LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Offering constructive criticism to the social cripples in our midst since early 2005. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=681)

AliHajiSheik 07-05-2005 04:14 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
The one that makes it illegal to out CIA operatives.
I'm too lazy to look it up, but its somewhere in this thread. I posted its text last week. Someone quite plainly violated it.

Hank Chinaski 07-05-2005 04:14 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Bush might time his Supreme Court nomination to overshadow the story (as he seems to be doing already, since he promised a nomination within days last week, but now - following the Post story about the Rove link - he is saying he won't offer one until next week), and he will try to link the two matters, so that he can make the defense that any investigation stemming from the Rove debacle is part of a Democratic plot to fuck with his nomination or revenge against a nomination of a conservative.

He'll also be able to use the nomination as an excuse to not discuss the Rove debacle. He'll say something like "I have much to accomplish, and am too busy to be bogged down in the poilitics of personal destruction."

But if its Rove, this story ain't going to disappear, no matter how hard Roger Ailes tries to deep six it. The Wash Post, Newsweek and Vanity Fair, not the Times, are leading the charge on this one. The Post desperately wants to get Watergate II, particularly since it got scooped on Deep Throat. If bush is smart, he'll try to cozy up to Woodward and offer him exclusives early... a make a friend of the imminent enemy defense. Woodward has questionable ethics and has already written a glowing kiss ass book about Bush's reaction to 9/11. Maybe they can buy off Woodward and the Post... maybe not. But either way, they have to deal with Newsweek, which wants Bush's head at the moment, due to the Koran story whipping his admin gave it...
The problem, son, is that all your media amounts to 1 pebble of credibility. Vanity fair? A year ago it was publishing stories about how Bush stole Fla in 2000. do you think anyone cares at all about its "scoops?"

CBS news and Newsweek lies have ruined any abiltity by the media to do anything to Bush. He could start lynching guys on the white house lawn he finds disloyal. Press can't touch him.

sgtclub 07-05-2005 04:14 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
The one that makes it illegal to out CIA operatives.
It is not as simple as that, when you look at the statute. There is temporal element (I think the outee must have been working undercover during the prior 5 years) and there is an knowledge element. Based on what we knew when this was originally argued here, it is an uphill battle for those going after the leaker from a legal standpoint. That's not to say they won't try and it's not to say that they won't bog down DC for the next 3 years, but ultimately, I'd be surprised if there's a conviction.

Hank Chinaski 07-05-2005 04:16 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
The one that makes it illegal to out CIA operatives.
You work for atemp lawyer services firm, Quit trying to make it look like you're hooked into the spy game.

sebastian_dangerfield 07-05-2005 04:22 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
I'm not a Whhabi, but the argument was that there was no violation of the statute. Please let me know if, based on new facts, you believe a statute has been violated.
Technical defense = admission in the court of public opinion. All anyone will hear is "Outed... spy... put her... in danger." That he didn't do so "knowingly," which will be his defense, is a trivial distinction to the public.

Ask anyone whether Michael Jackson's a child molester. "Of course he is." The GOP is already fracturing. People like McCain and Hagel might think its easier to get nominated by distancing themselves from, and attacking, Bush. If a few start tacking toward the center and trying to position themselves as moderate GOP candidates in 2008, Bush could be looking at a nasty mutiny. He can't fight back if the public views his most trusted advisor as a treacherous liar. This could turn Bush into a target.

At a minimum, Bush's teflon will be severely compromised.

But fuck it... he was a lame duck from any angle. The Dems have been killing his agenda for months now with their hands tied behind their backs. His legacy will be a couple supreme court justices and being ahead of the curve on a SS policy which will be implemented years after he's dead.

Oh, and he'll have Iraq. Whatever that becomes.

Sidd Finch 07-05-2005 04:24 PM

the Clintons
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Why? I am not saying that they did it.

You are constantly saying that they did it.


Quote:

I'm saying its not impossible. To date, in my thirty some odd years on earth, to my knowledge there are exactly 0 incidents of circumstantial evidence or inuendo relating me to murder. The Clintons have scores of incidents.
And you believe that the innuendo is true. That's all I'm saying. You believe it's true, whatever your reasons. It's not a shtick, as Hank says in trying to defend you. It's what you truly believe.

