LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 112
0 members and 112 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 06-12-2004, 06:55 PM   #389
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Playboy Presents: Girls of the U.S.D.C.

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Underneath Their Robes, a blog that dishes on Article III judges, is accepting nominations for "Superhotties of the Federal Judiciary." Current nominees are Hull, J. (11th Cir.),* Raggi, J. (2d Cir.), Roberts, J. (D.C. Cir.), Sutton, J. (6th Cir.), Wardlaw, J. (9th Cir.), and Wood, J. (S.D.N.Y.).

The N.D. Cal. has one or two people I might consider submitting, IYKWIM.

*Having a hard time imagining how a woman named "Frank M. Hull" can be a superhottie? Consider the competition.
Kimba Woods hot? nope. If there are double-anal photos of you on the net- YOU ARE A SKANK! Advise and consent not-with-standing.

And while I would like to claim my cherry went to someone Thurgreed hot, I've gotta admit; I feel like I've been on the recieving end of some anal from Avern Cohn and the Hon. Gerald E. Rosen, and they're NOT HOT, and I would like not to go on a second date IYKWIM.

PS please admire the discrecion not to turn this into a "professions not thought to be hot" Eva excuse.....
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts

Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 06-12-2004 at 06:58 PM..
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:21 PM.