LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   All Hank, all the time. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=734)

Sidd Finch 07-28-2006 02:55 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Gattigap
See, you're getting all defensive and shit, when all I'm saying is that to "destroy" an organization like Hezbollah as you've advocated will require far, far more than the "Untouchables" strategy that Israel has deployed so far. Implicitly, I'm guessing this is your plan. Yes?
Not working for the Israeli military, I don't have a "plan." Nor do I think that this is solely an Israeli concern. Do you?

Sidd Finch 07-28-2006 02:57 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. The more I look at problems like Israel, Iraq, Rwanda, Darfur, etc., the more I find myself thinking that Imperialism, for all the problems it created, may be the only solution.

Apparently, I'm not alone in this. Google Niall Ferguson. I don't agree with everything the man says by a long shot, but he does utter some of the same foul truths I've been saying.

Genocide by white people is better?

Adder 07-28-2006 03:11 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
You're right. Israel should just keep giving up territory and apologizing for letting its towns get in the way of those rockets. Eventually, I'm sure that doing this enough times will convince Hezbollah that Israel deserves to exist.

Why did you take Gattigap's post as sarcastic? How does Israel "destroy" Hezbollah without, at minimum, doing what he said?

Spanky 07-28-2006 03:14 PM

Well you asked for a discussion
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub [list]1. Nice fences do not stop missiles, rockets, and mortars.
I don't think anyone could disagree with that


Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
2. Complete removal of Israeli forces and Jewish settlers from an area does not achieve anything positive, but merely signals Israeli weakness, inviting escalated terror and aggression from Israel’s enemies.
It is true that dismantling the settlements does not accomplish anything positive for Israel. However, it might accomplish something positive for the settlers. Settlements in Palestinian majority areas are about the dumbest idea of all time. If you are going to make the West Bank part of Israel expel all the Palestinians and make it Israeli. But to put a bunch of Jewish settlements in the midst of a bunch of Palestinians has got to be one of the dumbest ideas of all time. It is a half ass measured that exposes a lot of Israelis to danger and accomplishes nothing (except angering the Palestinians even more).



Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
3. Hezbollah and Hamas cannot be defeated with air strikes. There is no effective alternative to ground invasion and ongoing control of the ground.
True


Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
4. Unless the Israeli military controls the ground on the other side of fences, those fences achieve nothing.
Probably true


Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
5. Goodwill gestures by Israel tend to increase terror and invite further demands.
I would phrase it that goodwill gestures do nothing because the ultimate goal of all these people is the destruction of Israel.


Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
6. Goodwill gestures by Israel never produce moderation of Arab goals and demands, but rather produce the opposite.
True. See above


Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
7. Terror is not caused by settlements, but rather fueled by the removal of settlements.
Terror would exist without the settlements. Whether they are there or not, there will still be terrorism. All the settlements do is expose a lot of Israelis to danger and they accomplish nothing.

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
8. Terror is not caused by Israeli military occupation, but rather allowed to flourish with the removal of Israeli military occupation.
The terrorism will exist as long as Israel exists. The occupation doesn't really affect it either way.


Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
9. It is impossible for there to be two sovereign entities between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean.
I agree


Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
10. No matter how many concessions Israel makes, the world will always justify Arab terrorism, because there is always one more capitulation that Israel has failed to make (e.g., giving up the “Shebaa Farm” on the Golan Heights).
True


Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
11. No matter how nice Israel is to Israeli Arabs, no matter how many affirmative-action programs it implements, it will always be accused of being an “apartheid regime.”
True. That is because in many ways Israel is acting like an apartheid regime. As long as Palestinians from Israel proper are not allowed to return to their homeland, and any Jew in the world can immigrate to Israel, Israel is implementing apartheid like policy (and definitely a racist policy). However, such racist and apartheid like policies are necessary if Israel is going to continue to exist.


Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
12. Much of the Israeli far Left is essentially an anti-Semitic movement that seeks Israel’s destruction and automatically endorses the enemies of Israel in all things.
This seems like B.S. but I don't know enough to comment


Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
13. The Israeli Labor party and its Kadima cousin may be more effective at fighting terror, once they decide to do so, than Likud. The reason is that if Likud were fighting terror, the Israeli Left would take to the streets in mass demonstrations against Israeli imperialism and aggression, and the leftist Israeli media would declare that 400,000 protesters turned out.
This makes sense.


Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
14. The Israeli Left will oppose every conceivable act of Israeli self-defense, other than total capitulation.
If they are like our left - probably


Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
15. Jewish far-leftism is a very real enemy of Israel.
True


Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
16. Some international observers don’t mind seeing Jewish civilians murdered by terrorists, and will applaud and justify all such murders as comeuppances for the Jews’ being so insensitive.
These people do not think that Israel has a right to exist.


Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
17. Israeli niceness and flexibility often encourage and embolden anti-Semites.
True

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
18. Israel-bashing is often driven by anti-Semitism, and many Israel-bashers are increasingly open about their delight at seeing Jewish civilians murdered.
True


Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
19. Israeli pursuit of the “peace process” has triggered a worldwide storm of anti-Semitism.
Not true - this doesn't make any sense. I don't think people will hate Jews any more because Israel is pursuing the peace process. I do think the creation of Israel has created a great deal more anti-Semitism than existed before.


Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
20. Terrorists cannot be appeased.
True

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
21. Arab terrorists do not morph into statesmen.
Usually true

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
22. Looking for Palestinian moderates in politics is a fruitless endeavor.
True

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
23. Many Israel-bashers do not care about dead Arab civilians, other than as a useful bludgeon with which to de-legitimize Israel.
True

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
24. Much of the Western Left would celebrate the destruction of Israel.
True

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
25. The vast majority of Israeli Arabs want to see Israel destroyed and the Jews thrown into the sea.
True - but why would you expect any "Israeli" Arabs to support the existence of Israel?

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
26. There are hundreds of Jewish professors in Israel who serve as an academic fifth column for terrorism and will do almost anything to collaborate with the enemies of their country.
If Israel is like America, this is true.

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
27. The Arabs will not accept an independent Israel in any set of borders, no matter how small. Thus nothing can be achieved by reducing Israel’s territory, other than signaling weakness and vulnerability.
True.

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
28. Much of the Western media believes that there are no problems on earth that could not be greatly ameliorated by destroying Israel.
I don't think most of the Western Media focuses on Israel that much.

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
29. Most of the governments of Europe seem not to believe Jews should be allowed to defend themselves from aggression.
True

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
30. The only country on earth that is expected to respond to the mass murder of its civilians by turning the other cheek is Israel. The only country on earth that has spent many years trying to defeat terrorism by turning the other cheek is Israel.
They expect America to do the same

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
31. Whenever Israel responds firmly to aggression and terrorism, it will always be criticized for a “disproportionate” response.
True

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
32. Most of those who claim that anti-Zionism is different from anti-Semitism are anti-Semites.
If that were true then I am an Anti-Semite, and I don't think I am (because I believe there is a difference between Anti-Zionism and Anti-Semitism). Support of (or a lack of support of) Israel is a very different issue from anti-Semitism. Sometimes they are related but often they are not. I would say that Zionism has caused a great deal of anti-Semitism throughout the world.

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub 33. The only people on earth whom the Left believes should be denied the right to self-determination and self-defense are the Jews.
Maybe

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub 34. “Palestinians” are not a people and never were. They are simply Arabs who happened to migrate into historic Western Palestine. They have no right to statehood.
B.S. They are a people. They lived in that area for Generations. They are as attached to that land as the Normans are to Normandy. Just because the Normans are also French does not mean they also don't have a right to Normandy or can be moved to another part of France.

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
35. The Golan Heights are not “Syrian” and never were.
B.S. The Golan Heights were part of Syria and Israel took the Heights away.

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
36. Noam Chomsky and Norman Finkelstein are anti-Semites, and so are many of their supporters.
I don't know if this is true. I can't stand Noam Chomsky and many of his opinions but I have no idea if he is anti-Semitic.

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
37. Israeli politicians are among the stupidest on earth.
I really doubt this. I would say that they have one of the toughest jobs on earth.

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
38. Israeli leftists never learn from the failures of their policies and “ideas.” Every failure is explained away by the fact that their policies were not applied thoroughly enough.
Just like the American left, so probably true.


Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
39. The moral and legal responsibility for every single Arab civilian death or injury in the Middle East conflict rests squarely upon the shoulders of the aggressive Arab fascists and terrorists who have provoked Israel.
This is ridiculous. Does anyone disagree that this is ridiculous.

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
40. There is no moral or legal reason for Israel to refrain from attacking terrorists and murderers when they hide among civilians.
Way overstated. I agree that it is sometimes necessary to kill civilians when terrorists are hiding among them, but the statement above is way to sweeping to be accurate.

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
41. Many of the “anarchists” and others who protest against Israel’s security wall want the wall removed because they want terrorists to murder Jewish civilians.
True

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
42. Palestinians are the Sudeten Germans of the Middle East.
I don't even know what this means. I think it was wrong for Stalin to expel the Sudeten Germans from the Sudetenland after WWII. However, the Sudeten Germans were part of a country that had committed unspeakable crimes, so some could make the argument that they had it coming. I don't think there is anyway to argue that the Palestinians deserved to lose their land.

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
43. Israel has no obligation to share its water resources with the “Palestinians” or anyone else.
True

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
44. There are no non-military solutions to the problem of terrorism.
Probably true. But in this case there are probably no military solutions

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
45. Talk of “peace” is revealing, because it is only necessary to consider making peace when you are faced with an enemy. Israel is faced with a host of committed enemies, and it is they who will not accept a fair peace settlement.
The use of the term "fair" here is ridiculous. What has happened to the Palestinians is unfair no matter how you slice it. There can be no "fair" solution to this problem.

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
46. There are no significant differences between the agenda of the PLO and the agenda of Hamas and Hezbollah.
True - they all want to destroy Israel.

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
47. The Middle East conflict is not a marital spat. Going through the pretense of holding hands and holding talks does not calm tensions and achieves nothing.
True

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
48. One cannot make peace by pretending that war does not exist.
True

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
49. One cannot buy off anti-Semites and Islamofascists with trade concessions and subsidies.
True. However, I would put it like, you are never going to get people to accept (or believe or agree that it was justified) the loss of their homeland through trade concession etc.

Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
50. The only way to stop terrorism is to kill terrorists.
The only thing that will stop terrorism is time (and that may not work either). Killing Terrorists is not going to stop terrorists because there will always be someone to take the dead terrorists place. You simply need to accept that terrorism will continue and be prepared for it.

Adder 07-28-2006 03:24 PM

Well you asked for a discussion
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky

The only thing that will stop terrorism is time (and that may not work either). Killing Terrorists is not going to stop terrorists because there will always be someone to take the dead terrorists place. You simply need to accept that terrorism will continue and be prepared for it.
I was all set to mock you for attempting to take that load of crap on point by point, but, by pure accident, happened to read this last part, which ruined all my fun.

Spanky 07-28-2006 03:26 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. The more I look at problems like Israel, Iraq, Rwanda, Darfur, etc., the more I find myself thinking that Imperialism, for all the problems it created, may be the only solution.
It will totally screw up the balance of the board if you go from being one of the most liberal members to its most conservative. Take back what you said.

futbol fan 07-28-2006 03:27 PM

Well you asked for a discussion
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Adder
I was all set to mock you for attempting to take that load of crap on point by point, but, by pure accident, happened to read this last part, which ruined all my fun.
It was very considerate of him to put it at the end instead of in the middle of that post, which is a part of the internet I will never read.

futbol fan 07-28-2006 03:29 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
It will totally screw up the balance of the board if you go from being one of the most liberal members to its most conservative. Take back what you said.
I thought everyone would be excited by the fact that Wonk finally dropped the mask of compassion to reveal the slavering fascist that you just know all of us elitist, condescending, uber-PC liberals have lurking inside. Way to go, Wonk.

Spanky 07-28-2006 03:29 PM

Well you asked for a discussion
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Adder
I was all set to mock you for attempting to take that load of crap on point by point, but, by pure accident, happened to read this last part, which ruined all my fun.
You should read the rest of it. Everyone will disagree (probably violently) with at least one of my opinions. Should be fun.

