| robustpuppy |
05-13-2003 07:35 PM |
They actually need to ban this?
Quote:
Originally posted by Bad_Rich_Chic
Yeah, but are we (or by proxy mainstream American middle-to-upper-middle-class culture) really the applicable cultural or larger social group? It could very well be the specific sub-culture. Not in all circumstances, but it surely is in some.
Then again, I'm on record thinking that real social mobility in the US is more of a myth than is generally believed.
|
Right -- I am referring to acceptance by the larger group. But as you suggest, surely these folks don't give a jack what a bunch of vain self-important over-educated under-stimulated lawyers who waste colossal amounts of time on chat boards think about their splitcocks and forked tongues, and aren't likely even to seek employment in places run by the likes of us.
However, my guess is that most extreme self-mutilators grew up in households where people looked "normal," so they did not develop the aesthetic as children, as the adults in the National Geographic spreads probably did. So for most people, it must be rebellion rather than acceptance that motivates, at least initially, and then acceptance is found in the sub-group, which acceptance might motivate more mutilation/adornment.
|