LawTalkers

LawTalkers (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/index.php)
-   Politics (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Meet your new thread, same as the old thread. (http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=781)

Gattigap 11-06-2007 12:42 PM

Time to take a stand.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
If a political party announces that, if its representatives are elected, it will impose harsh punishments for certain crimes and undertake various policy measures designed to promote a specific religion, and they are elected in a free and fair election, and they impose those punishments and undertake those measures, am I not living in a democracy?
You would be living in an illiberal democracy. Oddly enough, when Slave hungers for "democracy," he longs for a liberal democracy. The terminology may be painful to consider, but there you are.

Hank Chinaski 11-06-2007 12:47 PM

Time to take a stand.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
Racist fuck.
i just can't spell long words

Hank Chinaski 11-06-2007 12:48 PM

Time to take a stand.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Bob
Interesting. The place weed was discussing has those same people (well, different denominations, but close enough for the PB), and they already have a nuke or three.

And that one guy is living there, too, probably. What was his name again?
water.

hint- "those same people" don't control the bomb right now.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 11-06-2007 12:48 PM

Time to take a stand.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
i just can't spell long words
As long as I can call you an I-tal, you can call me a Paki.

futbol fan 11-06-2007 12:56 PM

Time to take a stand.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
water.

hint- "those same people" don't control the bomb right now.
I shudder to think what might happen if control over Pakistan's nuclear arsenal were to fall out of the hands of reliable secular humanists like A.Q. Khan.

SlaveNoMore 11-06-2007 01:24 PM

Time to take a stand.
 
Quote:

ironweed
If a political party announces that, if its representatives are elected, it will impose harsh punishments for certain crimes and undertake various policy measures designed to promote a specific religion, and they are elected in a free and fair election, and they impose those punishments and undertake those measures, am I not living in a democracy?
What if the moment those elected in immediately decide to deny half the population - say all women - of not only the right to vote, but the ability to drive and to read.

It may still be a "democracy" - but it sure isnt what (I think) you deem a "Democracy"

SlaveNoMore 11-06-2007 01:27 PM

Time to take a stand.
 
Quote:

Gattigap
You would be living in an illiberal democracy. Oddly enough, when Slave hungers for "democracy," he longs for a liberal democracy. The terminology may be painful to consider, but there you are.
Actually, Slave hungers* for a "liberal Democracy" and not a "Liberal democracy"



*that, and an Egg McMuffin

Tyrone Slothrop 11-06-2007 01:33 PM

"Paulmentum."
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
I am not yet sure I like her, but it doesn't matter.
I don't like the way she campaigns. I haven't figured out yet whether this is a good indication of how she would govern.

Gattigap 11-06-2007 01:36 PM

Time to take a stand.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Actually, Slave hungers* for a "liberal Democracy" and not a "Liberal democracy"

"Making the world safe for small "l" liberal democracy."

I dunno. I think it'll be a hard sell in the heartland.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 11-06-2007 02:11 PM

Time to take a stand.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
What if the moment those elected in immediately decide to deny half the population - say all women - of not only the right to vote, but the ability to drive and to read.

It may still be a "democracy" - but it sure isnt what (I think) you deem a "Democracy"
So the U.S. was not a democracy until 1920?

SlaveNoMore 11-06-2007 03:23 PM

"Paulmentum."
 
Quote:

Tyrone Slothrop
I don't like the way she campaigns. I haven't figured out yet whether this is a good indication of how she would govern.
I believe your people are lining up behind Ron Paul.

SlaveNoMore 11-06-2007 03:24 PM

Time to take a stand.
 
Quote:

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
So the U.S. was not a democracy until 1920?
Some blacks in the South would say not until the 60's.

Tyrone Slothrop 11-06-2007 04:27 PM

"Paulmentum."
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
I believe your people are lining up behind Ron Paul.
Who are my people?

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) 11-06-2007 04:50 PM

Time to take a stand.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Some blacks in the South would say not until the 60's.
But no one else?

taxwonk 11-06-2007 04:53 PM

Time to take a stand.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
It's making me a bit uncomfortable, actually. Can you take a couple of steps back? Thanks.

