LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   The babyjesuschristsuperstar on Board: filling the moral void of Clinton’s legacy (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=719)

Hank Chinaski 12-01-2005 07:17 PM

POLL QUESTION
 
are my Penske-style posts hitting the authenticity mark? Are they contributing positively to this board?

Spanky 12-01-2005 07:19 PM

California Politics is the best.....
 
This is why I love California Politics...... The Governator just appointed a lezbian, former pro-choice lobbyist, former head of the California Democratic Party as his Chief of Staff.

In today's Political Diary: Darn It, He Just Can't Resist Anyone Named Kennedy

Thursday, December 1, 2005, Wall Street Journal's Opinion Journal


An episode of the TV political drama "The West Wing" could never top the bizarre appointment Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has made as his new chief of staff, the top administrative post in his government. Susan Kennedy is the former deputy chief of staff to Gray Davis, the discredited, spendthrift governor whom Mr. Schwarzenegger replaced after a recall.

While highly competent, Ms. Kennedy's liberal pedigree is so extensive that she told the Los Angeles Times just last May she was first inspired politically by Jane Fonda's Vietnam-era activities. Indeed, on arriving in California as a young woman, her first move was to join the Santa Monica-based Campaign for Economic Democracy, run by radical activist Tom Hayden, Ms. Fonda's then-husband. GOP legislators are stunned that their governor could take the risk of so completely alienating the conservative activists he'll need to win re-election. "I can't convince people to walk precincts for the governor if he has appointed as his top aide someone who so admired Jane Fonda and Tom Hayden that she went to work for them," a conservative leader told me.

Ms. Kennedy is currently a member of the state Public Utilities Commission, to which Gray Davis appointed her a few weeks before he was recalled in 2003. Schwarzenegger adviser Mike Murphy insists that her conservative critics are playing "to a stereotype off an old resume" and that "she has been a free-market hero at the PUC." Ms. Kennedy herself told reporters yesterday she supported all of Governor Schwarzenegger's ballot initiatives last month, but no one can find any public evidence to back up the claim. "That's not the Kennedy philosophy many Capitol Democrats had known," Los Angeles Times columnist George Skelton dryly observes. Indeed, Ms. Kennedy told reporters yesterday: "I've been 25 years in the Democratic Party, 25 years slogging for candidates and causes I believed in and still believe in. And my philosophy has not changed."

But her new boss is sweeping past such concerns. "She's willing to set her Democratic philosophy aside and do the job and do my vision -- to be able to work together with Democrats and Republicans," he told reporters. He says that "95%" of those he has called are supportive of her appointment.

He must either be highly selective in his calling or those on the other end were being highly deferential. A longtime personal friend of the governor calls the Kennedy appointment, coupled with reports the governor's next budget will be chock full of new spending, "inexplicable and politically suicidal." A former Democratic state legislator compared Ms. Kennedy's appointment to the ill-fated nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court. Still another ally was told by the governor that Mr. Schwarzenegger could find no Republican capable of doing the job he wanted done. "I don't know what's worse," the ally told me, "that he's either psyched himself into believing that or that he's convinced himself I would believe him."

The governor will now enter his re-election campaign with a liberal chief of staff who has no credibility with the GOP legislators he needs as a base of support for his initiatives. He will face one of two liberal Democratic opponents next fall: state Treasurer Phil Angelides or state Comptroller Steve Westly. At least his new chief of staff will be able to provide some insights into his potential opponents. She's worked closely with both of them. Mr. Angelides was Ms. Kennedy's boss when she was executive director of the California Democratic Party in the 1990s. As for Mr. Westly, his new chief of staff, Ross LaJeunesse, happens to have been Ms. Kennedy's chief of staff until last July. Before that, he was a top aide to Senator Edward Kennedy, who is Mr. Schwarzenegger's relative.

If Governor Schwarzenegger appears comfortable with all this, it's because he's convinced himself he's now covered all his political bases. Save for one. He's just forgotten the conservative base that happened to have put the recall on the ballot that made him governor in the first place.

-- John Fund

Spanky 12-01-2005 07:20 PM

POLL QUESTION
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
are my Penske-style posts hitting the authenticity mark? Are they contributing positively to this board?
They are pretty good but not as good as the original. Where is that bastard anyway?

Hank Chinaski 12-01-2005 07:35 PM

POLL QUESTION
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
They are pretty good but not as good as the original. Where is that bastard anyway?
He died.:( :(

Dimwit Democrat 12-01-2005 07:57 PM

POLL QUESTION
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
are my Penske-style posts hitting the authenticity mark? Are they contributing positively to this board?
they make it positively clear that you are a total dick, if thats what you're getting at

Dimwit Democrat 12-01-2005 07:58 PM

POLL QUESTION
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
He died.:( :(
A good start.

