| 
		
			| baltassoc | 03-10-2004 04:12 PM |  
 bertuzzi
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by spookyfish
 From what Gwinky says, fighting is within the rules of the game, at least tacitly.  I assume if seen, cheap shots aren't -- i.e. they are given a penalty.
 
 |  Actually, this applies the standard wrong.  Cheap shots are  within the rules of the game, because  there is a penalty (that falls short of expulsion from the game).  It's like in basketball: fouls are "prohibited," but that can't be that bad, because everyone is allowed to have five per game.  Even sucker punching someone is within the bounds of most popular American team sports, even when fighting is not permitted, because the sport deals with it as a game infraction.
 
It's when something truly goes beyond the bounds of the game that the torts / criminal law comes in.  Here, I think there is a good argument that the combination of the cheap shot and the body slam went beyond that which is permitted tacitly.
 
ET apologize for sounding like I was lecturing to a bunch of 1Ls; I've been doing that too much lately IRL. |