But seriously, no one else finds the story of an independent Supreme Court asserting its constitutional powers in the face of an executive bent on subverting the law, with the members of the bar protesting non-violently in the streets in support the least bit compelling? To me it seems like a fascinating sort of alternative reality.
I've never been a fan of the little opportunistic fuck. But right now, I'm finding that there are far more places that cry out for intervention than there are peole to intervene. It's all rather immobilizing, to be honest.

taxwonk 11-06-2007 04:57 PM

Time to take a stand.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
So the U.S. was not a democracy until 1920?
This is a topic that is subject to a wide range of debate.

Spanky 11-06-2007 10:03 PM

"Paulmentum."
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
You keep saying this, but the Democrats are doing nothing in the public eye but shooting themselves in the foot.

See today's impeachment resolution by Dennis "UFO" Kucinich as Exhibit A.
Have you looked at the Presidents approval ratings recently. And by the way, Congressonal approval ratings have nothing to do with the presidential race. Low approval of a Democrat congress does not mena that will bleed over to the Dem candidate for President. Congress almost always has a low approval rating.

Unless the occupation takes a dramatic turn for the better, our candidate does not have a shot.

Spanky 11-06-2007 10:06 PM

Time to take a stand.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by ironweed
If a political party announces that, if its representatives are elected, it will impose harsh punishments for certain crimes and undertake various policy measures designed to promote a specific religion, and they are elected in a free and fair election, and they impose those punishments and undertake those measures, am I not living in a democracy?
No you are not. Democracies can vote themselves out of existence like the Germans did with the Nazis.

LessinSF 11-06-2007 10:08 PM

"Paulmentum."
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
I believe your people are lining up behind Ron Paul.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071106/..._fundraising_7

Hank Chinaski 11-06-2007 10:10 PM

"Paulmentum."
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Spanky
Have you looked at the Presidents approval ratings recently. And by the way, Congressonal approval ratings have nothing to do with the presidential race. Low approval of a Democrat congress does not mena that will bleed over to the Dem candidate for President. Congress almost always has a low approval rating.

Unless the occupation takes a dramatic turn for the better, our candidate does not have a shot.
As the election approaches the head choppers will kick up in Iraq and Iran. They know a Dem president is the best bet for the jihadis, don't you remember Osama coming out and saying if Kerry wins thing will be better for us?

Based upon your prediction, and Ty's arguments that Bush has over ruled the constitution anyway, I today signed an email to the President for the proposition that I am a lawyer, and I want him to enact martial law rather than turn this country over to the appeasers.

god bless these untied states!

sebastian_dangerfield 11-06-2007 11:54 PM

"Paulmentum."
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
Having discernable goals and understanding what can be achieved by military force and what requires political involvement goes a long way.

I am not yet sure I like her, but it doesn't matter. She would be vastly more competant than the current administration, and that matters.
You underestimate her. I'm confident she can live up to Bush II's standards, and then some (or less, depending on how you like to phrase it).

sebastian_dangerfield 11-07-2007 12:02 AM

"Paulmentum."
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski

god bless these untied states!
This is great.

Atticus Grinch 11-07-2007 12:11 AM

Godwin does not play dice with the universe.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
They know a Dem president is the best bet for the jihadis, don't you remember Osama coming out and saying if Kerry wins thing will be better for us?
JFC. You never seemed stupid before. Hypo: You're Joachim von Ribbentrop. It's May 7, 1940. Hitler asks you whom he should endorse in the Norway Debate. What do you tell him? My respect for you is riding on your answer.

Hank Chinaski 11-07-2007 12:14 AM

"Paulmentum."
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
This is great.
thanks. would you give atticus a quote for classes in how to read my posts?

Hank Chinaski 11-07-2007 12:14 AM

"Paulmentum."
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
This is great.
thanks. would you give atticus a quote for classes in how to read my posts?

SlaveNoMore 11-07-2007 12:21 AM

"Paulmentum."
 
I know where you are going with this, but you're way wrong.

If anything, it's just further [sad] evidence of the accumulation of wealth by a bunch of moronic gamers with stock options.

Hank Chinaski 11-07-2007 11:57 AM

  • A Tale of Two Houses

    House #1 A 20 room mansion ( not including 8 bathrooms ) heated by natural gas. Add on a pool ( and a pool house) and a separate guest house, all heated by gas. In one month this residence consumes more energy than the average American household does in a &! nbsp;ye ar. The average bill for electricity and natural gas runs over $2 400. In natural gas alone, this property consumes more than 20 times the national average for an American home. This house is not situated in a Northern or Midwestern "snow belt" area. It's in the South.