If you don't, you would say so. But you can't.



Quote:

Looking at them critically, they have a lot of scandal attached to them. Some with cause, some probably without. Isn't odd that many of the other people with first hand knowledge of the facts are dead, not from old age or in many cases from chronic disease? Again, I am not saying that proves anything; however compare with someone else with like inuendo, let's say, John Gotti.

Isn't it odd that, despite the most expensive criminal investigation in the history of mankind, no one has come up with enough evidence to support a charge against them -- even though the jurisdictions in which they supposedly committed their crimes, according to the right-wing psycho-babble, are largely controlled by Republicans.

Compare that to John Gotti -- enough evidence to support charges and convictions.


Quote:

Neighbour hits and kills his son, next day neighbour vanishes. Do you think he fled to the Bahamas to hide out? Same difference. What I don't get is why otherwise intelligent people are so quick to jump on these hucksters bandwagon.
The nature of the people making the charges would be reason enough. You, for example, have already compared Bill Clinton to Stalin and Mussolini -- and that's just today. Given that, I wouldn't believe you if you told me the sun rises in the East. One believes the pathologic at one's own risk.

Sidd Finch 07-05-2005 04:27 PM

Mourning the Farce of July -- Iraq & Amerika: http://www.bushflash.com/pax.html
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Where they coordinated out of Iraq?

Your point -- I thought -- was that you haven't seen the terror network for which Iraq is now a training ground (and recruitment poster) funcitioning outside Iraq in two years.

Madrid seems to contradict you. The people who are sending foreign fighters to Iraq coordinated the Madrid attack -- don't you think?

Sidd Finch 07-05-2005 04:29 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
I'm not a Whhabi, but the argument was that there was no violation of the statute. Please let me know if, based on new facts, you believe a statute has been violated.

I believed that based on the old facts. Go back and read the thread if you like.

Sidd Finch 07-05-2005 04:30 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
The problem, son, is that all your media amounts to 1 pebble of credibility. Vanity fair? A year ago it was publishing stories about how Bush stole Fla in 2000. do you think anyone cares at all about its "scoops?"

CBS news and Newsweek lies have ruined any abiltity by the media to do anything to Bush. He could start lynching guys on the white house lawn he finds disloyal. Press can't touch him.

Thanks for reminding me -- in addition to yelling "9/11!!!", the Wahhabi Repubs will blame the media.

sebastian_dangerfield 07-05-2005 04:31 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
The problem, son, is that all your media amounts to 1 pebble of credibility. Vanity fair? A year ago it was publishing stories about how Bush stole Fla in 2000. do you think anyone cares at all about its "scoops?"

CBS news and Newsweek lies have ruined any abiltity by the media to do anything to Bush. He could start lynching guys on the white house lawn he finds disloyal. Press can't touch him.
Hank, the CBS News "scandal" was media navel gazing at its worst. No one paid attention to that story except the media, which likes to write stories about itself.

Karl Rove being shitcanned is a big goddamned story. As big as they get. And whether Rove violated the statute or not, if he is the source, he will be fired. Bush has no choice. He's got to kill Rove and quickly, to put the thing behind him.

Shape Shifter 07-05-2005 04:31 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
You work for atemp lawyer services firm, Quit trying to make it look like you're hooked into the spy game.
But I enjoy using the hip, hypertechnical, supersecret spy lingo-type stuff. The chicks dig it.

Spanky 07-05-2005 04:34 PM

Mourning the Farce of July -- Iraq & Amerika: http://www.bushflash.com/pax.html
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Your point -- I thought -- was that you haven't seen the terror network for which Iraq is now a training ground (and recruitment poster) funcitioning outside Iraq in two years.

Madrid seems to contradict you. The people who are sending foreign fighters to Iraq coordinated the Madrid attack -- don't you think?
My point was the Iraqi "breeding ground" has not produced any terrorist attacks outside of Iraq that I know of. Madrid was not caused by terrotists "trainded in Iraq". I have yet to hear of an attack that was coordinated by terroists from Iraq or trained in Iraq. So this breeding ground of terrorist claim rings a little hollow.

