K Race
 

second

K Race
 

rule.

K Race
 

you should stop this. it is relatively easy to ignore a thread title, as mentioned. This bit is harder to ignore, and I think it safe to say any included humor has now been tapped out.

K Race
 

I love the revised thread title! It's so much cleaner now, and has restored a sense of order. And tomorrow night I am getting a deep tissue massage. This week is really picking up.

K Race
 

Best post ever!

The funniest thing about you is that you act like you're best friends with posters like paigow, nfh and ppnyc. While you're really just egging them on to post more ridiculousness, all the while laughing at them behind their back. I'm many things that aren't so great, but at least I'm honest. And I'd rather make fun of someone to their face than turn them into a big joke when they turn the other way. Now that's real comedy. Woo hoo!

TM

K Race
 

First off, Thurgreed, you insist I am his sock. And then if not you imply that we "really aren't friends" and he's laughing at me secretly. Penske and I have been IMing and emailing for years now and I think he's a great guy. Perhaps he might find my posts annoying but he really doesn't attack me on the board. I consider him to be a good friend over the years. That is unfair what you stated.

K Race
 

You sock?

K Race
 

If you want him to read it, remember to ask someone to quote you.

K Race
 

Not even a litigator, yet he argues in the alternative. And people say deal guys aren't real lawyers.

(P.S. He did not imply, he expressed. )

K Race
 

Careful RP. I don't think those are necessarialy alternative positions. The shreads of Penske's personalities that write the primary stuff could think the shreads that do the socks are retarded, and a source of derisive humor.

K Race
 

Careful, Hank. It's offensive to imply that someone has multiple personalities. The other day I described my afternoon as "schizophrenic" and my other personality called me a retarded asshole for using the term.

K Race
 

Tell her she should get a life so she isn't e-mailing you at midnight.

K Race
 

TOS violation? Although it wouldn't be the first with that sock.

K Race
 

In an effourt to be kinder gentler and more behaviouralised I went with the cleaner title, although I have also authorized removing the extra dash at the start, which, no offence, was not my idea.

K Race
 

His [Thurgreed's] irritating positions about whether I exist or not when we are quite probably both in close proximity and he could verify I find quite annoying--don't need to be a litigator to argue that point[s]. **Not that at this point I want to meet him, I do not.******I am a she, and I am not a deal atty.

K Race
 

:brick:

I was talking about [Thurgreed]. I know you are a she and not a lawyer. Mind like a steel trap, I have.

K Race
 

Maybe in the future you should be careful to refer to Thurgreed as "he" and ppnyc as "she"? That should be easy enough to follow.

K Race
 

You mischaracterise me.

1. My "relationship" with Paigow is not what you assert. While I am not above criticsing her, I am also fairly open with her and she knows what is what. There are plenty of places, or at least, where I weighed in on my thoughts on Paigow, under my name, without her being "present". I don't think any of my comments were anything I never communicated to her and/or were duplicitous,

2. Sometimes I pick on nfh and sometimes I am supportive. Much like with ppnyc I don't necessarily understand what the feeding frenzy on her is. Her posts can be insipid, but everyone posts crap sometimes and her links don't particularly bother me. I did lie when I said I have met her, which lie I think was obvious, but again, it was in part because I think the continued serious shit she got from people was just that. Shit. I have corresponded with her offline and my understanding was that she was a she, and so I didn't have a problem endorsing that. Maybe I naive, but I have since heard from a third party I trust, whom apparently met her, that she is a she,

3. About ppnyc, what she said below. I have never engaged in any games with her on the board. All of you have claimed she is my sock for years. I have told many people offline that this is not true. If you don't like her, don't read her.

K Race
 

Thanks. I will try that. Is your firm hiring?

K Race
 

Maybe in your quest to find a clearly defined and less blury on line persona you could sharpen and tighten up your posts to be more clearly defined and less blurry...eh?

K Race
 

Many thanks, as always, Penkse.

K Race
 

Expressed or inferred?

K Race
 

I have often wondered what your real relationships are with people given the amount of shit you are all too happy to stir up with your "cooperative" antics, which you appear to consider a game, but, as everyone knows all too well at this point, involves a lot of personal animus for some other players. (And I'm not talking only about animus directed toward me; my wonder actually preceded that period.)

K Race
 

Oooh, you little button-pusher you! You really know how to hurt my feelings, blurry as they are.

K Race
 

Maybe, I am able to compartmentalise my relationships.

Other than my "relationship" with Paigow, I am not sure who you are referencing. I recall that I expressed my thoughts on this subject to you. Given that it's impossible for me, from my position, to verify what is she said/she said in some difference with people, I see no reason to take sides. That said, behavior that was out of bounds, in my opinion, I called out. To you and her.

I have no animus to you and don't think I have really participated in any antics towards you, notwithstanding that you and she have a thing. I also, as above, very explicitly told you things that I thought were bullshit about those antics, and communictated the same to her.

My cyberfriendship with Sunny is no different, notwithstanding that the two of them don't get along. I don't get involved, I don't need to, it is none of my business. Why should it be?

Riders of Lohan!
 

What are you talking about? It hasn't even started.

Riders of Lohan!
 

Yes. But only the A&W Cream Soda. No one likes that crap.

K Race
 

Aren't ellipses defined as three periods in succession? I don't mind ellipses. I mind multiple ellipses in a row.

ETA: you changed it. Much better. I am officially un-retired.

Riders of Lohan!
 

\


Oh. I had a running dream last night......and a sex in a womens' prison dream. Possible relation?

K Race
 

Not sure. I am a grammatical retard. I wanted 5 sets of ellipseses, less one dot, but I settled for one ellipses.

K Race
 

I said "get a life," not "get a job at a firm." Jaysus.

K Race
 

I'm a mean bitch deep down inside. sniff.

AoN to Bergdorf's at lunch to buy bras.

K Race
 

Any litigators who are looking for a new home in LA, SF or NY, my firm is advertising a $15,000 referral bonus. Anyone interested (usual 50-50 split applies) please PM me.

K Race
 

How does your firm feel about ellipses?

K Race
 

I'm lost. Was it before or after your pregnancy (plus the three or so post-partum months when you likely didn't have a period)?

LessinCork

K Race
 

I try to get along to get along. I currently have only one actual enemy on the boards, and he/she knows what I am talking about all too well.

K Race
 

Actually, that's not what quite I was talking about and the "antics" to which I was referring were not directed toward me. For the record, I don't think anyone should have, or should be expected to have, mutually exclusive friendships.

I perhaps inaccurately believe that you have participated in antics relating to accusations of admin abuse and that you have otherwise posted or encouraged postings that keep stirring up old grudges.

K Race
 

Or so you think. I know I speak for other here when I say that we find you deeply annoying.

Yet oh so pretty!

K Race
 

Actually when I retired from socking, that hater poster may have retired too. Not that I know that, if you know what I mean and I hope that you do or at the very least that you can infer what I may be implying. Or not. sts.

Cheerio mate,

P

K Race
 

Did your location have any role in your decision to post about periods?