    House #2
    Designed by an architecture professor at a
    Leading national university. This house incorporates every "green" feature current home construction can provide. The house is
    4,000 square feet ( 4 bedrooms! ) and is nestled on a high prairie in the American southwest. A central closet in the house holds geothermal
    Heat-pumps drawing ground water through pipes sunk 300 feet into the ground. The water (usually 67 degrees F. ) heats the house in the winter and cools it in the summer. ; The system uses no fossil fuels such as oil or natural gas and it consumes one-quarter electricity required for a conventional heating/cooling system. Rainwater from the roof is collected and funneled into a 25,000 gallon underground cistern. Wastewater from showers, sinks and toilets goes into underground purifying tanks and then
    Into the cistern. The collected water then irrigates the land surrounding the house Surrounding flowers and shrubs native to the area enable the property to blend into the surrounding rural landscape. ! & nbsp;

    ~~~~~
    HOUSE #1 is outside of Nashville, Tennessee; it is the abode of the "environmentalist" Al Gore.

    HOUSE #2 is on a ranch near Crawford,
    Texas; it is the residence the of the President of the United States, George W. Bush.

    An "inconvenient truth".

taxwonk 11-07-2007 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
  • A Tale of Two Houses

    House #1 A 20 room mansion ( not including 8 bathrooms ) heated by natural gas. Add on a pool ( and a pool house) and a separate guest house, all heated by gas. In one month this residence consumes more energy than the average American household does in a &! nbsp;ye ar. The average bill for electricity and natural gas runs over $2 400. In natural gas alone, this property consumes more than 20 times the national average for an American home. This house is not situated in a Northern or Midwestern "snow belt" area. It's in the South.

    House #2
    Designed by an architecture professor at a
    Leading national university. This house incorporates every "green" feature current home construction can provide. The house is
    4,000 square feet ( 4 bedrooms! ) and is nestled on a high prairie in the American southwest. A central closet in the house holds geothermal
    Heat-pumps drawing ground water through pipes sunk 300 feet into the ground. The water (usually 67 degrees F. ) heats the house in the winter and cools it in the summer. ; The system uses no fossil fuels such as oil or natural gas and it consumes one-quarter electricity required for a conventional heating/cooling system. Rainwater from the roof is collected and funneled into a 25,000 gallon underground cistern. Wastewater from showers, sinks and toilets goes into underground purifying tanks and then
    Into the cistern. The collected water then irrigates the land surrounding the house Surrounding flowers and shrubs native to the area enable the property to blend into the surrounding rural landscape. ! & nbsp;

    ~~~~~
    HOUSE #1 is outside of Nashville, Tennessee; it is the abode of the "environmentalist" Al Gore.

    HOUSE #2 is on a ranch near Crawford,
    Texas; it is the residence the of the President of the United States, George W. Bush.

    An "inconvenient truth".

The Crawford property sounds pretty cool.

Tyrone Slothrop 11-07-2007 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
  • A Tale of Two Houses

    House #1 A 20 room mansion ( not including 8 bathrooms ) heated by natural gas. Add on a pool ( and a pool house) and a separate guest house, all heated by gas. In one month this residence consumes more energy than the average American household does in a &! nbsp;ye ar. The average bill for electricity and natural gas runs over $2 400. In natural gas alone, this property consumes more than 20 times the national average for an American home. This house is not situated in a Northern or Midwestern "snow belt" area. It's in the South.

    House #2
    Designed by an architecture professor at a
    Leading national university. This house incorporates every "green" feature current home construction can provide. The house is
    4,000 square feet ( 4 bedrooms! ) and is nestled on a high prairie in the American southwest. A central closet in the house holds geothermal
    Heat-pumps drawing ground water through pipes sunk 300 feet into the ground. The water (usually 67 degrees F. ) heats the house in the winter and cools it in the summer. ; The system uses no fossil fuels such as oil or natural gas and it consumes one-quarter electricity required for a conventional heating/cooling system. Rainwater from the roof is collected and funneled into a 25,000 gallon underground cistern. Wastewater from showers, sinks and toilets goes into underground purifying tanks and then
    Into the cistern. The collected water then irrigates the land surrounding the house Surrounding flowers and shrubs native to the area enable the property to blend into the surrounding rural landscape. ! & nbsp;

    ~~~~~
    HOUSE #1 is outside of Nashville, Tennessee; it is the abode of the "environmentalist" Al Gore.

