LawTalkers
Page 66 of 126 « First 16566465 66 676876116 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Meet your new thread, same as the old thread. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=781)

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 08-28-2007 04:05 PM
The Emporer is Jerking Off to Boy's Life
 
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Actually, sir, there are conservatives aplenty who actually believe that we should not out hypocrites. They say that the fixation on the policymaker is a Liberal trick used to get around the unassailably moral policies of the GOP. And they actually argue that every time we show the Emporer to be not only naked, but masturbating to gay porn, we undermine the Republic, which is made of policies, which are bigger than the flawed people who support them.

Stated otherwise, we should not expect people to practice what they preach. This argument has been flogged all over National review and by that little scumbag Bill Kristol.

At its core its an argument that the populous is too stupid to think for itself and needs to be lead and we shouldn't shoot out the Republic's weakest supports - the policymakers.

I love Buckley, and I agree the average American is an imbecile, but even I can't get behind that sort of imperial thinking.

And of course, that horseshit doesn't stand up the two word retort - "Clinton Impeachment."
But, wait, the Dems are all traitors, so different standards should apply, no?

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 08-28-2007 04:08 PM
Interesting Letter and response
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I find the notion that this was the "number one sentiment" expressed after 9/11 to be unsurpassingly bizarre. I personally don't know anyone who thinks that.
We all know that Saddam Hussein was responsible for 9/11.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-28-2007 04:08 PM
Interesting Letter and response
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
On the first sentence, I don't think we here have enough information to judge, and wouldn't use that term in any event. Surely that is a subject open to debate.
The number one problem is the lack of reconciliation between Sunnis, Shias and Kurds, and the associated non-viability of the Iraqi state. The presence of Al Qaeda is a sideshow, albeit an aggravating one. Al Qaeda is trying to take advantage of the larger problem. And the Administration is occasionally happy to take advantage of Al Qaeda's presence, to solve political problems.

sebastian_dangerfield 08-28-2007 05:44 PM
Interesting Letter and response
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
The number one problem is the lack of reconciliation between Sunnis, Shias and Kurds, and the associated non-viability of the Iraqi state. The presence of Al Qaeda is a sideshow, albeit an aggravating one. Al Qaeda is trying to take advantage of the larger problem. And the Administration is occasionally happy to take advantage of Al Qaeda's presence, to solve political problems.
Way to kill the board there, Ty.

SlaveNoMore 08-28-2007 05:51 PM
Interesting Letter and response
 
Quote:
Tyrone Slothrop
The number one problem is the lack of reconciliation between Sunnis, Shias and Kurds, and the associated non-viability of the Iraqi state. The presence of Al Qaeda is a sideshow, albeit an aggravating one. Al Qaeda is trying to take advantage of the larger problem. And the Administration is occasionally happy to take advantage of Al Qaeda's presence, to solve political problems.
So are you instead advocating that we either kill them all (or let themselves kill each other off) and then repopulate the region with Americans?

Because I just read this theory somewhere else.

Hank Chinaski 08-28-2007 06:01 PM
They had me at "barbershop quartet."
 
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
In order:

1. And if he were a Dem the GOP wouldn't?

2. They're not. Not at all. What they are is people outing a hypocrite. You seem to think, or are trying to persuade people that, outing a person as a hypocrite is somehow hypocritical, or akin to outing someone as a homosexual. Neither is true.

3. Pass.
if you were truly a champion of gay rights, you would be bothered that he got arrested at all. say if, before you got married, you were in the Minneapolis airport, you saw a really hot woman, and maybe she liked you, you said "hey let's go behind that ticket booth over there and get busy- kill 5 minutes" You should be arrested? how is it different? the proposed sex was homo so he should get arrested? Sup Ct. said that don't go.

And I don't have a problem with the story being published, I just am curious if the tone of the posts here don't imply that the fact he might be gay is the underlying joke. If these guys have some other motivation, they should proceed. I'm just trying to keep it clean in case ncs' friends ever do stop to read here.