Sexual Harassment Panda 12-01-2005 08:03 PM

POLL QUESTION
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
He died.:( :(
He's BAACK!

Penske, nice to see you - I note your resignation lasted a little longer than Hank's.

Hank Chinaski 12-01-2005 08:05 PM

POLL QUESTION
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sexual Harassment Panda
He's BAACK!

Penske, nice to see you - I note your resignation lasted a little longer than Hank's.
it seems so. I stopped to read your PM and you beat me from my "He has risen" post. got to remember first rule is- PMs always come after posts.

Hank Chinaski 12-01-2005 08:36 PM

a simple solution?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
They are pretty good but not as good as the original. Where is that bastard anyway?
http://wbrower.net/OBB/images/Ann_Coulter.gif
Spankster. Better?

Penske-style post!TM

Tyrone Slothrop 12-01-2005 09:05 PM

Don't tell me that flying is dangerous....
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
The highways are a meat grinder but no one seems to notice.



Death toll from road accidents 390 times that from terrorism: study

The body count from road accidents in developed economies is 390 times higher than the death toll in these countries from international terrorism, says a study appearing in a specialist journal, Injury Prevention. In 2001, as many people died every 26 days on American roads as died in the terrorist attacks of 9/11, it says.


Researchers led by Nick Wilson of Otago University, New Zealand, trawled through a US State Department database of deaths caused by international terrorism, and compared this with an Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development database on road crash deaths among 29 OECD countries.

The study covered two years, in 2000 and 2001.

The authors acknowledge the widespread emotional, political and economic impacts of terrorism, but they also point out the enormous difference in scale between the two death tolls.

"Policymakers need to be aware of this when allocating resources to preventing these two avoidable causes of mortality," they say.
Hours late to the party, and no stp, but there is a well-developed literature about people's tendencies to assess risks poorly. In particular, people are much more concerned with unfamiliar risks than with familiar risks. The unfamiliar is scary. The flu kills a lot more people than terrorism every year, but we spend a lot more money addressing the latter.

If Burger already posted on this stuff, what he said.

Tyrone Slothrop 12-01-2005 09:08 PM

I'd be living in a sod shack, eatin potatoes, if he hadn't come.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Bob
Still bitter that "Columbus Day" has become "Indigenous Peoples Day"?
Is Podunkville in South Dakota?

(If this is outable, please call your friendly local moderator.)

Spanky 12-01-2005 09:43 PM

a simple solution?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
http://wbrower.net/OBB/images/Ann_Coulter.gif
This comment from Ann Coulter was just as irresponsible as all the comments about pulling out, or the constant mantra that we can't win or that we are losing.

One way we are sure to lose this war is if the people of the middle east see this as a religious war. If it is a religious war there is no reason for any of the citizens of Iraq to support us.

We can only win the war on terror with Muslim support and this comment completely undercuts it. This comment may have convinced one or many insurgents to join the battle and those insurgent may have killed one or more American soliders.

This comment gave comfort and aid to the enemy (in the propaganda war) and cannot be critisized enough. I agree with many of the things she writes, but this comment is unforgiveable and, if it was not the result of sheer stupidiy then it borders on treason.

Hank Chinaski 12-01-2005 09:46 PM

a simple solution?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
This comment from Ann Coulter was just as irresponsible as all the comments about pulling out, or the constant mantra that we can't win or that we are losing.

One way we are sure to lose this war is if the people of the middle east see this as a religious war. If it is a religious war there is no reason for any of the citizens of Iraq to support us.

We can only win the war on terror with Muslim support and this comment completely undercuts it. This comment may have convinced one or many insurgents to join the battle and those insurgent may have killed one or more American soliders.

This comment gave comfort and aid to the enemy (in the propaganda war) and cannot be critisized enough. I agree with many of the things she writes, but this comment is unforgiveable and, if it was not the result of sheer stupidiy then it borders on treason.
before you criticize ann remember that Penske-style allows photoshop of false info into an image

Spanky 12-01-2005 09:53 PM

a simple solution?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
before you criticize ann remember that Penske-style allows photoshop of false info into an image
I am pretty sure she said that. I think that is what got her kicked off MSNBC.

Is there anyone that does not think this is a completely irresponsible statement and sharply undercuts our efforts on the war on terror?

Hank Chinaski 12-01-2005 10:01 PM

a simple solution?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
I am pretty sure she said that. I think that is what got her kicked off MSNBC.

Is there anyone that does not think this is a completely irresponsible statement and sharply undercuts our efforts on the war on terror?
penske probably would defend it, but he died.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:47 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com