Gattigap 07-28-2006 03:29 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Not working for the Israeli military, I don't have a "plan." Nor do I think that this is solely an Israeli concern. Do you?
Not solely, no. I do think that Hezbollah in particular is special to Israel, though. They're camped out across the border, have dug more warrens than a pack of rabbits, and like tossing missles into Northern Israel.

That's unacceptable, of course, and Israel needs to do something, and I don't pretend to know what the optimal solution is. I do see, though, that the slogging is much tougher than Israel anticipated, and I suspect that another long term war and occuption, while maybe necessary here, is not at all what Israel had in mind.

Similar deal with Iraq. Declaring that organizations must be "destroyed" led us to the shit that we're in now in Iraq, and it leads us to the rationale where we have to invade and indefinitely occupy every potential terrorist threat on the planet.

Spanky 07-28-2006 03:32 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
I thought everyone would be excited by the fact that Wonk finally dropped the mask of compassion to reveal the slavering fascist that you just know all of us elitist, condescending, uber-PC liberals have lurking inside. Way to go, Wonk.
I just finished "Fever Pitch" by Nick Hornby. Less loaned me his copy. Did you read it? Did you like it?

Sidd Finch 07-28-2006 03:34 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Gattigap
Not solely, no. I do think that Hezbollah in particular is special to Israel, though. They're camped out across the border, have dug more warrens than a pack of rabbits, and like tossing missles into Northern Israel.

That's unacceptable, of course, and Israel needs to do something, and I don't pretend to know what the optimal solution is. I do see, though, that the slogging is much tougher than Israel anticipated, and I suspect that another long term war and occuption, while maybe necessary here, is not at all what Israel had in mind.

Similar deal with Iraq. Declaring that organizations must be "destroyed" led us to the shit that we're in now in Iraq, and it leads us to the rationale where we have to invade and indefinitely occupy every potential terrorist threat on the planet.
What organization were we trying to destroy in Iraq?


Hezbollah as a military entity must be destroyed. Should Israel do this through a house-to-house war? No. The cost would be too high. And I don't think destroying Hezbollah as a military entity means killing every last soldier or blowing up every last tunnel (not that I wouldn't applaud that occurrence.)

But I do not see this as solely an Israeli problem or obligation. Security council resolution and all that.

Hamas is a terror organization. Hezbollah is an army. There is a very important difference.

futbol fan 07-28-2006 03:37 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
I just finished "Fever Pitch" by Nick Hornby. Less loaned me his copy. Did you read it? Did you like it?
It's very good. I read it when I knew almost nothing about the game and it was still a great story. Don't be put off by the stupid hollywood movie they tried to make out of it (the Red Sox for fuck's sake). I highly recommend it.

ETA: duh. You read it already.

Gattigap 07-28-2006 03:41 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
What organization were we trying to destroy in Iraq?
The Terrorist Menace. Duh.

Quote:

Hezbollah as a military entity must be destroyed. Should Israel do this through a house-to-house war? No. The cost would be too high. And I don't think destroying Hezbollah as a military entity means killing every last soldier or blowing up every last tunnel (not that I wouldn't applaud that occurrence.)
Here, you and I agree. But I think that Hezbollah appears to be very well entrenched, willing to fight hard, drawing sympathy from the Arab governments that initially condemned their actions, and uninterested in diplomatic solutions where they lay down their arms like Sinn Fein. I'm not seeing that kind of intermediate solution at the moment.

Quote:

But I do not see this as solely an Israeli problem or obligation. Security council resolution and all that.
Nor do I.

taxwonk 07-28-2006 03:45 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Genocide by white people is better?
Not genocide. Restoring order. Just like what Israel is doing in Lebanon, but on a global scale. The idea is to stop the terror and the genocide. Then spend the time and the resources to build infrastructure, institutions, establish markets.

If we're really going to stop the genocide and the terrorism, then we have to be prepared to go all the way. Applying band-aids to those wounds we find it politically expedient to treat is like trying to stop the heroin trade one street dealer at a time.