Spanky 08-28-2007 06:07 PM
Interesting Letter and response
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
The idea that Al Qaeda is our big problem in Iraq is moronic. As is the notion that there are many people in the United States who want to abandon Israel in the hopes that Islamists will then leave us alone.
As this Lieutenant Colonel is the literally there on the ground facing the enemy, and you receive your information concerning that enemy from thousands of miles away from second hand sources that is filtered through a biased press or from left leaning blogs written in the US by people who don’t seem to care much for actual facts, your criticisms of his statements seem a little ripe.

Having said that, I am questioning my own judgement because I find those Geico commercials really funny.

Hank Chinaski 08-28-2007 06:07 PM
The Emporer is Jerking Off to Boy's Life
 
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Actually, sir, there are conservatives aplenty who actually believe that we should not out hypocrites. They say that the fixation on the policymaker is a Liberal trick used to get around the unassailably moral policies of the GOP. And they actually argue that every time we show the Emporer to be not only naked, but masturbating to gay porn, we undermine the Republic, which is made of policies, which are bigger than the flawed people who support them.

Stated otherwise, we should not expect people to practice what they preach. This argument has been flogged all over National review and by that little scumbag Bill Kristol.

At its core its an argument that the populous is too stupid to think for itself and needs to be lead and we shouldn't shoot out the Republic's weakest supports - the policymakers.

I love Buckley, and I agree the average American is an imbecile, but even I can't get behind that sort of imperial thinking.

And of course, that horseshit doesn't stand up the two word retort - "Clinton Impeachment."
ummm, are you aware of an Oregon Senator the Dems ran out because of simply making suggestive comments (allegedly) to an intern? Are you aware that the only proof the Dems had to run him off was his diary that showed when he was younger he actually had sex with an intern? Do you know at all of hisotry? Clinton's impeachment was simply the crows coming home to roost.

Hank Chinaski 08-28-2007 06:09 PM
Interesting Letter and response
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
As this Lieutenant Colonel is the literally there on the ground facing the enemy, and you receive your information concerning that enemy from thousands of miles away from second hand sources that is filtered through a biased press or from left leaning blogs written in the US by people who don’t seem to care much for actual facts, your criticisms of his statements seem a little ripe.

Having said that, I am questioning my own judgement because I find those Geico commercials really funny.
If you question the validity of Ty's blogs, well sir, I say you are questioning the very underpinnings of this board. And I for one will not listen to those who question this board's underpinning while using it to express those views. Harumpfff

Spanky 08-28-2007 06:09 PM
They had me at "barbershop quartet."
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
That's a good question.
2.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-28-2007 06:10 PM
Interesting Letter and response
 
Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
So are you instead advocating that we either kill them all (or let themselves kill each other off) and then repopulate the region with Americans?

Because I just read this theory somewhere else.
You read some interesting stuff.

Spanky 08-28-2007 06:11 PM
Gee, another Clinton money scandal is a'brewin
 
Quote:
Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Big Source of Clinton's Cash Is an Unlikely Address
Family's Donations Closely Track Those Of Top Fund-Raiser
By BRODY MULLINS
WSJ August 28, 2007; Page A3

DALY CITY, Calif. -- One of the biggest sources of political donations to Hillary Rodham Clinton is a tiny, lime-green bungalow that lies under the flight path from San Francisco International Airport. blaugh, blaugh blaugh, Paw children have donated the maximum $4,600 to Mrs. Clinton's presidential campaign.
Regardless, Hillary Clinton is going to be our next president.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 08-28-2007 06:11 PM
They had me at "barbershop quartet."
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
if you were truly a champion of gay rights, you would be bothered that he got arrested at all.
Why? There's two, separate intertwined issues here. First, he was arrested for disorderly conduct. Doesn't really matter whether it was gay or straight, although it happens that pick-ups in the men's room tend to be gay. If the cops had reports of sex going on behind the ticket counter, and investigated, and sebby was rolling there with the gate agent, why shouldn't he be arrested. It's sex in a public place.*

Second, there's the problem of a staunch gay-right opponent turning out to be gay. We've been over that ground before, but hte issue is the same.