Hank Chinaski 07-05-2005 04:36 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Thanks for reminding me -- in addition to yelling "9/11!!!", the Wahhabi Repubs will blame the media.
Isn't calling people you think crazy "wahabi" racist?

Spanky 07-05-2005 04:37 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Isn't calling people you think crazy "wahabi" racist?
No but it is religious bigotry

Hank Chinaski 07-05-2005 04:37 PM

Mourning the Farce of July -- Iraq & Amerika: http://www.bushflash.com/pax.html
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
My point was the Iraqi "breeding ground" has not produced any terrorist attacks outside of Iraq that I know of. Madrid was not caused by terrotists "trainded in Iraq". I have yet to hear of an attack that was coordinated by terroists from Iraq or trained in Iraq. So this breeding ground of terrorist claim rings a little hollow.
2. plus most of the attacks in Iraq are suicide bombers. Sorry, but having the opportunity to do a suicide bombing does not prep you for more.

Shape Shifter 07-05-2005 04:37 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
That is actually a good point. I stand corrected. I change my mind. If it is true there will be hell to pay.
Please remember, too, that Plame's bailiwick was WMD interdiction in the ME. While W & Co were pushing the case in war, supposedly to control WMD, they outed a CIA WMD operative just to score some cheap and largely inconsequential political points. Regardless of whether or not Rove (or whomever) is found guilty, this is despicable behavior.

AliHajiSheik 07-05-2005 04:48 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
No but it is religious bigotry
Maybe Sid hates Shriners?
http://www.seshrine.org/images/offjayroetgerald.jpg

Or a particular breed of Basset hound?
http://www.traffordphotos.com/assets...s/9M69D-11.jpg

Replaced_Texan 07-05-2005 04:50 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Diane_Keaton
I'd have to say that a man, based on political agenda, outing a woman as a CIA Agent and putting her and her children in harm's way after she has dedicated/risked her life to working for the people of the United States of America, would be far worse than Watergate in the public's mind. If Rove did it, Bush is so going to be toast.
If it was Karl Rove, I'd like to know why a political advisor would have access to that kind of information. I don't think he was made Deputy Chief of Staff until fairly recently.

Replaced_Texan 07-05-2005 04:57 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
It is not as simple as that, when you look at the statute. There is temporal element (I think the outee must have been working undercover during the prior 5 years) and there is an knowledge element. Based on what we knew when this was originally argued here, it is an uphill battle for those going after the leaker from a legal standpoint. That's not to say they won't try and it's not to say that they won't bog down DC for the next 3 years, but ultimately, I'd be surprised if there's a conviction.
If Whitewater taught us anything, it's that you don't need to be aiming for a conviction to get a good scandal going that can ruin lots of people.

ETA, plus, I'm pretty sure that if it's Rove, you guys will finally get your beloved perjury conviction. He's been before that Grand Jury a few times.

Sidd Finch 07-05-2005 05:00 PM

Mourning the Farce of July -- Iraq & Amerika: http://www.bushflash.com/pax.html
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
My point was the Iraqi "breeding ground" has not produced any terrorist attacks outside of Iraq that I know of. Madrid was not caused by terrotists "trainded in Iraq". I have yet to hear of an attack that was coordinated by terroists from Iraq or trained in Iraq. So this breeding ground of terrorist claim rings a little hollow.

Thanks for clarifying your point. As far as I know the terrorists who bombed the train Madrid were not trained in Iraq. But who knows? I doubt that they were coordinated from Iraq -- I think they were coordinated from whereever many of the attacks in Iraq are coordinated from. Like a cave in Pakistan.

But really -- suggesting that this makes the "breeding ground" claim hollow? It took quite a few years before people trained in Afghanistan began attacking the US or Russia elsewhere.

And it's not like they don't have an abundance of American targets in Iraq. I don't understand why supporters of the war think American deaths don't "count" if they aren't being killed on US soil. When we invaded Iraq, did anyone anticipate 1500 American soldiers being killed by terrorists?

Sidd Finch 07-05-2005 05:02 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Isn't calling people you think crazy "wahabi" racist?

No. Wahhabi is a particular brand of a particular religion.

