Ringling Bros.
 

Good to see you come back to the fold on this one. The anti-semitic hate of the Soros/Moveon.org crowd cannot be tolerated on a Board of Peace and Tolerance.

An Open Message to Cindy Sheehan and George Soros courtesy of the PotUS
 

Can we at least agree not to post images that cause my computer to tell me that the certificate is invalid?

Cindy Sheehan, Brainless Moron?
 

You must be so proud of your boy. He's holding up a great big flap of the tent for y'all.

An Open Message to Cindy Sheehan and George Soros courtesy of the PotUS
 

I would agree with that but since I am not getting that message when I post or open the link for the foto how do I know, i.e. your computer is giving warnings that I am not getting.

A different proposal I have, that is not official TOS policy, but just an honour system thing (which I realize may be oxymoronically difficult for the liberals), how about if you respond to a post with a foto, you delete the link in the quote area so that the foto does not get posted repeated times via responses?

I'm down witdat.

First Amendment
 

In truth, it's rather pathetic. I suggest ignoring it and sooner or later, he'll get bored with the lack of reaction. Just pretend he's a little kid banging the lid of a pot on the kitchen floor.

Cindy Sheehan, Brainless Moron?
 

Yes, and that portion of the tent flap leads to the Soros/Kerry/Bobby Byrd wing of the democrat party. thanks, but no thanks.

Ringling Bros.
 

They should buy them mail order from catalogs, the way some guys do here in the States.

Cindy Sheehan, Brainless Moron?
 

Your boy's a Republican. You can deny, but that doesn't make it any less true.

But maybe you can photoshop a picture of David Duke shaking hands with Robert Byrd to maintain that wall of crap you're hiding behind.

First Amendment
 

What's pathetic is I can post a picture of one of the thousands of children maimed or killed at the hands of Arafat and Balt still pimps Arafats "Nobel Peace Prize Winner/leader of oppressed people" cred and you suggest ignoring it. Why don't all we look at the handiwork of PLO (or whatever the leadership of the Palestinians are calling themselves these days) and then those of us who believe in the righteousnes of killing children and innocents in the name of a mythical Palestinian State can defend such handiwork and their support of the hand behind it.

Here's a few more examples that I don't have fotos of but would be curious to have justified:

* the Maalot massacre in May 1974 in which a school building was taken over while children from Tzfat on a school trip were sleeping there. Three teachers and 22 schoolchildren were killed.


* the Munich Olympics slaughter, in which eleven Israeli athletes were killed in September 1972.


* the Nahariya/Avivim school bus attack, May 1970. Palestinian terrorists crossed the border from Lebanon, ambushed the bus with a barrage of gunfire, and murdered 12 children and 3 adults, and left several others crippled.


* the Kiryat Shmonah apartment building attack in April 1974: PFLP-GC terrorists penetrated the Israeli border town, entered an apartment building on Yehuda HaLevy St. and killed all 18 residents they found there, including 9 children.


* the Coastal Road bus hijacking of March 1978, in which 11 Fatah terrorists ,who infiltrated by sea, killed a photographer and a taxi driver and hijacked a bus filled with adults and many children. The terrorists fired on passing cars from the bus, and when they were finally stopped, they began firing missiles. The massacre left 35 people dead and 100 injured.

Cindy Sheehan, Brainless Moron?
 

It's not denying. Did you read what he wrote? He is drawing common ground with Cindy Sheehan. Who has common ground with George Soros and Moveon.org, huge supporters of Democrapper John Kerry, who has a fellow demo Bill Clinton who tried to negotiate away Israel's survival to the babykiller Arafat, which would make Soros, Moveon, Sheehan, Bobby Byrd and David Duke equally happy but would make my President, a man of faith, extremely upset. Thankfully, our Commander in Chief has more moral clarity than the whole of the Democrat party and would not sacrifice the Israelis to a death sentence at the hands of a terrorist organization led by a vile hateful babykiller:


http://www.mideasttruth.com/fatah-arafat_sy.gif

Who leads people who teach their children to hate the Israelis:


http://www.afsi.org/MEDIA/images/handgrenade.jpg

And who celebrated our loss on 911:

http://www.factsofisrael.com/en/imag...lebrate911.jpg

First Amendment
 

A) I didn't pimp Arafat. I noted that he was in fact awarded the Nobel prize and was the leader of the Palestinians, in the face of your apparent denial of both.

B) It's amazing how in the face of all those horrible things the Palestinians did over the years, Israel did neither nothing to provoke them nor retaliated with one ounce of excessive force.

Two wrongs don't make at right, by any means. But we talk to the Israelis (and sold them arms). We talk to Saddam (and sold him arms). We talk to the Iranians (and sold them arms). Why suddenly the hang-up about talking to Arafat (without actually selling him arms)?

First Amendment
 

You have lost all credibility. With you stupid fucking Hillary Clinton photoshops, and your autistic posting and re-posting of the Robert Byrd/Klan robes photoshop, and the elephant ass-fucking the donkey (although that at least was honest in that it genuinely portayed your current politcal discourse. You have become a parody. A satire of whatever it was that you honestly wanted to say.

Your message is now so polluted with the bile and hyperbole that have become your trademark that I, and I imagine many others, find it impossible to dissociate you from the hateful antics.

At least when you had 1000 socks people could pretend there was some small distance between you and the bullshit. But that's gone now. It's all to painfully apparent that there's this massive troll on board and his name is Penske.

Maybe some day you'll regain your sense of perspective and your ability to hold an honest dialogue. When that day comes, let me know. We'll talk.

Cindy Sheehan, Brainless Moron?
 

Penske to try and elevate this discussion. I would like you to answer some questions:

1) The main reason why the UN equated Zionism with racism is that any Jew anywhere in the world can move to Israel and become a citizen. However, any muslim palestinian who lived in Israel proper prior to its creation may not move back to their home. In addition, none of their decendants may either. If this is not a racist (or at least bigoted policy) why not?

2) The West Bank and Gaza are occupied by the Isreal.
(a) What right does Israel have to occupy these territories? (b) Palestinians in the West Bank are taxed by Israel but they have no representation in the Israeli government. Is this not taxation without representation? (c) Do the citizens of West Bank and Gaza have any right to self determination?

3) What gave the Jews in Palestine in 1948 the moral right to create Israel. At the time only fifteen percent of the Jews in Palestine were born in Palestine and the native borns jews in Palestine only represented about three percent of the population of Palestine (Even sixty years later only twenty percent of Isreal's population was born in Israel).

4) Is it possible to not be anti-semetic but anti-zionist?

5) General Marshall (of the Marshall Plan) argued against the US recognition of Isreal because he said the result will be that our only friends in the middle east will be the Jews that immigrate there. Therefore, for US strategic interests this will be a disaster. Why was he wrong?

Israel
 

My question for the Liberals on the board?

1) Considering the hatred of Israel among the population of Iraq, how is democracy in Iraq going to help Israel?

2) What evidence is there that the invasion of Iraq was to help Israel at the expense of US interests.

3)Considering the fact that if Isreal will be only seven miles wide right in its middle if the West Bank is given up, why should Isreal give control to the West Bank to a people intent on destroying it. Wouldn't giving up the West Bank be an act of suicide?

First Amendment
 

I don't legitimize the injustice of what the Nobel committee did. As for leader, there is no Palestine, so I don't know what he was the leader of except for a terrorist organization.

It's called self-defence.

He is a terrorist. Israel is a nation and an ally. Saddam was the leader of a real nation. Arafat was a terrorist. Why can't the left admit it? Why glorify a anti-semitic babykiller?