LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   All Hank, all the time. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=734)

Adder 08-14-2006 03:10 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
again, to focus on airports is to ignore the real targets that are most threatened and least protectible. you all seem to ignore it.

What do you think will happen once the terrorists start blowing themselves up on the subway or at ballgames?

the attacks on the Embassies, WTC 1, the Cole all occured before Iraq and Afghanistan- 20000 jihadis were trained in Afghanistan Before 9/11.

Does getting out of Iraq and Afghanistan take us back to those days of safety? really- don't we have to throw Israel to the wolves also, and what if they want us to give up France or England?
In a way, we should probably be reassured that the latest foiled plots involved airplanes. It could be read to suggest that the terrorists do not feel they are in a position to attack these softer targets.

Or perhaps it only suggests that they think airplanes make for better press. Regardless, it is only a matter of time.

Spanky 08-14-2006 03:13 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
anyone who can be perceived as leaders of those men cannot be making a statement that implies at all the actions of these men was understandable.
.
Exactly. This seems so obvious to me. How can someone even argue with this?

Tyrone Slothrop 08-14-2006 03:13 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
The rest of the world was also subjected to endless propaganda (rigged photos, staged events, inflated casualty numbers), spewed by a complicit media, to make the Israelis look like a bunch of senseless butchers.

Where are the Reuters photos of the Israeli dead and the destruction from all the Hezzbollah rockets? Reading the papers, one would forget that Israel was merely defending itself.
Have you compared the numbers of dead and injured on each side? Israel was not getting the worst of it, which is one reason it wanted to prolong the conflict to try to do damage to Hezbollah. A few weeks (?) later, this is not looking like the wisest strategy, since Israel appears to have overestimated the damage it was doing. To Hezbollah, if not to Lebanon.

Quote:

Need I list (again) all of the Islamic terrorist activity pre-Bush?
To observe that our Middle East policies stirs up animus against us is not to suggest that we are the cause of all unhappiness and/or terrorism.

Adder 08-14-2006 03:15 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Exactly. This seems so obvious to me. How can someone even argue with this?
Because it seems a little strange to get your panties in too much of a bunch over a statement that didn't say anything new or surprising.

You're right on the PR (obviously, or we wouldn't be talking about it), but it is expected.

Spanky 08-14-2006 03:19 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I'm at a loss to understand how Members of Parliament "can be perceived as leaders of . . . crazy Islamic men."
Are you really this obtuse? If someone refers to themself as a leader of the the Islamic community then why is it so crazy to see them as having a leadership position over someone in that community.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-14-2006 03:20 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
I am sure that it does. I'm sure that from their perspective it also means bombing a rocket launcher and killing an innocent bystander in the process.

They equate the two. Do you?

And they seem to give no special attention to addressing their own. That's the problem.
I tried to avoid equating the two, only to have Hank put those words in my mouth. Did you not read those posts, or are you just trying to be irritating?

What you are now saying is that it's not enough that they condemn the sort of terrorism that offends us the most -- they also have to publicly state that that kind of terrorism is special -- it's worse than everything else in the world. Where does this obligation come from?

Which is worse: 3,000 people dead on 9/11, or 400,000 people dead in Darfur? 9/11 troubles me more, because it's closer to home, but I don't think that everyone should have to feel the same way.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-14-2006 03:22 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
At this time they should have just condemned the actions and left it at that. Adding that such actions should be expected with Britians policies in the middle east makes it signed like they are partially justifiying and are using an implied threat.

Right after such an attack they should just vociferously and unequivacoly condemn the terrorist acts and leave it at that. If they have a problem with British foreign policy now is not the time to bring it up.
As a matter of PR, I agree with you.

If we are responding to what they said, rather than to how others will respond to what they said, I disagree for the reasons stated.