It's like calling someone "fundamentalist," only much more so.

And I don't only use it for people who I think are crazy. I use it for people who I think are fundamentalist, with a "those who are against me are evil and must die!!!" edge.

Sidd Finch 07-05-2005 05:03 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
No but it is religious bigotry

Nope, it's not that either.

Unless you are saying that we should embrace the Wahhabis, of course.


"Wahhabi" does not equal "Islam"

Sidd Finch 07-05-2005 05:04 PM

Mourning the Farce of July -- Iraq & Amerika: http://www.bushflash.com/pax.html
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Sorry, but having the opportunity to do a suicide bombing does not prep you for more.

You have a point there, I must admit.

But doesn't someone usually plan suicide bombings? At least those that are effective?

(Are the attacks on US troops suicide bombings? I thought they were mostly RPGs and roadside bombs.)

Penske_Account 07-05-2005 05:08 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sgtclub
I'm not a Whhabi, but the argument was that there was no violation of the statute. Please let me know if, based on new facts, you believe a statute has been violated.
I will stipulate to being a Wasabi Republican. I am not sure what a Wahhabi Republican is, so no comment there.

Penske_Account 07-05-2005 05:10 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
The problem, son, is that all your media amounts to 1 pebble of credibility. Vanity fair? A year ago it was publishing stories about how Bush stole Fla in 2000. do you think anyone cares at all about its "scoops?"

CBS news and Newsweek lies have ruined any abiltity by the media to do anything to Bush. He could start lynching guys on the white house lawn he finds disloyal. Press can't touch him.
I think Jayson Blair is covering the story for the NYTimes. The liberals' paper of record.

sebastian_dangerfield 07-05-2005 05:11 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
ETA, plus, I'm pretty sure that if it's Rove, you guys will finally get your beloved perjury conviction. He's been before that Grand Jury a few times.
That proves its not Rove. He'd never put his ass on the line like that. He'd be giving up a defensible disclosure charge for an indefensible perjury charge. Rove would never do something that stupid. Trust his fate to Time and the NYTimes? Nah, if he's been before the GJ, he isn't the leak.

Spanky 07-05-2005 05:12 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Nope, it's not that either.

Unless you are saying that we should embrace the Wahhabis, of course.


"Wahhabi" does not equal "Islam"
Yes - it is that. Wahhabism is a sect of Islam, just like Congretionalists are a sect of Christianity. So denigrating them is religious bigotry. But then again, so is denigrating Scientologists, or our Hale Bop friends. But it is not a problem for me because I will openly admist that I have some religious bigotries.

Spanky 07-05-2005 05:13 PM

Mourning the Farce of July -- Iraq & Amerika: http://www.bushflash.com/pax.html
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
You have a point there, I must admit.

But doesn't someone usually plan suicide bombings? At least those that are effective?

(Are the attacks on US troops suicide bombings? I thought they were mostly RPGs and roadside bombs.)
I believe the vast majority of recent deaths have been caused by suicide bombers.

Gattigap 07-05-2005 05:16 PM

Mourning the Farce of July -- Iraq & Amerika: http://www.bushflash.com/pax.html
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
I believe the vast majority of recent deaths have been caused by suicide bombers.
Are you suggesting that US forces in Iraq are facing a horde of individually motivated, self taught suicide bombers whose placing and timing are only seemingly coordinated?

sgtclub 07-05-2005 05:17 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Technical defense = admission in the court of public opinion. All anyone will hear is "Outed... spy... put her... in danger." That he didn't do so "knowingly," which will be his defense, is a trivial distinction to the public.
That's not the only defence. Although we don't know for sure, it is very possible that Plame doesn't fall under a class protected by the statute because she hasn't worked undercover outside the US during the last 5 years. But I agree with you, if it gets to this, the jig is up.

Spanky 07-05-2005 05:26 PM

Mourning the Farce of July -- Iraq & Amerika: http://www.bushflash.com/pax.html
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Gattigap
Are you suggesting that US forces in Iraq are facing a horde of individually motivated, self taught suicide bombers whose placing and timing are only seemingly coordinated?
NO - I just stated a fact. Sidd thought that most of the deaths were not caused by suicide bombers. I corrected that. It is not that complicated.

