LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   The babyjesuschristsuperstar on Board: filling the moral void of Clinton’s legacy (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=719)

ltl/fb 03-31-2006 01:34 PM

In Defense of Club
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
He's not a racist. He's perhaps a bit of a classist, but no more so than many of us here, whether conscious of the fact or not. I can see his point, although I don'tagree that the bill currently under discussion does much of anything to increase the security of our borders.

What Club has failed to address is that the people coming in to the US to do harm come through legal channels. We have done virtually nothing to secure our ports, railroads, and highways. Of course, the main question is how we can secure the ports, etc. without massive infringments on the rights of all the people and property coming through.

It's a Catch-22, and Club's frustration has led him inot a corner he really doesn't belong in.
FWIW, I don't actually think he's as racist as his comments make him sound. And it could be classism -- but I tend to think, and I think RT's statistics back me up, that we need all kinds of classes of immigrants.

And I don't think he's at all articulating what he DOES want the policy to be.

ETA and the thing about "not coming just to make more money" just sounds ludicrous. Does he only want political refugees? I would think we would get very few immigrants from Europe (or, western Europe) if acknowledgement and prostration before the superior governmental system were a prerequisite for immigration.

sgtclub 03-31-2006 02:29 PM

Interesting campaign tactic.......
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
It seems to me that the costs of immigration are factored in without the benefits. I read a study a few weeks ago that stated that 5% of the workforce in the US are undocumented aliens. They're actively contributing to the economy, including paying taxes for the prison system. Aggressively arresting them and their employers, solely because of their undocumented status will have a massive impact on the economy.


That bill in the House wants to arrest of 24% of the people who farm, and probably every single farmer in the United States as well. Has anyone bothered to explain how that work will get done while we're kicking 12 million productive people out of the country? 94% of the undocumented men have jobs.
There is no doubt that most illegals are solidly contributing to our economy and our country in general. But there are studies on both sides of the argument that, as you would expect, reach different conclusions on the cost/benefit analysis.

sgtclub 03-31-2006 02:30 PM

Interesting campaign tactic.......
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
In terms of numbers, can I count you in on raising legal immigration from 1 million to 3 million over the next few years, just because it's the right thing to do? And we'll ask them all their views on the constitution on the way in?
I don't know what the right number is, but I'm in favor of letting in as many as the system can handle.

Replaced_Texan 03-31-2006 02:31 PM

Interesting campaign tactic.......
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
I don't know what the right number is, but I'm in favor of letting in as many as the system can handle.
What system?

sgtclub 03-31-2006 02:31 PM

Interesting campaign tactic.......
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Isn't freedom to work (i.e., make more money) part of our ideals?

I mean this seriously. The ability to make more money -- to work hard, and to keep the fruits of your labor -- is an inherent part of the ideal of freedom.

And even if you could separate the two, I suspect a whole lot more immigrants to the US over the course of history came here for the ability to make more money than did purely for other freedoms.

Sure, there are the Pilgrims, Puritans, and Hugenots, but the belief that America was the "Land of opportunity," with "streets paved with gold" attracted untold numbers.
Agreed, but my admittedly idealistic self would like to think there was more to it than just $$$.

sgtclub 03-31-2006 02:35 PM

In Defense of Club
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
He's not a racist. He's perhaps a bit of a classist, but no more so than many of us here, whether conscious of the fact or not. I can see his point, although I don'tagree that the bill currently under discussion does much of anything to increase the security of our borders.

What Club has failed to address is that the people coming in to the US to do harm come through legal channels. We have done virtually nothing to secure our ports, railroads, and highways. Of course, the main question is how we can secure the ports, etc. without massive infringments on the rights of all the people and property coming through.

It's a Catch-22, and Club's frustration has led him inot a corner he really doesn't belong in.
Thanks Wonk.

I don't think I'm a classist either. I come from modest roots. My great grand parents (who, I will note, came over 150 years after RTs line) came here with nothing but the shirts on their back. Only 1 of my grand parents had a college education. Trust me, I get it.

sgtclub 03-31-2006 02:38 PM

Interesting campaign tactic.......
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
What system?
Our system in this country. Our system that does and will continue to need to educate the children of illegal immigrants. Our system that pays emergency medical costs, pays public assistance, requires driver's licenses and other forms of ID, and on and on.

ltl/fb 03-31-2006 02:45 PM

Interesting campaign tactic.......
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
Our system in this country. Our system that does and will continue to need to educate the children of illegal immigrants. Our system that pays emergency medical costs, pays public assistance, requires driver's licenses and other forms of ID, and on and on.
Can you provide a cite for illegal aliens getting public assistance? I didn't think they could. Also, is there a federally based (not state-by-state) right to public education for people in the country illegally? I'm not sure on that one. Emergency medical, also not sure on, but I can see where people would get that.