Spanky 08-14-2006 03:23 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop

(d) If those British MPs had put out an open letter condemning Islamist terrorism in the strongest possible terms, is there any chance at all that anyone who reads this board would have heard about it? I doubt it. (I'm not blaming any of us. We get our news from media. Controversy sells.)
This post implys that you agree that they one we are discussing did not condemn Islamist terrorism in the strongest possible terms. Don't you think it was a mistake not condemn Islamist terrorism in the strongest possible terms?

SlaveNoMore 08-14-2006 03:23 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Adder
How many rockets were fired into Israel from Southern Lebanon this year before Israel started bombing Lebanon?
Quite frankly, any number greater than 1 is more than enough.

I take it you find no issue with kidnapping soldiers and dragging them across national borderlines?

Tyrone Slothrop 08-14-2006 03:25 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Are you really this obtuse? If someone refers to themself as a leader of the the Islamic community then why is it so crazy to see them as having a leadership position over someone in that community.
You're the expert on reading comprehension, apparently, so perhaps you can point out the sentence here where they refer to themselves as leaders of the Islamic community:
  • Prime Minister, As British Muslims we urge you to do more to fight against all those who target civilians with violence, whenever and wherever that happens.

    It is our view that current British government policy risks putting civilians at increased risk both in the UK and abroad.

    To combat terror the government has focused extensively on domestic legislation. While some of this will have an impact, the government must not ignore the role of its foreign policy.

    The debacle of Iraq and now the failure to do more to secure an immediate end to the attacks on civilians in the Middle East not only increases the risk to ordinary people in that region, it is also ammunition to extremists who threaten us all.

    Attacking civilians is never justified. This message is a global one. We urge the Prime Minister to redouble his efforts to tackle terror and extremism and change our foreign policy to show the world that we value the lives of civilians wherever they live and whatever their religion.

    Such a move would make us all safer.

SlaveNoMore 08-14-2006 03:25 PM

Another voice
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
Not really, no. If you actually believe that you could expel all Arabs from the US without a major violent opposition, you're living in far more of a state of delusion than I thought.
Adel Darwish, writing in Asharq Alawsat, says:

Quote:

"The main problem lies in finding the way to combat terrorism, which is an impossible task if we do not defeat its ideology, as Blair mentioned in his Los Angeles lecture and at his press conference last week. At any other time or in any other era prior to the emergence of the hard-line fundamental Islam, Bin Laden, Al-Zawahiri, Al-Zarqawi, Al-Qaradawi, the Muslim Brotherhood, and others, these British-born young men would have been proud of belonging to their country, Britain, and would have been loyal to their country in which they live and on whose ground they earn their livelihoods.

The danger is that these young men have been brainwashed, and now they do not recognize the national belonging to the country, and they consider themselves to belong to a mythical expression some people call "Islamic Caliphate," or what they think to be an Islamic nation. This is similar to the utterance pronounced publicly by the general guide of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, "To hell with Egypt, the father of Egypt, and those who established Egypt." Therefore, these brainwashed Muslim Britons say "to hell" with Britain, to which their parents emigrated voluntarily looking for a culturally and economically better life, and they were not forced by anyone to come here. These young men say, or are taught to say "to hell" with life itself when they turn themselves into human suicide bombs.

The imams of corruption and hatred lied to these young men when they promised them that they would go to Paradise. Would any rational person believe that a person who committed suicide and who killed dozens of women and children will go to Paradise?

Perhaps for the hundredth time I join those who called in the past for expelling the imams of evil and hatred from Britain. In the absence of a religious affairs ministry, the Friday sermons and lessons ought to be subjected to the Interior Ministry through the supervision of Islamic academics, and they all should be delivered in English. If any of these imams did not want to master the English language, or refused to be integrated in Britain and to live as a Briton according to the laws and culture of the country, then he would be free to go back to where he came from, the same as he was free to come here. This is particularly true if he does not like the British way of life, and he considers it infidelity, he should leave this infidelity, go to the land from which he came, and join the society he likes.

At the same time, let the leftwing and liberal tendencies abandon political correctness, which they justify on the basis of respecting their cultural peculiarities. This is a fallacy, and a method that will lead to the isolation of Muslims, and their being locked up in a cultural "Ghetto" or "Muslim reservation," which in turn will create those who will install themselves as leaders of Muslims and lead them to perdition.