Spanky 07-05-2005 05:31 PM

Mourning the Farce of July -- Iraq & Amerika: http://www.bushflash.com/pax.html
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Thanks for clarifying your point. As far as I know the terrorists who bombed the train Madrid were not trained in Iraq. But who knows? I doubt that they were coordinated from Iraq -- I think they were coordinated from whereever many of the attacks in Iraq are coordinated from. Like a cave in Pakistan.

But really -- suggesting that this makes the "breeding ground" claim hollow? It took quite a few years before people trained in Afghanistan began attacking the US or Russia elsewhere.

And it's not like they don't have an abundance of American targets in Iraq. I don't understand why supporters of the war think American deaths don't "count" if they aren't being killed on US soil. When we invaded Iraq, did anyone anticipate 1500 American soldiers being killed by terrorists?
The argument has been that the war in Iraq was going to lead to more terrorist attacks against American citizens around the world. This has not happened. As far American deaths in Iraq, the prediction was the original invasion was going to cost thousands of deaths. The original invasion went much better than anticipated and the occupation has been more difficult than anticipated. But for being in a war for over two years, the casuality count is very low.

futbol fan 07-05-2005 05:32 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Wahhabism is a sect of Islam, just like Congretionalists are a sect of Christianity. So denigrating them is religious bigotry.
So "snake-handling wingnuts" is out, then?

Penske_Account 07-05-2005 05:36 PM

the Clintons
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
You are constantly saying that they did it.

No, I am just saying I am not convinced it is impossible. By comparison, as far as I can tell, Gore has never killed anyone or been the least bit complicit in a murder; although for alll I know he may have bored someone to death watching him on TV and they attributed it to natural causes.


Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
And you believe that the innuendo is true. That's all I'm saying. You believe it's true, whatever your reasons. It's not a shtick, as Hank says in trying to defend you. It's what you truly believe.
No, I just don't believe that all of it is false out of hand. But you can believe what obsessively paranoidal defamatory delusions about me as you will.

Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch

Compare that to John Gotti -- enough evidence to support charges and convictions.

Not on the case cited.


Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch


The nature of the people making the charges would be reason enough. You, for example, have already compared Bill Clinton to Stalin and Mussolini -- and that's just today.

Actually, I think Hillary is the driving force behind the criminal enterprise; but Hitlerian than Stalinistic or Mussoliniish.

http://www.strangepolitics.com/images/content/12930.jpg

Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Given that, I wouldn't believe you if you told me the sun rises in the East. One believes the pathologic at one's own risk.
More slander. The Clintonistic politics of personal destruction has begun.

Penske_Account 07-05-2005 05:38 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
No but it is religious bigotry
2.

Penske_Account 07-05-2005 05:40 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
No. Wahhabi is a particular brand of a particular religion.

It's like calling someone "fundamentalist," only much more so.

And I don't only use it for people who I think are crazy. I use it for people who I think are fundamentalist, with a "those who are against me are evil and must die!!!" edge.
So in others it is okay to denigrate the fundamentalists? Good, this is why the dems will keep losing the WhiteHouse.

futbol fan 07-05-2005 05:40 PM

the Clintons
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
http://www.strangepolitics.com/images/content/12930.jpg
I know the oft-quoted rule about mentioning Hitler, but how many internet arguments does one lose by actually posting a picture?

Shape Shifter 07-05-2005 05:41 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
So "snake-handling wingnuts" is out, then?
Ahem.

Hank Chinaski 07-05-2005 05:41 PM

CIA Officer Leak
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
So "snake-handling wingnuts" is out, then?
Geez. someone get Ironhead a playbook.

SHW is okay, and listen now, because you'd only be making fun of White Christians- that's always okay. I thought Sidd might have been insulting some Islamic sect, which would not have been okay.

The rules are pretty simple, but you do have to rememebr the basic one above.

Penske_Account 07-05-2005 05:41 PM

Mourning the Farce of July -- Iraq & Amerika: http://www.bushflash.com/pax.html
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
I believe the vast majority of recent deaths have been caused by suicide bombers.
Correction, homicide bombers.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:45 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com