Hank Chinaski 07-28-2006 03:48 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Gattigap
Here, you and I agree. But I think that Hezbollah appears to be very well entrenched, willing to fight hard, drawing sympathy from the Arab governments that initially condemned their actions, and uninterested in diplomatic solutions where they lay down their arms like Sinn Fein. I'm not seeing that kind of intermediate solution at the moment.
I'm sorry, you believe Northern Ireland achieved an "imediate solution?"

Gattigap 07-28-2006 03:49 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I'm sorry, you believe Northern Ireland achieved an "imediate solution?"
No, which is why I said they achieved an "intermediate" solution.

You know, somewhere in between nuking Belfast, and surrendering the entire island.

futbol fan 07-28-2006 03:50 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I'm sorry, you believe Northern Ireland achieved an "imediate solution?"
Whenever I get down on myself for not being able to read, or spell, you almost immediately make me feel better. I know it's not really appropriate for a Friday, but thanks.

taxwonk 07-28-2006 03:50 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
It will totally screw up the balance of the board if you go from being one of the most liberal members to its most conservative. Take back what you said.
I'm actually being the ultimate liberal. We need a government so big it runs the whole world, because the people everywhere are too venial and stupid and bloodthirsty to run themselves.

Hank Chinaski 07-28-2006 03:56 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
Whenever I get down on myself for not being able to read, or spell, you almost immediately make me feel better. I know it's not really appropriate for a Friday, but thanks.
You know my ancestors, the Italians, had their home in Ireland and the UK, before you lot took it. You fuckers are living on my birth right, and mucking it all up growing potatos instead of spaghetti plants or grape vines.

futbol fan 07-28-2006 04:01 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
You know my ancestors, the Italians, had their home in Ireland and the UK, before you lot took it. You fuckers are living on my birth right, and mucking it all up growing potatos instead of spaghetti plants or grape vines.
Show me where it says that in the Bible. Otherwise, we have nothing to talk about.

taxwonk 07-28-2006 04:02 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
You know my ancestors, the Italians, had their home in Ireland and the UK, before you lot took it. You fuckers are living on my birth right, and mucking it all up growing potatos instead of spaghetti plants or grape vines.
Maybe you'd have been able to hold on to it if you hadn't been so busy killing Christ.

Sidd Finch 07-28-2006 04:09 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
Not genocide. Restoring order. Just like what Israel is doing in Lebanon, but on a global scale. The idea is to stop the terror and the genocide. Then spend the time and the resources to build infrastructure, institutions, establish markets.

If we're really going to stop the genocide and the terrorism, then we have to be prepared to go all the way. Applying band-aids to those wounds we find it politically expedient to treat is like trying to stop the heroin trade one street dealer at a time.

I s'pose my view of imperialism is more negative than yours. I see it tending more towards genocide than order.

A very orderly genocide, but still.

Spanky 07-28-2006 04:14 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
It's very good. I read it when I knew almost nothing about the game and it was still a great story. Don't be put off by the stupid hollywood movie they tried to make out of it (the Red Sox for fuck's sake). I highly recommend it.

ETA: duh. You read it already.
I have never heard of the movie. Who was in it?

Adder 07-28-2006 04:22 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Gattigap
Here, you and I agree. But I think that Hezbollah appears to be very well entrenched, willing to fight hard, drawing sympathy from the Arab governments that initially condemned their actions, and uninterested in diplomatic solutions where they lay down their arms like Sinn Fein.
You do realize that there was 25 year period where you could have said the things about the modern IRA?

futbol fan 07-28-2006 04:27 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
I have never heard of the movie. Who was in it?
Are you for real? Go to google and type "fever pitch." Seriously.

There was a UK version as well, which was miles better but still crap compared to the book.

Gattigap 07-28-2006 04:29 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Adder
You do realize that there was 25 year period where you could have said the things about the modern IRA?
Yeah. So?

Hank Chinaski 07-28-2006 04:30 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
Are you for real? Go to google and type "fever pitch." Seriously.

There was a UK version as well, which was miles better but still crap compared to the book.
I think you'd get dirty pictures if you do that. try imdb.

futbol fan 07-28-2006 04:35 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Adder
You do realize that there was 25 year period where you could have said the things about the modern IRA?
But what kind of songs does Hezbollah have? The IRA always had some very good songs.

