LawTalkers - Fashionistas you have arrived 3-25-03

You sure you aren't my wife?

S(I know I beat this topic to death, but I just can't ever state emphatically enough how much I dig chicks who see no need to wear underwear)D

fufu	06-19-2003 05:40 PM

funky fries fizzle

Quote:

Originally posted by str8outavannuys
Dill Pickle Hostess chips, I remember. Ketchup, I remember. Chocolate? Not so much.

My favorite Canadian snack foods:

1. Jos Louis
2. Wine gums (also British, of course)
3. Canadian Oreos
4. Smarties (no, not those Smarties, the other ones) (also British)
5. Crispy Crunch
6. Caramilk bars
7. Mr. Big
8. Crunchie
9. Aero bars (mmmm, bubbles).

str(does anyone except GWNC and Thrash know what I'm talking about)8

St*8. I know about 2, 4, 8 and 9.

I love:

1. Hula Hoops
2. Aero Peppermint
3. Jaffa Cakes
4. Golden Syrup
5. Ribena
6. Lucozade (when my stomach is upset)
7. Galaxy milk chocolate
8. Cadbury's Flake and Snow Flake

ABBAKiss

06-19-2003 05:41 PM

Vanity?

Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
having an orgasm burns 112 calories while faking an orgasm burns around 350

Okay, this is just stupid. First of all, it takes a lot to burn 100 calories--like running a mile. Also, an individual's weight affects how quickly calories are burned. Aside from the ridiculous specificity of "112 calories" this would have to be one long and spastic orgasm.

But if this is true, it could be that the skinny ones are not fakers, but rather multi-orgasmic. Four real orgasms would still burn more than one fake one.

sebastian_dangerfield

06-19-2003 05:42 PM

Vanity? A Stroke?

Quote:

Originally posted by Oliver_Wendell_Ramone
Dude, Pigpen was sooooo much more that "the Dead's first keyboard player."

Ollie,

I was just thinking the same thing the other night while listening to a '69 "Good Morning Little School Girl."

S(You gotta give props to a cat who can make a 25 minute Lovelight interesting)D

ltl/fb

06-19-2003 05:42 PM

Vanity?

Quote:

Originally posted by ABBAKiss
Okay, this is just stupid. First of all, it takes a lot to burn 100 calories--like running a mile. Also, an individual's weight affects how quickly calories are burned. Aside from the ridiculous specificity of "112 calories" this would have to be one long and spastic orgasm.

But if this is true, it could be that the skinny ones are not fakers, but rather multi-orgasmic. Four real orgasms would still burn more than one fake one.

Yeah yeah yeah. Don't worry, we won't let on to your husband you've been faking it all these years.

Tyrone Slothrop

06-19-2003 05:44 PM

Nomads & iPods

Quote:

Originally posted by zakoh02
After checking out the reviews on CNET, I stopped off at Best Buy and picked up a Creative Nomad Zen Jukebox. I have to give this thing a serious thumbs up. For $299, I got a 20 GB hard drive, which is enough to hold most of my stolen music collection (you pay $200 more for the same drive in an iPod). It has a rechargeable battery, which holds juice for 12-14 hrs per charge. Took it to the gym and absolutely love the thing. No more having to move songs back and forth from the laptop to the player (and since I am lazy, that usually means I am stuck bouncing on the elliptical to the same songs for six month). Anyway, just thought I would pass along the recommendation for anyone who likes working out to their MP3 collection.

I've been thinking about getting a Nomad or an iPod and would appreciate being steered in one direction or the other.

BTW, $499 gets you a 30MB drive from Apple, but $299 there will only get you 10MB, not 20MB.

ThrashersFan

06-19-2003 05:44 PM

Vanity?

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
A corollary of this is that men with thin gfs/wives are bad in bed.

http://www.c4vct.com/kym/humor/csex.htm
http://www.thenaughtydog.com/nau4.html

spree: humorous websites about sex and calories.

Replaced_Texan

06-19-2003 05:46 PM

First hand account of trading spaces

A friend of a friend's house is going to be on the season premire of Trading Spaces. My friend has posted her friend's account of the whole thing from auditioning for the show to the taping of the episode on her website at: http://www.popgurls.com/article_show.php3?id=361

sebastian_dangerfield

06-19-2003 05:47 PM

Vanity?

Quote:

Originally posted by paigowprincess
My burrito consumption has not changed at all. Its about two to four a week as it always has been. Five on a good week. However now I say to myself, Mmmmmm a delicious 900 calorie burrito, thanks burger ! every time. But if I had guilt over burritos, I would probably eat less. I dont bc they are comprised of protein (beans and rice) veggies and salsa and "easy on the cheese" bc too much cheese is gnarly. Oh, and there is a flour tortilla for energy. Quite frankly, I dont think they are unhealhty. I am not discussing the chips.