*To be fair, there seems to be a decent argument that sticking your hand under a toilet, even if it's a sign for "wanna fuck", falls short of disorderly conduct sufficient to warrant an arrest. If sebby went up to an undercover cop and said "wanna fuck?" would that be disorderly?

Tyrone Slothrop 08-28-2007 06:12 PM
They had me at "barbershop quartet."
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
if you were truly a champion of gay rights, you would be bothered that he got arrested at all. say if, before you got married, you were in the Minneapolis airport, you saw a really hot woman, and maybe she liked you, you said "hey let's go behind that ticket booth over there and get busy- kill 5 minutes" You should be arrested? how is it different? the proposed sex was homo so he should get arrested? Sup Ct. said that don't go.
I don't understand why the police in the Minneapolis airport are arresting people for what he did. It doesn't strike me as a crime, and you would think they could find something better to do.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-28-2007 06:14 PM
Interesting Letter and response
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
As this Lieutenant Colonel is the literally there on the ground facing the enemy, and you receive your information concerning that enemy from thousands of miles away from second hand sources that is filtered through a biased press or from left leaning blogs written in the US by people who don’t seem to care much for actual facts, your criticisms of his statements seem a little ripe.
Do you really think that Al Qaeda is the biggest problem we face in Iraq?

Spanky 08-28-2007 06:15 PM
Interesting Letter and response
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I find the notion that this was the "number one sentiment" expressed after 9/11 to be unsurpassingly bizarre. I personally don't know anyone who thinks that.
I have friends that are Jewish that think this.

Spanky 08-28-2007 06:19 PM
They had me at "barbershop quartet."
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I don't understand why the police in the Minneapolis airport are arresting people for what he did. It doesn't strike me as a crime, and you would think they could find something better to do.
2.2.2.2.

It is totally bizarre. I don't see a crime either. If he was looking to nail him for solicitation, he didn't even get close to the evidence needed. If homosexuality (Sodomy) is still a crime in this state, he still didn't even get close to establishing any sort of sodomy occurred or a solicitation for sodomy (if such a crime exists). .

Hank Chinaski 08-28-2007 06:21 PM
They had me at "barbershop quartet."
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Why? There's two, separate intertwined issues here. First, he was arrested for disorderly conduct. Doesn't really matter whether it was gay or straight, although it happens that pick-ups in the men's room tend to be gay. If the cops had reports of sex going on behind the ticket counter, and investigated, and sebby was rolling there with the gate agent, why shouldn't he be arrested. It's sex in a public place.*

Second, there's the problem of a staunch gay-right opponent turning out to be gay. We've been over that ground before, but hte issue is the same.


*To be fair, there seems to be a decent argument that sticking your hand under a toilet, even if it's a sign for "wanna fuck", falls short of disorderly conduct sufficient to warrant an arrest. If sebby went up to an undercover cop and said "wanna fuck?" would that be disorderly?
whoa. wait a minute here, Atticus said he was playing footsie, GGG implies he asked for road head, and I gave him that- but no said there was any rolling around going on, I took it he simply asked the wrong guy and got turned in.

Spanky 08-28-2007 06:21 PM
Interesting Letter and response
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Do you really think that Al Qaeda is the biggest problem we face in Iraq?
Yes. The worst consquence for our failure in Iraq for US national security would be an Al Queda base in Iraq (or in a Sunni piece of Iraq).

ltl/fb 08-28-2007 06:31 PM
They had me at "barbershop quartet."
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
whoa. wait a minute here, Atticus said he was playing footsie, GGG implies he asked for road head, and I gave him that- but no said there was any rolling around going on, I took it he simply asked the wrong guy and got turned in.
From the NYT:

"By Roll Call’s account, the officer said Mr. Craig had tapped his foot, in what the officer called a known signal to engage in lewd conduct, and had also brushed his foot against the investigator’s and waved his hand under the stall divider several times before the officer showed him his badge. After the arrest the senator denied any sexual intent, and in a statement issued Monday afternoon he attributed the matter to a misunderstanding."