    HOUSE #2 is on a ranch near Crawford,
    Texas; it is the residence the of the President of the United States, George W. Bush.

    An "inconvenient truth".

Sounds like terrific design there on the Crawford ranch. Good for Bush.

Tyrone Slothrop 11-07-2007 01:06 PM

For those of you who say that water-boarding isn't torture:
  • As a former Master Instructor and Chief of Training at the US Navy Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape School (SERE) in San Diego, California I know the waterboard personally and intimately. SERE staff were required undergo the waterboard at its fullest. I was no exception. I have personally led, witnessed and supervised waterboarding of hundreds of people. It has been reported that both the Army and Navy SERE school’s interrogation manuals were used to form the interrogation techniques used by the US army and the CIA for its terror suspects. What was not mentioned in most articles was that SERE was designed to show how an evil totalitarian, enemy would use torture at the slightest whim. If this is the case, then waterboarding is unquestionably being used as torture technique.

    The carnival-like he-said, she-said of the legality of Enhanced Interrogation Techniques has become a form of doublespeak worthy of Catch-22. Having been subjected to them all, I know these techniques, if in fact they are actually being used, are not dangerous when applied in training for short periods. However, when performed with even moderate intensity over an extended time on an unsuspecting prisoner – it is torture, without doubt. Couple that with waterboarding and the entire medley not only “shock the conscience” as the statute forbids -it would terrify you. Most people can not stand to watch a high intensity kinetic interrogation. One has to overcome basic human decency to endure watching or causing the effects. The brutality would force you into a personal moral dilemma between humanity and hatred. It would leave you to question the meaning of what it is to be an American.

via Volokh Conspirator Jonathan Adler

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 11-07-2007 01:06 PM

The Party of Lincoln? What does this say about Old Abe?
 
More sick and frustrated republicans.

What's with you guys?

SlaveNoMore 11-07-2007 01:39 PM

The Party of Lincoln? What does this say about Old Abe?
 
Quote:

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
More sick and frustrated republicans.

What's with you guys?
Yes, I'm quite sure the fact that he was Republican in a useless local legislature (where probably everyone is a Republican, for that matter) had something to do with the fact the guy is a disgusting scumbag who should be waterboarded (Hi - Ty!!!)

Not Bob 11-07-2007 02:44 PM

I'm a Ford, not a Lincoln. And Ford has a better idea.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Yes, I'm quite sure the fact that he was Republican in a useless local legislature (where probably everyone is a Republican, for that matter) had something to do with the fact the guy is a disgusting scumbag who should be waterboarded (Hi - Ty!!!)
And yet anonymous dope-smoking hiptards posting on Kos and the DU somehow are the personification of the true platform of the Democratic Party. Got it.

(note -- I actually agree with your post; just pointing out that your goose could use a little gander sauce. Uh, you know what I mean.)

sebastian_dangerfield 11-07-2007 02:47 PM

I'm a Ford, not a Lincoln. And Ford has a better idea.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Not Bob
And yet anonymous dope-smoking hiptards posting on Kos and the DU somehow are the personification of the true platform of the Democratic Party. Got it.

(note -- I actually agree with your post; just pointing out that your goose could use a little gander sauce. Uh, you know what I mean.)
Did you just advocate fowl bukkake?

Hank Chinaski 11-07-2007 03:30 PM

The Internet is making us stupid
Legal sage Cass Sunstein says democracy is the first casualty of political discourse in the digital age.


http://letters.salon.com/news/featur...view/?show=all read this, and try to follow it's simple suggestions

Tyrone Slothrop 11-07-2007 03:34 PM

sweet, sweet irony
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
The Internet is making us stupid
Legal sage Cass Sunstein says democracy is the first casualty of political discourse in the digital age.


http://letters.salon.com/news/featur...view/?show=all read this, and try to follow it's simple suggestions
The article about Sunstein's book is here. What you linked to is a bunch of Salon readers' comments on his article.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy 11-07-2007 03:36 PM

I'm a Ford, not a Lincoln. And Ford has a better idea.
 
Quote:

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Did you just advocate fowl bukkake?
The mind of a republican.

Look, I just report the news. I find it odd that all the sexual deviants who get elected seem to be bible-belt Republicans.

Has anyone else seen the move "The Naked Kiss"?