This is the legal aspect. As for the social, political, and cultural aspects, law alone is not sufficient. Purging Islam and Muslim communities in Britain of harmful ideas is up to the Muslims themselves. They could kick the imams of evil and the promoters of terrorism out of Britain, so that Britain remains the country of tolerance and amicability, and the capital of the Arabs and Muslims in the western countries.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-14-2006 03:29 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
This post implys that you agree that they one we are discussing did not condemn Islamist terrorism in the strongest possible terms. Don't you think it was a mistake not condemn Islamist terrorism in the strongest possible terms?
As a question of PR? I'm really not interesting in that question. I have a good sense of how their letter was received among lawyers who post on this board. I have no idea how it was received in the UK, apart from Slave's post.

What would the strongest possible terms be? They could say, acts of terrorism offend us more than eating rats. That's pretty strong. But then someone could point out that they didn't say, acts of terrorism offend us more than eating rats while watching Kathy Bates in a hot tub in About Schmidt, and -- voila -- again they've failed to denounce terrorism in the strongest possible terms.

Hank Chinaski 08-14-2006 03:30 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
You're the expert on reading comprehension, apparently, so perhaps you can point out the sentence here where they refer to themselves as leaders of the Islamic community:
  • Prime Minister, As British Muslims we urge you to do more to fight against all those who target civilians with violence, whenever and wherever that happens.

    It is our view that current British government policy risks putting civilians at increased risk both in the UK and abroad.

    To combat terror the government has focused extensively on domestic legislation. While some of this will have an impact, the government must not ignore the role of its foreign policy.

    The debacle of Iraq and now the failure to do more to secure an immediate end to the attacks on civilians in the Middle East not only increases the risk to ordinary people in that region, it is also ammunition to extremists who threaten us all.

    Attacking civilians is never justified. This message is a global one. We urge the Prime Minister to redouble his efforts to tackle terror and extremism and change our foreign policy to show the world that we value the lives of civilians wherever they live and whatever their religion.

    Such a move would make us all safer.

gosh! you're right they don't. hey, wait. didn't they like, you know, sign it? did they list any titles or anything by their names? how do you get to be in Parliment?

Sidd Finch 08-14-2006 03:30 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
OK. I don't disagree (hi Sidd!) with that.

but it's really the fault of an educational system that ghettozies people of non-European descent into shoddy schools.

Sidd Finch 08-14-2006 03:31 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Adder
How many rockets were fired into Israel from Southern Lebanon this year before Israel started bombing Lebanon?
More than zero.

Adder 08-14-2006 03:31 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Quite frankly, any number greater than 1 is more than enough.

I take it you find no issue with kidnapping soldiers and dragging them across national borderlines?
Is it a number more than 1? I didn't think so, but am willing to be corrected.

And yes, I find issue with killing and kidnapping soldiers, I'm just not sure that I view bombing cities to be an appropriate response.

SlaveNoMore 08-14-2006 03:32 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Tyrone Slothrop
Have you compared the numbers of dead and injured on each side? Israel was not getting the worst of it, which is one reason it wanted to prolong the conflict to try to do damage to Hezbollah. A few weeks (?) later, this is not looking like the wisest strategy, since Israel appears to have overestimated the damage it was doing. To Hezbollah, if not to Lebanon.
Israel attempted surgically strikes at the enemy. They alreted civilians ahead of time that they were going to attack.

That the enemy cares naught about civilian life, that it uses human shields and puts rocket launchers on the roofs of buildings it fills with handicapped children, is a bit problematic when trying to minimize collateral damage.

What's the over/under on this ceasefire anyway? I give it until Thursday.

