, I guess they're calling that his mouth these days...

This would be true - oil would be much cheaper.

Replaced_Texan 10-05-2004 12:10 PM

Oh, the humanity!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Rumsfeld questions Saddam-Laden link

Next up, Jesus converts to Islam!
I imgaine Cheney threatened to eat Rumsfeld's young (if he hasn't done so already), because Rummy has backed off on this. Rumsfeld's timing was a bit, er, poor. A cynic might wonder if he was deliberately trying to screw with tonight's debate. http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.j...toryID=6414697

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 10-05-2004 12:15 PM

Good Work Building Those Alliances
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub

President Bush acted like a real Texan gentleman...

Goring the oxy re the moron.

taxwonk 10-05-2004 12:16 PM

Gun control (register or don't)
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
The reason why you don't see the relevance is the same reason why you deserve to be shot.
I don't think Atticus deserves to be shot, but I'm willing to bet the victims don't see the relevance either.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 10-05-2004 12:16 PM

Oh, the humanity!
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
I imgaine Cheney threatened to eat Rumsfeld's young (if he hasn't done so already), because Rummy has backed off on this. Rumsfeld's timing was a bit, er, poor. A cynic might wonder if he was deliberately trying to screw with tonight's debate. http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.j...toryID=6414697
Oh, the image seering into my brain! Damn you RT!

sebastian_dangerfield 10-05-2004 12:16 PM

more polls
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Why not? Especially since the Dems will claim it happened anyway.
Whoever gets elected will be considered illegitimate, which is an updgrade from the more appropriate characterization of "criminally inept" and/or "blindly ideological."

Hank Chinaski 10-05-2004 12:25 PM

Gun control (register or don't)
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
I don't think Atticus deserves to be shot, but I'm willing to bet the victims don't see the relevance either.
The old Taxwonk would have wished him dead. Growth?

Hank Chinaski 10-05-2004 12:28 PM

more polls
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Whoever gets elected will be considered illegitimate,
Idon't know....post debates bush at 321

http://www.electoral-vote.com/oct/oct05.png

and Michigan tied? Unless Bush does something like eat a live rat on TV during one of the next two debates this could get pretty clear cut.

sebastian_dangerfield 10-05-2004 12:37 PM

more polls
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Idon't know....post debates bush at 321

http://www.electoral-vote.com/oct/oct05.png

and Michigan tied? Unless Bush does something like eat a live rat on TV during one of the next two debates this could get pretty clear cut.
I see 154 in red (and thats conceding FL). Where are you getting 321?

PA will go Dem, even if the votes go for the GOP. Whoever colored it pink doesn't know the machine in these parts very well.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:29 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com