Apparently there had been complaints about sexual activity in the bathrooms in question. I have no clue where the line is on where you can arrest someone. This seems stupid, considering what construction workers (or whatever) do w/r/t lewd gestures. I guess that doesn't actually ever result in sexual activity, though.


ETA from yahoo (or AP or Reuters): "Craig, 62, has faced rumors about his sexuality since the 1980s, but allegations that he had engaged in gay sex have never been substantiated. Craig has denied the assertions, which he calls ridiculous."

It doesn't seem like there are any allegations that airport security or the city police or whatever were trying to frame him/targeting him, so I am kind of intrigued. But, whatever. I don't think that voting against gay marriage is a sign that one is virulently anti-gay.

ltl/fb 08-28-2007 06:35 PM
Interesting Letter and response
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Yes. The worst consquence for our failure in Iraq for US national security would be an Al Queda base in Iraq (or in a Sunni piece of Iraq).
It seems like there is now an al Qaeda problem in Iraq, but there was not one when we got there.

Oliver_Wendell_Ramone 08-28-2007 06:39 PM
The Emporer is Jerking Off to Boy's Life
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
ummm, are you aware of an Oregon Senator the Dems ran out because of simply making suggestive comments (allegedly) to an intern? Are you aware that the only proof the Dems had to run him off was his diary that showed when he was younger he actually had sex with an intern? Do you know at all of hisotry? Clinton's impeachment was simply the crows coming home to roost.
Packwood? 1, there was more to it than that, and 2, it was really all about the box wine, anyway.

And who dictates highly personal and potentially damaging diary entries, anyway?

Tyrone Slothrop 08-28-2007 06:50 PM
Interesting Letter and response
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Spanky
Yes. The worst consquence for our failure in Iraq for US national security would be an Al Queda base in Iraq (or in a Sunni piece of Iraq).
Based on your second sentence, you don't seem to be responding to the question I was asking, which was going to whether the bigger problem for us in Iraq -- now, not in a hypothetical future -- is Al Qaeda or sectarian violence. Since Al Qaeda's aim in Iraq is to stir sectarian violence through high-profile attacks, the answer is pretty obvious. The fundamental problems right now are that there is no law and order or functioning government, and that the Sunnis, Shias and Kurds are trying to kill each other. Al Qaeda is making this worse.

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 08-28-2007 06:54 PM
Interesting Letter and response
 
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
It seems like there is now an al Qaeda problem in Iraq, but there was not one when we got there.
Oh, the irony! We should invade Iraq to eliminate the foothold for terrorists.

Hank Chinaski 08-28-2007 06:57 PM
They had me at "barbershop quartet."
 
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
From the NYT:

"By Roll Call’s account, the officer said Mr. Craig had tapped his foot, in what the officer called a known signal to engage in lewd conduct, and had also brushed his foot against the investigator’s and waved his hand under the stall divider several times before the officer showed him his badge. After the arrest the senator denied any sexual intent, and in a statement issued Monday afternoon he attributed the matter to a misunderstanding."

Apparently there had been complaints about sexual activity in the bathrooms in question. I have no clue where the line is on where you can arrest someone. This seems stupid, considering what construction workers (or whatever) do w/r/t lewd gestures. I guess that doesn't actually ever result in sexual activity, though.


ETA from yahoo (or AP or Reuters): "Craig, 62, has faced rumors about his sexuality since the 1980s, but allegations that he had engaged in gay sex have never been substantiated. Craig has denied the assertions, which he calls ridiculous."

It doesn't seem like there are any allegations that airport security or the city police or whatever were trying to frame him/targeting him, so I am kind of intrigued. But, whatever. I don't think that voting against gay marriage is a sign that one is virulently anti-gay.
I've answered all this, other than to say i am surprised you think it okay for cops to arrest people for proposing sexual congress between consenting adults.

ltl/fb 08-28-2007 07:00 PM
They had me at "barbershop quartet."
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I've answered all this, other than to say i am surprised you think it okay for cops to arrest people for proposing sexual congress between consenting adults.
You didn't know what the fuck happened, so you couldn't have answered it.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 08-28-2007 07:03 PM
They had me at "barbershop quartet."
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I don't understand why the police in the Minneapolis airport are arresting people for what he did. It doesn't strike me as a crime, and you would think they could find something better to do.
The only reason this particular bit of behavior should be taken seriously is because of Craig's take on Monica and Bill.