ETA on the public education thing, please differentiate, as necessary, between education for children who came here illegally and education for children who were born here to parents who are not here legally. This may necessitate a discussion of whether there should be a birthright citizenship rule thingy.

Gracias!

sgtclub 03-31-2006 02:55 PM

Interesting campaign tactic.......
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Can you provide a cite for illegal aliens getting public assistance? I didn't think they could. Also, is there a federally based (not state-by-state) right to public education for people in the country illegally? I'm not sure on that one. Emergency medical, also not sure on, but I can see where people would get that.
Follow the conversation you dolt. We are talking about how much the system can handle. That assumes they would legally be here in the first place.

Sidd Finch 03-31-2006 02:56 PM

Interesting campaign tactic.......
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Gattigap
"34. What do you think of the works of Francis Fukuyama?

(a) Great American Writer
(b) Best American Writer

35. Same question, but as applied to the works of Charles Krauthammer."
As twenty random immigrants the following:

"Did you come to America for freedom of religion, freedom of speech, or because you believed you could make a better living for yourself and your family?"

My guess is you'll get the "better living" response at least 15 times. Feel free to start with my parents -- as minimally devout Roman Catholics in Italy they didn't have much issue with freedom of religion, and they don't seem to care too strongly about freedom of speech, but they sure as hell liked being able to feed their kids and put us thru school.

ltl/fb 03-31-2006 02:58 PM

Interesting campaign tactic.......
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
Follow the conversation you dolt. We are talking about how much the system can handle. That assumes they would legally be here in the first place.
The name-calling is charming. Thanks for the clarification.

baltassoc 03-31-2006 03:03 PM

In other news...
 
There's a very entertaining article on the front page of today's WSJ outlining how the Abramoff scandal broke.

I think there is a lesson here for us all: if you are at the center of a giant scheme to barter political influence for huge sums of cash, do not dump your fiancee for a 24 year old waitress a month before the wedding.

Replaced_Texan 03-31-2006 03:04 PM

Interesting campaign tactic.......
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Can you provide a cite for illegal aliens getting public assistance? I didn't think they could. Also, is there a federally based (not state-by-state) right to public education for people in the country illegally? I'm not sure on that one. Emergency medical, also not sure on, but I can see where people would get that.
Well, with EMTALA, anyone who shows up in an ER should be evaluated and stabilized, no matter ability to pay or status. So there are costs associated with that (though, in assessing those costs, there should be an analysis of the taxes that undocumented aliens are paying). (Note: the board of the Harris County Hospital District threatened to quit in 2000 when it was suggested that the District stop treating illegal immigrants.)

As for the children of undocumented aliens, if they're born in the United States, they're United States citizens, and regardless of their parents' status, we do have an obligation to educate them. According to the Pew Hispanic Center, there are 3.1 million of them. The question is what to do about the 1.8 million kids who are unauthorized. Again, their parents are likely paying property and sales taxes, which often go towards school finance.

This is probably a good report to read to better understand the population that we're talking about. I think that these are the statistics that have club so worried:
Characteristics of Unauthorized
• Who Are They?
-- Mainly in Families
-- Relatively Young
-- Almost All Work
• What Are They Like?
-- Low Education
-- Low Income
-- High Poverty
-- Lack of Insurance

I did find it interesting that 25% of undocumented aliens had some college background. I would have thought it much less.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 03-31-2006 03:07 PM

In other news...
 
Quote:

Originally posted by baltassoc
There's a very entertaining article on the front page of today's WSJ outlining how the Abramoff scandal broke.

I think there is a lesson here for us all: if you are at the center of a giant scheme to barter political influence for huge sums of cash, do not dump your fiancee for a 24 year old waitress a month before the wedding.
A propos of ethics reform, I think Congress should take a page from Nigeria:

Soccer refs should take bribes but remain neutral.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 03-31-2006 03:10 PM

Interesting campaign tactic.......
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
As twenty random immigrants the following:

"Did you come to America for freedom of religion, freedom of speech, or because you believed you could make a better living for yourself and your family?"

My guess is you'll get the "better living" response at least 15 times. Feel free to start with my parents -- as minimally devout Roman Catholics in Italy they didn't have much issue with freedom of religion, and they don't seem to care too strongly about freedom of speech, but they sure as hell liked being able to feed their kids and put us thru school.
Maybe. Unless you were asking Russian Jews, who have come to the country in great numbers. Or Cubans. Or the very large number of immigrants who come because they are married to a US citizen (or the child of one) - who presumably would want an option that they came for love.

Then again, if you asked our former au pair why she's still in the country, she'd tell you it's the Malls. They don't have Malls like ours in France.

Club, should we kick her out? She's here for the Malls, and except for the Malls (and the movies), probably isn't overly excited about American culture, history, or principals.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:22 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com