Sidd Finch 08-14-2006 03:40 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I tried to avoid equating the two, only to have Hank put those words in my mouth. Did you not read those posts, or are you just trying to be irritating?
Sometimes, when you ask a question, you do so because the answer is obvious. Here, I said CAIR equates blowing up passenger jets with killing an attack on a military installation that kills an innocent bystander -- because that is what their statement does. Then I said "do you?", knowing full well that the answer is "of course not," and thus hoping to point out the distinction between what you know to be right and what you posited as being an appropriate, positive statement by CAIR.

It was kind of like saying "what they are really saying is this. Is that really what you believe?" Presumably, you would not assume that I was accusing you of believing "that."



Quote:

What you are now saying is that it's not enough that they condemn the sort of terrorism that offends us the most -- they also have to publicly state that that kind of terrorism is special -- it's worse than everything else in the world. Where does this obligation come from?
The obligation to be leaders of their communities. When they equate the bombing of passenger jets with attacks on military installations, they teach that the latter justifies the former.

And no -- they did not "condemn the sort of terrorism that offends us the most." They published an anemic statement that essentially reads "we think killing people is bad."


Quote:

Which is worse: 3,000 people dead on 9/11, or 400,000 people dead in Darfur? 9/11 troubles me more, because it's closer to home, but I don't think that everyone should have to feel the same way.
Nor do I.

On the other hand, while Darfur troubles me a lot more than Abu Ghraib, as an American I feel it is my obligation to speak out against Abu Ghraib. And would feel that much more strongly if I were a leader of Americans.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 08-14-2006 03:42 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Israel attempted surgically strikes at the enemy. They alreted civilians ahead of time that they were going to attack.

That the enemy cares naught about civilian life, that it uses human shields and puts rocket launchers on the roofs of buildings it fills with handicapped children, is a bit problematic when trying to minimize collateral damage.

What's the over/under on this ceasefire anyway? I give it until Thursday.
No, I think it goes until the end of August. No better time for a little live ammo than Labor Day Weekend and the week before, when Americans won't be paying attention. Let the UN guys back in the day after labor day.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-14-2006 03:43 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
gosh! you're right they don't. hey, wait. didn't they like, you know, sign it? did they list any titles or anything by their names? how do you get to be in Parliment?
But you're so clever -- you figured out that they represent those parliamentary districts populated solely by crazy Islamic men.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-14-2006 03:47 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Israel attempted surgically strikes at the enemy. They alreted civilians ahead of time that they were going to attack.
The rest of the world falls for Hezbollah PR, but you've chosen to fall for Israeli PR. "Surgical strikes?" And a number of Lebanese were killed on the roads, so you can understand why the alerts might have been less than fully effective.

Quote:

That the enemy cares naught about civilian life, that it uses human shields and puts rocket launchers on the roofs of buildings it fills with handicapped children, is a bit problematic when trying to minimize collateral damage.
It's worse than "cares naught about." Hezbollah is strengthened by the fatalities.

Quote:

What's the over/under on this ceasefire anyway? I give it until Thursday.
That's an excellent question.

Hank Chinaski 08-14-2006 03:51 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
But you're so clever -- you figured out that they represent those parliamentary districts populated solely by crazy Islamic men.
Solely? Slave said only 30%. And I said 1%, but 100% of the crazy 1% live there-

At this point I quit. You can't be this dense. You are nothing more than Penske, w/o the humor- or at least the crazed glint in the eye.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-14-2006 03:52 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Sometimes, when you ask a question, you do so because the answer is obvious. Here, I said CAIR equates blowing up passenger jets with killing an attack on a military installation that kills an innocent bystander -- because that is what their statement does."
No it doesn't, Sidd -- it "condemn[s] all acts of terrorism, whether carried out by individuals, groups or states." It continues to say: "We repudiate anyone or any group that plans or carries out a terrorist act. We welcome early actions by law enforcement authorities against credible threats to the safety of the traveling public."

You are reading into that first sentence an assumption that the reference to state-sponsored terrorism means what you say. If a Bush admininistration official used the same words, though, you would think of Iran or North Korea. The release is titled, "CAIR STATEMENT ON ALLEGED AIRLINE TERROR PLOT." Not "CAIR STATEMENT EQUATING ALLEGED AIRLINE TERROR PLOT WITH AWFUL THINGS DONE BY ISRAEL."