Hank Chinaski 07-28-2006 04:37 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
But what kind of songs does Hezbollah have? The IRA always had some very good songs.
the "passed out drunk half the time" thing also provided safe time so the housewives could get their shopping done safely.

Spanky 07-28-2006 04:38 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
Are you for real? Go to google and type "fever pitch." Seriously.

There was a UK version as well, which was miles better but still crap compared to the book.
OH MY GOD: The Jimmy Fallon - Drew Barrymore movie about basefall!!!!. I had forgotten the name - obviously I never saw it but remember the ads for it. But it was an autobiography. How do you take an autobiography written by a crazed English soccer fan and turn it into a fictional account of a guy who is into a baseball team in the states?

In any event I don't see how the humor could be translated into a movie unless the movie was narrated. Its the guys observations that made it funny.

Have you read "How to Be Good". That was the first book (and only other book) I have read by Horby, but it was really good. Really funny.

futbol fan 07-28-2006 04:41 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
OH MY GOD: The Jimmy Fallon - Drew Barrymore movie about basefall!!!!. I had forgotten the name - obviously I never saw it but remember the ads for it. But it was an autobiography. How do you take an autobiography written by a crazed English soccer fan and turn it into a fictional account of a guy who is into a baseball team in the states?

In any event I don't see how the humor could be translated into a movie unless the movie was narrated. Its the guys observations that made it funny.

Have you read "How to Be Good". That was the first book (and only other book) I have read by Horby, but it was really good. Really funny.
I didn't read that one, but "High Fidelity" was good, as was the movie, which I did see (and if you haven't you should) and "About A Boy" was also good.

Tyrone Slothrop 07-28-2006 04:47 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
So we should not have destroyed the Nazis because they enjoyed the support of a lot of Germans?
In what sense did we "destroy" the Nazis?

Quote:

Seriously... Hezbollah is a military force. So long as it remains one, it has no legitimacy as a political party. Zero. If they disarm, then they regain legitimacy -- but there seems to be no desire to do that.
In the military sense, we can destroy them. But Hezbollah will still exist. And I think you and I are using the word "legitimacy" in different ways, too. This conversation may be more about the ambiguity of language than about substantive differences in what Hezbollah deserves.

Tyrone Slothrop 07-28-2006 04:48 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
I don't have a clue what the US needs to do in Baghdad. It's too late to hit the rewind button and not start the fucking Bush fiasco in the first place.
2.

Tyrone Slothrop 07-28-2006 04:49 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk Google Niall Ferguson. I don't agree with everything the man says by a long shot, but he does utter some of the same foul truths I've been saying.
You think Great Britain should have stayed out of WWI and let Germany win?

Tyrone Slothrop 07-28-2006 04:51 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
I just finished "Fever Pitch" by Nick Hornby. Less loaned me his copy. Did you read it? Did you like it?
How about that -- me too.

taxwonk 07-28-2006 04:54 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
I s'pose my view of imperialism is more negative than yours. I see it tending more towards genocide than order.

A very orderly genocide, but still.
Then explain how you reconcile that with an Israeli invasion of Lebanon in order to root out Hezbollah.

taxwonk 07-28-2006 05:02 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
You think Great Britain should have stayed out of WWI and let Germany win?
Nope. I was thinking more of his books Collossus and Empire. Like I said, I don't agree with everything he writes.

What's more, while I may believe that it would take an Imperial America to solve some of the world's more intractable problems, it doesn't necessarily mean I advocate actually doing it. It presents all manner of moral, political, financial, and logistical nightmares. On the other hand, I also don't believe that we are ever going to get out of Iraq with a measure of long-term success, nor is Israel ever going to see true long-term peace, without it.

Quite the paradox, no?

Sidd Finch 07-28-2006 05:07 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
Then explain how you reconcile that with an Israeli invasion of Lebanon in order to root out Hezbollah.
You think Israel is trying to do to the Lebanese what, say, we did to the Apache?

Tyrone Slothrop 07-28-2006 05:19 PM

Discuss
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
You think Israel is trying to do to the Lebanese what, say, we did to the Apache?
Smallpox? Blankets of mass destruction?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com