I am gravely disappointed, however, that I now must write to my old torts professor and suggest that he adjust some grades. After all, he had taught us "there's no harm in asking", and that turns out to be wrong.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-28-2007 07:06 PM
They had me at "barbershop quartet."
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
The only reason this particular bit of behavior should be taken seriously is because of Craig's take on Monica and Bill.
Monica was working for Bill. Craig was out looking for congress with consenting adults.

sebastian_dangerfield 08-28-2007 07:16 PM
They had me at "barbershop quartet."
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
if you were truly a champion of gay rights, you would be bothered that he got arrested at all. say if, before you got married, you were in the Minneapolis airport, you saw a really hot woman, and maybe she liked you, you said "hey let's go behind that ticket booth over there and get busy- kill 5 minutes" You should be arrested? how is it different? the proposed sex was homo so he should get arrested? Sup Ct. said that don't go.

And I don't have a problem with the story being published, I just am curious if the tone of the posts here don't imply that the fact he might be gay is the underlying joke. If these guys have some other motivation, they should proceed. I'm just trying to keep it clean in case ncs' friends ever do stop to read here.
I assume you're joking by using "should." Clearly, you know I have no issue with public sex. But it is illegal, even in a bathroom. Gay, straight or whatever.

Um, he is clearly gay, or bisexual. And that's not funny or unfunny. What's funny is that he was running around demonizing gays while he was clearly a homosexual or bisexual. The "funny" is in the hypcorisy, not where he sticks his dick.

sebastian_dangerfield 08-28-2007 07:19 PM
They had me at "barbershop quartet."
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I've answered all this, other than to say i am surprised you think it okay for cops to arrest people for proposing sexual congress between consenting adults.
If it's against the law to propose sexual congress in a bathroom, the officer was merely doing his job. I think that's a shitty law, and I think it was a flimsy case. But I also think the senator is a full of shit hypocrite who ought to be tarred and feathered for his two-faced bullshit. It's just that simple. If you say "Gay lifestyles are wrong" while you are leading a gay life, you are a hypocrite. And if you do it to pander for votes, you're a loathsome hypocrite.

Hank Chinaski 08-28-2007 07:19 PM
They had me at "barbershop quartet."
 
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
You didn't know what the fuck happened, so you couldn't have answered it.
no "fuck" happened.

Fortune 250 companies come to me and ask for my advice. You call lawyers and ask for their's, and then pay for it. you should learn to listen when I tell you stuff.

Hank Chinaski 08-28-2007 07:21 PM
They had me at "barbershop quartet."
 
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
If it's against the law to propose sexual congress in a bathroom, the officer was merely doing his job. I think that's a shitty law, and I think it was a flimsy case. But I also think the senator is a full of shit hypocrite who ought to be tarred and feathered for his two-faced bullshit. It's just that simple. If you say "Gay lifestyles are wrong" while you are leading a gay life, you are a hypocrite. And if you do it to pander for votes, you're a loathsome hypocrite.
what law? I can ask someone for sex in the waiting area, but not the restroom? if there is a law your outrage should be there. I'm done. You lose. Next issue.