Quote:

On the other hand, while Darfur troubles me a lot more than Abu Ghraib, as an American I feel it is my obligation to speak out against Abu Ghraib. And would feel that much more strongly if I were a leader of Americans.
I agree with you there. But although I am a Christian, I don't feel an obligation to speak out when Eric Rudolph kills a doctor (e.g.).

Tyrone Slothrop 08-14-2006 03:55 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Solely? Slave said only 30%. And I said 1%, but 100% of the crazy 1% live there-

At this point I quit. You can't be this dense. You are nothing more than Penske, w/o the humor- or at least the crazed glint in the eye.
See ya. Come on back when you don't feel like being a jackass.

Hank Chinaski 08-14-2006 03:58 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
See ya. Come on back when you don't feel like being a jackass.
What % of people had to agree that Penske was a net-negative before RT kicked him off? I want to be upfront with you. I am starting a petition and need to know how many names I need to get.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-14-2006 04:04 PM

FOX journalists abducted in Gaza.
 
Another bad PR move.

Penske_Account 08-14-2006 04:21 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I'm sick and tired of hearing that your political party has a fucking monopoly on this war against terrorism, as if the rest of us don't get it. Your song and dance is lame, and reflects a serious lack of anything serious to say.
Unless he is right, and then that is all he has to say.

Sidd Finch 08-14-2006 04:24 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I agree with you there. But although I am a Christian, I don't feel an obligation to speak out when Eric Rudolph kills a doctor (e.g.).
If you were a leader of the chuch to which he professed allegiance, and if he was one of dozens who professed such allegiance and carried out the same kinds of attacks, and if their conduct was supported by many people with in your congregation, then you would either speak out against their conduct in particular*, or I would say that you were part of the problem.



*by "in particular" I mean not saying "killing is bad, whether done by bombers or doctors"


eta: Strike "congregation," insert "denomination."

Tyrone Slothrop 08-14-2006 04:24 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Unless he is right, and then that is all he has to say.
Your song and dance is lame, and reflects a serious lack of anything serious to say.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-14-2006 04:26 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
If you were a leader of the chuch to which he professed allegiance, and if he was one of dozens who professed such allegiance and carried out the same kinds of attacks, and if their conduct was supported by many people with in your congregation, then you would either speak out against their conduct in particular*, or I would say that you were part of the problem.



*by "in particular" I mean not saying "killing is bad, whether done by bombers or doctors"
OK. I agree. But I don't think that any Muslim, or a Muslim MP, as such has the sufficiently tight relationship with the terrorists/criminals that you are getting at here such that they have some obligation to speak out.

Adder 08-14-2006 04:28 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch

*by "in particular" I mean not saying "killing is bad, whether done by bombers or doctors"


I am not going to do any research (what else is new, eh?) but i would be willing to bet that there was many a "Christian" church leader who said exactly that about Rudolph.

ltl/fb 08-14-2006 04:28 PM

Can we kill them all?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
Wouldn't internment camps be better? That way we could keep an eye on them. Plus think about how many jobs would be created.
On (3), just non-citizens? Or do we get rid of citizens who are Hezbollah (sp) supporters and whatnot? How do we identify them?

Is Hezbollah (sp) characterized as a terrorist group? Because I thought after 9/11 support fo terrorists is a crime, and that most non-citizens can be deported for crimes. So not necessarily seeing why we can't already do (3).

Sidd Finch 08-14-2006 04:29 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
OK. I agree. But I don't think that any Muslim, or a Muslim MP, as such has the sufficiently tight relationship with the terrorists/criminals that you are getting at here such that they have some obligation to speak out.

Argh. I think you are being deliberately dense.

This is not about who has a "tight relationship" with the bombers. They are too far gone. The way to deal with them is a bullet.