Right, bc that is exactly what I am recommending.

Because I cant work with the bold edit hassle thing, read my comments in the brackets if you were gonna skip the burger quote bc you already read it.

The thing I hate about fatties is they take up precious sidewalk space. Ditto umbrellas and double ditto the dread combination of the two. I also hate when they stand on the left side of the metro escalator or drive excessively the three blocks to the fast food emporrum bc its more annoying traffic clogging the crosswalks. And the honking! I hate mc donalds bc of the rainforest issues, the poor animals that are eaten en masse and the littering tendencies of its clientele. Otherwise, I dont give a flying fuck. I think my oeuvre of posts has demonstrated this more than people have cared to read. You are clearly conflating my posts with the fatist stuff expressed here today. Fat people make me look good.not quite

Paigow,

If I ask nicely, will you FedEx me a Burrito Bros spinach and black bean burrito? All this talk of DC burritos has me salivating.

S(once ate two of those lil' footballs back to back - didn't feel right for a day or so)D

sebastian_dangerfield

06-19-2003 05:51 PM

Vanity?

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
Not if the fatties are dying younger, the insufferable Harold Bloom notwithstanding, while the non-fatties ("thinnies") are lingering on into senescence, soaking younger fatties for their geriatric care.

This topic is big, self-congratulatory, never-ending circle jerk.

Yes, but thinnies are great eye candy. Nothing better than checking out chicks' asses on the street in Spring/Summer.

FYI - Lose the shirt tied around the ass. If you've got junk in the trunk, the SOFA look just accentuates it.

ThrashersFan

06-19-2003 05:51 PM

Vanity?

Quote:

According to this calorie calculator, I burn 64.8 calories watching TV for an hour. I am not sure if a 112 calorie orgasm is so unbelievable. I think the fake burns more because you are trying so hard to do something that should happen naturally with ease.

http://www.nutri-facts.com/calcalc.asp

bilmore

06-19-2003 05:52 PM

Nomads & iPods

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
I've been thinking about getting a Nomad or an iPod and would appreciate being steered in one direction or the other.

Aside from the advantage that, with an iPod, you can join all sorts of clubs and groups and circles comprised of people who like to sit around and tell each other how smart their choice was and affirm to each other that they aren't really losers for buying an Apple product, and that Mac, of course, Rulez, you can . . . . you can . . .

No, I guess it's just that one.

(iPod support/service has been a problem. Plus, if you value connectivity, it binds you into buying Macs forever, unless you are brave enough to try the shareware that supposedly connects the two systems. There is no real sound quality difference. Apple's manufacturing quality has generally been good - at least, better than never-before-heard-of brands like Nomad. Finally, read about Apple's new download music store - that only works with the iPod, and might be worthwhile for you.)

ABBAKiss

06-19-2003 05:55 PM

Vanity?

Quote:

Originally posted by ThrashersFan
According to this calorie calculator, I burn 64.8 calories watching TV for an hour. I am not sure if a 112 calorie orgasm is so unbelievable. I think the fake burns more because you are trying so hard to do something that should happen naturally with ease.

http://www.nutri-facts.com/calcalc.asp

If your orgasms last one hour, congrats.

drhathaway

06-19-2003 05:56 PM

Paradise Hotel

Quote:

Originally posted by evenodds
How was this show?

Ahhh, the perfect post for my re-entrance to the FB after a self-imposed two-odd year hiatus (not that anyone would have noticed the departure...or probably really cares about the re-entrance).

Mr. Hathaway and I actually watched this last night, me through my fingers and saying "Why in the hell am I watching this instead of reading a good book?"* the whole time.

Totally cheesy, totally overacted. We'll be watching again on Monday.

Dr. (probably one of the fatties, but hey, someone's gotta give y'all something to bitch about) Hathaway

* Currently reading "A Man Called Intrepid"...old, but seeming relevant these days.

ThrashersFan

06-19-2003 05:58 PM

Vanity?

Quote:

Originally posted by ABBAKiss
If your orgasms last one hour, congrats.

I didn't say that they did. I was merely saying that sitting like a statue for an hour burns 64.8 calories so it seems like the energy put into an orgasm could conceivably burn up 112. I find orgasms to be pretty powerful things and it doesn't seem weird to me that they would burn up some calories. Shit, just digesting the 2,000 calories a day that people consume burns 200 calories.

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 AM.

Page 682 of 1795

682

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page