LessinSF 08-28-2007 07:22 PM
They had me at "barbershop quartet."
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Monica was working for Bill. Craig was out looking for congress with consenting adults.
1. He, rightly or wrongly, pleaded guilty to a crime;

2. Roll Call, rightly, reported that a U.S. Senator pleaded guilty to a crime;

3. His past actions suggest he is a hypocrite;

4. If I was an Idaho voter, I would want to know this; and

5. I have no problem admitting that I take glee from watching a self-righteous hypocrite fall from grace in a humiliating, public fashion.

sebastian_dangerfield 08-28-2007 07:24 PM
The Emporer is Jerking Off to Boy's Life
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
ummm, are you aware of an Oregon Senator the Dems ran out because of simply making suggestive comments (allegedly) to an intern? Are you aware that the only proof the Dems had to run him off was his diary that showed when he was younger he actually had sex with an intern? Do you know at all of hisotry? Clinton's impeachment was simply the crows coming home to roost.
Clinton was repayment for Packwood? If not for Packwood's ouster, the GOP would never have spent $50 million chasing Bill Clinton into a corner about a blow job? Is that your position?

Packwood was a gnat. Clinton was targeted by Newt, who ushered in a form of Roveian partisanship years before Rove and that dimwit McRepublican we elected ever thought of running for office.

Hank Chinaski 08-28-2007 07:26 PM
They had me at "barbershop quartet."
 
Quote:
Originally posted by LessinSF
1. He, rightly or wrongly, pleaded guilty to a crime;

2. Roll Call, rightly, reported that a U.S. Senator pleaded guilty to a crime;

3. His past actions suggest he is a hypocrite;

4. If I was an Idaho voter, I would want to know this; and

5. I have no problem admitting that I take glee from watching a self-righteous hypocrite fall from grace in a humiliating, public fashion.
4. is because he's a hypocrite or a fag? are you saying 4 from your standpoint or from the typical Idaho voter's, because i agree most Idaho voters want to know, but that's because they hate fags.

but why al the legs here? a politician is a hypocrite? okay, but it's been done to death already. I merely ask why these liberals keep posting it- I suggest they need to look into their own hearts and ask why. I know why they do it.

sebastian_dangerfield 08-28-2007 07:28 PM
They had me at "barbershop quartet."
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
what law? I can ask someone for sex in the waiting area, but not the restroom? if there is a law your outrage should be there. I'm done. You lose. Next issue.
What don't you understand about the word "if"? I said "if" it's against the law. If it's not against the law, well then I agree. I think arresting him was wrong.

But that's not even the issue, though you're trying to make it the issue because on the real issue - whether this man is a laughable hypocrite - you have no argument.

I'll move onto the next issue. Please define it for me first, since you have an endless bag of them you throw up to deflect or maneuver away from the real issue when cornered.

ltl/fb 08-28-2007 07:29 PM
They had me at "barbershop quartet."
 
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
What don't you understand about the word "if"? I said "if" it's against the law. If it's not against the law, well then I agree. I think arresting him was wrong.

But that's not even the issue, though you're trying to make it the issue because on the real issue - whether this man is a laughable hypocrite - you have no argument.

I'll move onto the next issue. Please define it for me first, since you have an endless bag of them you throw up to deflect or maneuver away from the real issue when cornered.
He's weird and annoying today.

Hank Chinaski 08-28-2007 07:29 PM
The Emporer is Jerking Off to Boy's Life
 
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield

Packwood was a gnat.
he was a man ruined for nothing. he was a dedicated senator who was forced to resign since his diary indicated he convinced an aide to fuck him. at long last do you have so little empathy that you can call him a gnat?

sebastian_dangerfield 08-28-2007 07:30 PM
They had me at "barbershop quartet."
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
4. is because he's a hypocrite or a fag? are you saying 4 from your standpoint or from the typical Idaho voter's, because i agree most Idaho voters want to know, but that's because they hate fags.

but why al the legs here? a politician is a hypocrite? okay, but it's been done to death already. I merely ask why these liberals keep posting it- I suggest they need to look into their own hearts and ask why. I know why they do it.
Because they hate gays?

I received this from TY earlier:

:Sebby,

:I hate gays. Almost as much as I hate Hank.
:GGG and SAM hate them a lot too.

:Long live Ruth Ginsburg,
:Ty

sebastian_dangerfield 08-28-2007 07:31 PM
They had me at "barbershop quartet."
 
Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
He's weird and annoying today.
As opposed to his usual coherence?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:45 AM.
Page 66 of 126 « First 16566465 66 676876116 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com