This is about who has influence with the community from which those bombers come -- a frightfully large number of which seem to support those bombers.

Once again -- community leaders need to speak against the wrongful acts committed by members of their community and in the name of their community. Whether the community is a country, a faith, a political party, or whatever else. We have seen shamefully little of that from Muslim leaders.

Penske_Account 08-14-2006 04:31 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Solely? Slave said only 30%. And I said 1%, but 100% of the crazy 1% live there-

At this point I quit. You can't be this dense. You are nothing more than Penske, w/o the humor- or at least the crazed glint in the eye.
Ironically, in a coincidentally serendiptuous way, I was about to post that, despite the Bunifa fucking over, npi, that you could have my proxy on the issues of the day. I proactively excercise a prior rescindment of such intended proxy.

Why so much hate? Maybe the Imans of your community are affecting you? Is hate contagious?

Sidd Finch 08-14-2006 04:32 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Adder
I am not going to do any research (what else is new, eh?) but i would be willing to bet that there was many a "Christian" church leader who said exactly that about Rudolph.

I am willing to bet that you are right. And I think that those leaders are at fault for such crimes.


And yet, I am also willing to bet that many more mainstream Christian leaders spoke out against Eric Rudolph and his ilk.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-14-2006 04:35 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Argh. I think you are being deliberately dense.

This is not about who has a "tight relationship" with the bombers. They are too far gone. The way to deal with them is a bullet.

This is about who has influence with the community from which those bombers come -- a frightfully large number of which seem to support those bombers.

Once again -- community leaders need to speak against the wrongful acts committed by members of their community and in the name of their community. Whether the community is a country, a faith, a political party, or whatever else. We have seen shamefully little of that from Muslim leaders.
This business of attacking moderates for not speaking out more against extremists is not useful. I would suggest that attacking moderates for being on the side of terrorists does strengthen them, or induce them to speak out more. It does tend to lump them all together at a point when we ought to be finding ways to marginalize the extremists. And it's a sort of cheap talking point that the fighting keyboardists can use to prove how tough they are on terrorism. I agree that it would be a better world if the moderate Muslims spoke out more. If the question is, how do we strengthen moderates Muslims so that they will speak out more, I'm not sure what the right answer is, but I feel fairly comfortable that this isn't it.

Penske_Account 08-14-2006 04:36 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
What % of people had to agree that Penske was a net-negative before RT kicked him off? I want to be upfront with you. I am starting a petition and need to know how many names I need to get.
My understanding was that there was no threshold number, but the final tally on the petition was 71%, although that included my socks.

ltl/fb 08-14-2006 04:37 PM

Heads cut off
 
w/r/t slave's statement about peopel who want to cut off his head on TV, I think he's safe from that if he doesn't leave the US. Whoever suggested he leave the greater SF area is correct -- I fear for his sanity/heart attack risk if he stays. Maybe one of the wilder areas of Colorado? Perhaps adjacent to some white supremacist organization? I don't think he's white supremacist; I just would like to see how much his opinions on stuff are really reactions to what he sees going on in his immediate vicinity.

Ditto for Penske.

Penske_Account 08-14-2006 04:38 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Your song and dance is lame, and reflects a serious lack of anything serious to say.
And your song and dance and that of your pals from the blogosphere remains seriously out of touch with the American populace, which will again be shown to y'all, whether you can absorb the lesson or not, come November.

Tyrone Slothrop 08-14-2006 04:40 PM

Do yourselves a favor and shut the hell up.............
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
And your song and dance and that of your pals from the blogosphere remains seriously out of touch with the American populace, which will again be shown to y'all, whether you can absorb the lesson or not, come November.
We shall see. I prefer to blame the messengers, not the message.

eta: If I wanted my thoughts to be accepted and ratified by the voters, I would run for office. I prefer to hang out here instead. I understand that "the left doesn't understand terror" may work well as a political attack, but I'm sick of answering such crap here. If you want to spout that crap to people who will applaud, go hang out with the freepers.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:13 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com