![]() |
Coen Brothers
Quote:
|
No more buffy
[QUOTE]Originally posted by fufu
Quote:
I thought that given the season, it was a very well done episode. Any television show that ends with a rejection of the patriarchical paradigm and can make me laugh and cry at the same time does a good job. I have lots of thoughts on the episode, but they're posted elsewhere. SPOILER Lots of theories. The most prelavent out there right now is that the whole Sanshu prophecy about the vamprie with a soul earning redemption and becoming human applies to Spike, not Angel. Certainly all of the relevant points point to Spike, especially the playing a major role in the Apocolypse and their not being sure which side he'd be on. Also, someone mentioned that Spike's dream from last night "drowning in shoes" could be a reference to LA. In the very first episode of the series, Cordelia said something about being envious of Buffy for living in LA and being so close to that many shoes. Could be that he comes back to take on the role that Cordelia abandoned, since presumably he has it good with the Powers that Be these days. He may not be a vampire with a soul. He may be like Lilah. Maybe he had a contract with W&H back in the day, though he strikes me as a "doesn't play well with others" type. |
The Practice
Quote:
|
Coen Brothers
Quote:
O Brother certainly fit within that tradition in ways Fargo did not. |
The Practice
Quote:
Jimmy, Eugene, Cammryn Mannheim. And the blonde Harvard girl. The coup de grace was switching to monday. It will be on Sunday again this Fall. Kelley's problem is that it's a character-driven show, unlike law and order, so switching the players a lot won't really help things. But who cares? Alias, and Jennifer Garner, is still smokin' |
AI finale and Question probably only Less can answer
Quote:
Question: have the bookmakers posted odds for this contest? If so, what are they? If Ruben wins, I will be shocked and awed. |
AI finale and Question probably only Less can answer
Quote:
Ruben: 4/5 Clay: Even |
Outdated Humor
Quote:
2) Everyone's criminal client is innocent. Good god. How often does a defendant fess up, even to his lawyer? 3) Sure it sucks, but more than biglaw? Screaming isn't unique to O'Donnell & Young. Besides, Jimmy the Grunt isn't an equity partners. They cut him out (well, didn't cut him in) in some episode, no? And, the mouthy secretary is all too true to life. Hey, not every firm can be like girls club, with hot, perky lawbabes running around everywhere. Firms like that are cancelled, er, go out of business, pretty quickly. The real question is how they make money. 80% of their cases are appointed somehow, which doesn't pay big bucks. They never seem to have a big payout, and they hardly have steady clients (other than the repeat murderers, including Bobby's wife). |
Outdated Humor
Quote:
|
Coen Brothers
Quote:
|
Actor Scott Bairstow charged with child rape
EVERETT — Scott Hamilton Bairstow, a television and movie actor who formerly lived in Mukilteo, has been charged with having sex in 1998 with a then-12-year-old relative of his wife. Bairstow, a native of Winnipeg, Manitoba, has appeared in nine feature films, including “Tuck Everlasting” and “New Best Friend.” His television roles included appearances in “Touched by an Angel,” “Party of Five,” “Wolf Lake” and “Lonesome Dove: The Series.”
Child rape |
Bairstow-mers; gangbusters, whatever
ewww. That almost as disgusting as Penske's slow-loading, self-outing web page or Slave's dating tips
|
Top Cult Movies
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Outdated Humor
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
*This is before she announced, in soap opera fashion, that she secretly WAS an attorney and had kept her law schooling and bar exam completely hidden from them. No effort was ever made to explain how she took the bar without doing a background check that would involve contacting her present employer. I keep waiting for the episode where she announces that she is Bobby and Lindsay's daughter and see how they would explain that she was born before they met. |
AI finale and Question probably only Less can answer
Quote:
I guess I would like Ruben better if I were a little more tone-deaf. Unfortunately for me, I have perfect pitch (well, almost--I have to think for a few seconds before singing a given note; my violin teacher automatically knew what notes her cats were meowing). I don't even like it when the performers sing in a different key from the popular version, let alone off key. YMMV. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:56 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com