Hank Chinaski 11-07-2007 03:39 PM

sweet, sweet irony
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
The article about Sunstein's book is here. What you linked to is a bunch of Salon readers' comments on his article.
thank you. the link was in what i posted though. It is sort of the phenom I wrote about WRT reading, say lgf every day. I have broken away from the constraints. Anyone else?

Tyrone Slothrop 11-07-2007 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
For those of you who say that water-boarding isn't torture:
  • As a former Master Instructor and Chief of Training at the US Navy Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape School (SERE) in San Diego, California I know the waterboard personally and intimately. SERE staff were required undergo the waterboard at its fullest. I was no exception. I have personally led, witnessed and supervised waterboarding of hundreds of people. It has been reported that both the Army and Navy SERE school’s interrogation manuals were used to form the interrogation techniques used by the US army and the CIA for its terror suspects. What was not mentioned in most articles was that SERE was designed to show how an evil totalitarian, enemy would use torture at the slightest whim. If this is the case, then waterboarding is unquestionably being used as torture technique.

    The carnival-like he-said, she-said of the legality of Enhanced Interrogation Techniques has become a form of doublespeak worthy of Catch-22. Having been subjected to them all, I know these techniques, if in fact they are actually being used, are not dangerous when applied in training for short periods. However, when performed with even moderate intensity over an extended time on an unsuspecting prisoner – it is torture, without doubt. Couple that with waterboarding and the entire medley not only “shock the conscience” as the statute forbids -it would terrify you. Most people can not stand to watch a high intensity kinetic interrogation. One has to overcome basic human decency to endure watching or causing the effects. The brutality would force you into a personal moral dilemma between humanity and hatred. It would leave you to question the meaning of what it is to be an American.

via Volokh Conspirator Jonathan Adler
Misinformation about purported chemical weapons links between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda in Colin Powell's speech to the UN was obtained by tortured following rendition to Egypt:
  • In a CIA sub-station close to al Libi's jail cell, the CIA's "debriefers," who had been talking to al Libi for days after his return from Cairo, were typing out a series of operational cables to be sent Feb. 4 and Feb. 5 to the CIA Headquarters in Langley, Va. In the view of some insiders, these cables provide the "smoking gun" on the whole rendition program -- a convincing account of how the rendition program was, they say, illegally sending prisoners into the hands of torturers.

    Under torture after his rendition to Egypt, al Libi had provided a confession of how Saddam Hussein had been training al Qaeda in chemical weapons. This evidence was used by Colin Powell at the United Nations a year earlier (February 2003) to justify the war in Iraq. ("I can trace the story of a senior terrorist operative telling how Iraq provided training in these [chemical and biological] weapons to al Qaeda," Powell said. "Fortunately, this operative is now detained, and he has told his story.")

    But now, hearing how the information was obtained, the CIA was soon to retract all this intelligence. A Feb. 5 cable records that al Libi was told by a "foreign government service" (Egypt) that: "the next topic was al-Qa'ida's connections with Iraq...This was a subject about which he said he knew nothing and had difficulty even coming up with a story."

    Al Libi indicated that his interrogators did not like his responses and then "placed him in a small box approximately 50cm X 50cm [20 inches x 20 inches]." He claimed he was held in the box for approximately 17 hours. When he was let out of the box, al Libi claims that he was given a last opportunity to "tell the truth." When al Libi did not satisfy the interrogator, al Libi claimed that "he was knocked over with an arm thrust across his chest and he fell on his back." Al Libi told CIA debriefers that he then "was punched for 15 minutes." (Sourced to CIA cable, Feb. 5, 2004).

    Here was a cable then that informed Washington that one of the key pieces of evidence for the Iraq war -- the al Qaeda/Iraq link -- was not only false but extracted by effectively burying a prisoner alive.

ABC News. But we've got to keep torture legal in case we ever find someone who knows where there's a nuclear bomb about to go off in Manhattan!

Tyrone Slothrop 11-07-2007 03:50 PM

sweet, sweet irony
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
thank you. the link was in what i posted though. It is sort of the phenom I wrote about WRT reading, say lgf every day. I have broken away from the constraints. Anyone else?
I like this board because I know I will encounter people with whom I disagree.

eta: My web-browsing habits similarly include sites with a variety of views, particularly including people who do a good job of aggregating stories from a range of places, and generally not including sites like Kos or LGF with a partisan raison d'etre.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:15 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Hosted By: URLJet.com